LITT
Try LITT free
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK v INVESTMENT GROUP PRIVATE [2018] DIFC CFI 026/2014 — Permission to appeal granted on set-off doctrines (05 February 2018)
The DIFC Court of First Instance grants leave to appeal an order concerning the application of mandatory and judicial set-off under the UAE Civil Code, citing significant public interest in clarifying these core legal doctrines.
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK v INVESTMENT GROUP PRIVATE [2017] DIFC CFI 026 — Refusal of leave to appeal and stay of execution (01 October 2017)
The dispute centers on the enforcement of debt obligations arising from two separate loan agreements between Standard Chartered Bank and Investment Group Private Limited. While the Defendant did not challenge the underlying merits or the quantum of the debt, they sought to obstruct enforcement by…
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK v INVESTMENT GROUP PRIVATE [2014] DIFC CFI 026 — Immediate judgment and anti-setoff enforcement (05 September 2017)
The litigation centered on the recovery of outstanding principal amounts owed by Investment Group Private Limited (IGPL) to Standard Chartered Bank (SCB) under two distinct credit facilities.
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK v INVESTMENT GROUP PRIVATE [2014] DIFC CFI 026 — Immediate judgment on loan defaults and anti-setoff enforceability (16 August 2017)
The dispute centered on the recovery of outstanding principal amounts owed by Investment Group Private Limited (IGPL) to Standard Chartered Bank (SCB) under two distinct credit facilities.
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK v INVESTMENT GROUP PRIVATE [2016] DIFC CFI 026 — Judicial interpretation of Article 60 conflict of jurisdiction (01 August 2016)
The DIFC Court of First Instance clarifies that a "conflict of jurisdiction" under Article 60 of Federal Law 10 of 1973 requires a formal assertion of authority by the competing courts, rather than mere parallel filings by litigants.