LITT
Try LITT free
TAYSEER ALI v SADAPAY TECHNOLOGIES [2026] DIFC CFI 022 — Assessment of costs following dismissed appeal (17 March 2026)
The dispute arose following the dismissal of the Defendant’s Renewed Application for permission to appeal an earlier order made by Justice Roger Stewart. Following the dismissal of this application by H.E.
TAYSEER ALI v SADAPAY TECHNOLOGIES [2026] DIFC CFI 022 — Renewed application for permission to appeal regarding jurisdiction dismissed (29 January 2026)
The DIFC Court of Appeal confirms that specific jurisdiction clauses in incentive agreements prevail over general employment contracts, rejecting an attempt to move a share-based dispute to Pakistani courts.
TAYSEER ALI v SADAPAY TECHNOLOGIES [2025] DIFC CFI 022 — Assessment of costs in linked litigation (16 December 2025)
The DIFC Court of First Instance provides a critical reminder on the limits of cost recovery in multi-action litigation, emphasizing that proportionality under RDC 38 remains the primary filter for legal fees.
TAYSEER ALI v SADAPAY TECHNOLOGIES [2025] DIFC CFI 022 — Refusal of permission to appeal on share valuation dispute (20 November 2025)
The litigation concerns a contractual dispute over the valuation of shares granted to the Claimant, Tayseer Ali, by the Defendant, Sadapay Technologies. The core of the disagreement lies in the Claimant’s assertion that the Administrator failed to correctly determine the fair market value of these…
TAYSEER ALI v SADAPAY TECHNOLOGIES [2025] DIFC CFI 022 — Contractual characterization of share incentive claims (18 September 2025)
The lawsuit centered on a claim for breach of contract brought by Tayseer Ali against Sadapay Technologies Ltd. The Claimant alleged that the Defendant had improperly determined the fair market value of stock options granted to him under a Grant Agreement and a Share Incentive Plan.