LITT
Try LITT free
ASIF HAKIM ADIL v FRONTLINE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS [2016] DIFC CFI 015 — Costs assessment and interim payment order (24 July 2016)
Following a successful employment claim, the DIFC Court of First Instance addresses the quantum of costs, rejecting a percentage reduction while ordering a substantial interim payment to the Claimant.
ASIF HAKIM ADIL v FRONTLINE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS [2016] DIFC CFI 015 — Final judgment and statutory penalty enforcement (29 May 2016)
This order finalizes the quantum of damages in a long-standing employment dispute, confirming the application of ongoing statutory penalties under DIFC law until full satisfaction of the judgment debt.
ASIF HAKIM ADIL v FRONTLINE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS [2016] DIFC CFI 015 — Leave to appeal granted regarding procedural order (22 May 2016)
The underlying dispute in CFI 015/2014 concerns a protracted employment claim brought by Asif Hakim Adil against Frontline Development Partners. Following a series of interlocutory skirmishes—including disputes over disclosure, security for costs, and witness evidence deadlines—the litigation…
ASIF HAKIM ADIL v FRONTLINE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS [2016] DIFC CFI 015 — Leave to appeal granted regarding procedural order (19 May 2016)
The dispute between Asif Hakim Adil and Frontline Development Partners has been characterized by extensive procedural maneuvering, culminating in the order issued by Justice Roger Giles on 3 April 2016.
ASIF HAKIM ADIL v FRONTLINE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS [2016] DIFC CFI 015 — Employment termination and statutory penalty application (03 April 2016)
The dispute centered on the employment relationship between Mr. Asif Hakim Adil and Frontline Development Partners, where the Claimant sought substantial compensation following his departure from the firm.
ASIF HAKIM ADIL v FRONTLINE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS [2015] DIFC CFI 015 — Admissibility of without prejudice materials and judicial contamination (03 November 2015)
The litigation concerns an employment dispute between Asif Hakim Adil and Frontline Development Partners Limited, stemming from the termination of the Claimant’s employment on 30 June 2013.
ASIF HAKIM ADIL v FRONTLINE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS [2015] DIFC CFI 015 — Procedural variation of closing submission deadlines (20 July 2015)
The litigation involves a contentious employment dispute between the Claimant, Asif Hakim Adil, and the Defendant, Frontline Development Partners. This matter has been subject to multiple procedural interventions by the Court, including earlier applications regarding strike-out motions and…
ASIF HAKIM ADIL v FRONTLINE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS [2015] DIFC CFI 015 — Procedural variation of witness evidence deadlines (19 March 2015)
The litigation between Asif Hakim Adil and Frontline Development Partners represents a protracted employment dispute that has necessitated multiple procedural interventions by the DIFC Court.
ASIF HAKIM ADIL v FRONTLINE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS [2015] DIFC CFI 015 — Security for costs application dismissed (25 February 2015)
The dispute centers on a claim brought by Asif Hakim Adil against Frontline Development Partners Limited. In the course of the litigation, the Defendant filed an Application Notice, CFI-015-2014/2, on 10 December 2014, requesting that the Court order the Claimant to provide security for the…
MR ASIF HAKIM ADIL v FRONTLINE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS [2015] DIFC CFI 015 — Disclosure order for Redfern Schedule production (27 January 2015)
The dispute between Mr Asif Hakim Adil and Frontline Development Partners Limited centers on the Claimant’s demand for the production of documents deemed necessary to substantiate his claims.
ASIF HAKIM ADIL v FRONTLINE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS [2014] DIFC CFI 015 — Employment dispute and strike-out application (08 October 2014)
The Court of First Instance addresses the limits of strike-out applications in employment litigation, clarifying that factual allegations underpinning a counterclaim remain viable even when specific heads of relief are abandoned.