LITT
Try LITT free
KENNETH DAVID ROHAN v DAMAN REAL ESTATE CAPITAL PARTNERS [2013] DIFC CFI 025 — Quantification of damages and refusal of stay of execution (11 November 2013)
The dispute centers on the failure of Daman Real Estate Capital Partners Limited to fulfill obligations under various Sale and Purchase Agreements (SPAs) with the Claimants. Following the court’s substantive judgment on 4 August 2013, this order served to quantify the precise damages and interest…
KENNETH DAVID ROHAN v DAMAN REAL ESTATE CAPITAL PARTNERS [2015] DIFC CFI 025 — Enforcement of Default Costs Certificate (26 January 2015)
The litigation involved a significant claim for legal costs arising from the underlying dispute in CFI 025/2012. Following the conclusion of the substantive proceedings, the Claimants—Kenneth David Rohan, Andrew James Mostyn Pugh, Michelle Gemma Mostyn Pugh, and Stuart James Cox—sought to recover…
DAMAN REAL ESTATE CAPITAL PARTNERS v KENNETH DAVID ROHAN [2013] DIFC CFI 025 — Refusal of stay of execution pending appeal (11 November 2013)
The dispute arose from a judgment handed down on 4 August 2013, in which Justice Sir Anthony Colman ordered Daman Real Estate Capital Partners Limited to return substantial deposits to the Claimants, Kenneth David Rohan, Andrew James Mostyn Pugh, Michelle Gemma Mostyn Pugh, and Stuart James Cox.
KENNETH DAVID ROHAN v DAMAN REAL ESTATE CAPITAL PARTNERS [2012] DIFC CFI 025 — Construction delay and contractual termination rights (04 August 2013)
The dispute arose from the failure of the Defendant, Daman Real Estate Capital Partners, to deliver residential apartments in the "The Buildings by Daman" project within the timelines stipulated in the sale and purchase agreements.
KENNETH DAVID ROHAN v DAMAN REAL ESTATE CAPITAL PARTNERS [2013] DIFC CFI 025 — Procedural order for closing submissions (28 May 2013)
This procedural order marks the transition from the evidentiary trial phase to the final written advocacy stage in a complex real estate dispute before the DIFC Court of First Instance.
KENNETH DAVID ROHAN v DAMAN REAL ESTATE CAPITAL PARTNERS [2013] DIFC CFI 025 — Procedural directions for closing submissions (16 May 2013)
The litigation involves a group of four Claimants—Kenneth David Rohan, Andrew James Mostyn Pugh, Michelle Gemma Mostyn Pugh, and Stuart James Cox—who brought an action against Daman Real Estate Capital Partners Limited.
KENNETH DAVID ROHAN v DAMAN REAL ESTATE CAPITAL PARTNERS [2013] DIFC CFI 025 — Disclosure and information request compliance (04 March 2013)
The dispute arises from a real estate matter involving Claimants Kenneth David Rohan, Andrew James Mostyn Pugh, Michelle Gemma Mostyn Pugh, and Stuart James Cox against the Defendant, Daman Real Estate Capital Partners.
KENNETH DAVID ROHAN v DAMAN REAL ESTATE CAPITAL PARTNERS [2013] DIFC CFI 025 — Case Management Order (06 January 2013)
The dispute involves four claimants—Kenneth David Rohan, Andrew James Mostyn Pugh, Michelle Gemma Mostyn Pugh, and Stuart James Cox—against Daman Real Estate Capital Partners. The litigation centers on real estate development issues, necessitating a structured approach to discovery to narrow the…