LITT
Try LITT free
FIMBANK P.L.C v BHATIA TR. CO. [2022] DIFC CFI 024 — Declaratory relief on guarantee demand requirements (29 August 2022)
This order clarifies the procedural threshold for triggering liability under guarantee agreements by confirming the sufficiency of specific postal and courier service methods for formal demands.
FIMBANK P.L.C v BHATIA TR. CO. [2022] DIFC CFI 024 — Failure to establish condition precedent for immediate judgment (01 April 2022)
The DIFC Court of First Instance dismissed an application for immediate judgment against guarantors, ruling that the claimant failed to prove that a formal demand for payment—a condition precedent to liability—had been validly issued.
FIMBANK P.L.C v BHATIA TR. CO. LLC [2021] DIFC CFI 024 — Default judgment for commercial debt (20 December 2021)
The dispute centers on a commercial debt recovery action initiated by FIMBANK P.L.C against the First Defendant, Bhatia Tr. Co. LLC, alongside two individual defendants. The Claimant sought a judgment for a specified sum of money arising from the First Defendant’s failure to satisfy its financial…
FIMBANK v BHATIA TR. CO. [2021] DIFC CFI 024 — Alternative service via email (19 April 2021)
The litigation involves FIMBANK P.L.C as the Claimant and a trio of Respondents: Bhatia Tr. Co. LLC, Mr. Rajeev Suresh Bhatia, and Mr. Suresh Tulsidas Bhatia. The dispute, registered under case number CFI 024/2021, necessitated an application for alternative service because the Claimant encountered…
FIMBANK P.L.C v BHATIA TR. CO. [2021] DIFC CFI 024 — Alternative service via email (18 April 2021)
The litigation involves a claim initiated by Fimbank P.L.C against three distinct defendants: a corporate entity and two individuals. The dispute centers on the procedural hurdle of initiating proceedings when standard service methods are either impractical or have failed, necessitating judicial…