LITT
Try LITT free
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK v INVESTMENT GROUP PRIVATE [2017] DIFC CFI 026 — Case management conditions on counterclaims (02 April 2017)
The dispute arose in the context of long-standing litigation between Standard Chartered Bank and Investment Group Private Limited regarding a loan agreement. While the Claimant pursued summary judgment, the Defendant sought to introduce new, unpleaded counterclaims.
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK v INVESTMENT GROUP PRIVATE [2016] DIFC CFI 026 — Judicial stay and indemnity costs for procedural abuse (27 October 2016)
The Court of First Instance was tasked with determining an application for immediate judgment under RDC 24.1 regarding a substantial banking claim. However, the proceedings were interrupted by an order from the Chief Justice of the Dubai Court of Cassation, which triggered the involvement of the…
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK v INVESTMENT GROUP PRIVATE [2016] DIFC CFI 026 — Dismissal of stay application pending Union Supreme Court determination (14 August 2016)
The dispute centers on the Defendant’s attempt to halt the ongoing litigation initiated by Standard Chartered Bank. Investment Group Private filed an Application Notice (CFI-026-2014/4) on 13 June 2016, requesting that the DIFC Court of First Instance stay all proceedings.
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK v INVESTMENT GROUP PRIVATE [2015] DIFC CFI 026 — Consent order regarding procedural stay (30 July 2015)
The litigation involves a banking dispute initiated by Standard Chartered Bank against Investment Group Private Limited. While the underlying merits of the claim remain secondary to the procedural maneuvering in this specific order, the case centers on the Defendant’s challenge to the court's…
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK v INVESTMENT GROUP PRIVATE [2015] DIFC CFI 026 — Leave to appeal granted on public importance grounds (16 February 2015)
The litigation between Standard Chartered Bank and Investment Group Private Limited, filed under case number CFI-026-2014, centers on a high-stakes banking dispute that reached a critical juncture regarding the finality of interlocutory orders.
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK v INVESTMENT GROUP PRIVATE [2015] DIFC CFI 026 — The rejection of forum non conveniens in inter-Emirate disputes (15 January 2015)
The dispute arose from two separate loan agreements and a related security instrument, which led Standard Chartered Bank (SCB) to initiate proceedings in the DIFC Courts. The claimant sought to recover substantial sums owed by the defendant, Investment Group Private Limited (IGPL), under these…