LITT
Try LITT free
SAMER HENRY TADROSS v LEVANT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT [2015] DIFC CFI 022 — Discontinuance by consent following confidential settlement (10 May 2015)
The litigation, registered under case number CFI 022/2014, involved a contentious legal battle between the Claimant, Samer Henry Tadross, and the Defendant, Levant Investment Management Limited, which traded under the name Levant Capital Limited.
SAMER HENRY TADROSS v LEVANT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT [2015] DIFC CFI 022 — Pre-trial procedural directions (30 April 2015)
The litigation involves a claim brought by Samer Henry Tadross against Levant Investment Management Limited, a firm also trading as Levant Capital Limited. While the specific underlying causes of action are not detailed in this procedural order, the case reached a critical juncture in April 2015,…
SAMER HENRY TADROSS v LEVANT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT [2015] DIFC CFI 022 — Procedural enforcement of disclosure obligations (09 April 2015)
The dispute centers on a procedural impasse regarding the exchange of evidence. Samer Henry Tadross, the Claimant, initiated an application for an extension of time to file witness statements, citing the Defendant’s failure to adhere to a prior Disclosure Order issued on 9 March 2015.
SAMER HENRY TADROSS v LEVANT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT [2015] DIFC CFI 022 — Procedural adjustment of disclosure and witness evidence timelines (09 March 2015)
The dispute between Samer Henry Tadross and Levant Investment Management Limited (trading as Levant Capital Limited) reached a procedural juncture in early March 2015, necessitating judicial intervention regarding the timeline for document production.
SAMER HENRY TADROSS v LEVANT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LIMITED [2015] DIFC CFI 022 — Disclosure obligations and property retention (01 March 2015)
The dispute in CFI 022/2014 centers on the recovery and disclosure of corporate assets and information following the cessation of the relationship between Samer Henry Tadross and Levant Investment Management Limited (also known as Levant Capital Limited).
SAMER HENRY TADROSS v LEVANT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LIMITED [2015] DIFC CFI 022 — Amended Case Management Order (19 January 2015)
Following the failure of alternative dispute resolution, the DIFC Court of First Instance formalizes a strict procedural timeline to govern the final stages of litigation leading to a three-day trial.
SAMER HENRY TADROSS v LEVANT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LIMITED [2014] DIFC CFI 022 — Case Management Order (19 October 2014)
The litigation involves a commercial dispute between the Claimant, Samer Henry Tadross, and the Respondent, Levant Investment Management Limited (also referred to as Levant Capital Limited).