LITTLITT Try LITT free
uae-difc-cases

SIMMONS AND SIMMONS MIDDLE EAST v MOHAMMED ABDEL-KHALEQ MOHAMMAD ABU-ALHAJ [2013] DIFC CFI 023 — Compelling disclosure for enforcement (05 November 2013)

The dispute arises from the Claimant, Simmons and Simmons Middle East LLP, seeking to recover outstanding sums following a Default Judgment issued against the First Defendant, Mohammed Abdel-Khaleq Mohammad Abu-Alhaj, and the Second Defendant, Petra Invest Ltd.

Sushant Shukla· ·7 min read
uae-difc-cases

SIMMONS AND SIMMONS MIDDLE EAST v MOHAMMED ABDEL-KHALEQ MOHAMMAD ABU-ALHAJ [2013] DIFC CFI 023 — Registrar’s order for attendance to facilitate judgment enforcement (04 November 2013)

This order clarifies the procedural mechanisms available to judgment creditors in the DIFC to compel the disclosure of assets held by corporate entities following a default judgment.

Sushant Shukla· ·4 min read
uae-difc-cases

SIMMONS AND SIMMONS MIDDLE EAST v MOHAMMED ABDEL-KHALEQ MOHAMMAD ABU-ALHAJ [2013] DIFC CFI 023 — Registrar order for oral examination of judgment debtor (01 September 2013)

This order marks a critical procedural step in the enforcement of a default judgment, compelling third-party disclosure to uncover the assets of a corporate judgment debtor.

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

SIMMONS AND SIMMONS MIDDLE EAST v PETRA INVEST LIMITED [2013] DIFC CFI 023 — Quantification of post-judgment interest (14 July 2013)

The dispute arose from unpaid invoices owed by the Second Defendant, Petra Invest Limited, to the Claimant, Simmons and Simmons Middle East LLP. Following a Default Judgment issued by the Registrar on 22 January 2013, the Claimant sought to formalize the interest components applicable to the…

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

SIMMONS AND SIMMONS MIDDLE EAST v MOHAMMED ABDEL-KHALEQ [2013] DIFC CFI 023 — Transfer to Small Claims Tribunal (21 March 2013)

The dispute involves a professional services claim brought by the international law firm Simmons and Simmons Middle East against Mohammed Abdel-Khaleq. While the specific nature of the underlying debt or contractual breach is not detailed in the procedural order, the filing of the claim in the…

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

SIMMONS AND SIMMONS MIDDLE EAST v MOHAMMAD ABDEL-KHALEQ MOHAMMAD ABU-ALHAJ [2013] DIFC CFI 023 — Procedural enforcement of Defence filings (22 January 2013)

The dispute centers on a claim initiated by the law firm Simmons and Simmons Middle East LLP against the First Defendant, Mohammad Abdel-Khaleq Mohammad Abu-Alhaj, and the Second Defendant, Petra Invest Ltd.

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

SIMMONS AND SIMMONS MIDDLE EAST v MOHAMMAD ABDEL-KHALEQ MOHAMMAD ABU-ALHAJ [2012] DIFC CFI 023 — Joinder of parties and procedural leave (31 October 2012)

The dispute originated from a claim filed by the international law firm Simmons and Simmons Middle East against Mohammad Abdel-Khaleq Mohammad Abu-Alhaj. While the underlying substantive merits of the claim were not detailed in this specific procedural order, the litigation reached a juncture where…

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

SIMMONS AND SIMMONS MIDDLE EAST v MOHAMMAD ABDEL-KHALEQ MOHAMMAD ABU-ALHAJ [2012] DIFC CFI 023 — Procedural joinder of third parties (02 September 2012)

The litigation involves a professional services dispute between the Claimant, Simmons and Simmons Middle East LLP, and the Defendant, Mohammad Abdel-Khaleq Mohammad Abu-Alhaj. The matter reached a procedural juncture on 28 August 2012, when the Claimant sought judicial intervention to expand the…

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read