LITT
Try LITT free
TAALEEM v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION [2014] DIFC CFI 014 — Finality of judgment and denial of permission to appeal (17 August 2014)
The litigation, which spanned several years, involved complex claims between Taaleem PJSC, National Bonds Corporation PJSC, and Deyaar Development PJSC. Following a substantive judgment by Justice Sir David Steel, Deyaar Development sought to challenge the outcome by applying for permission to…
TAALEEM v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION [2015] DIFC CFI 014 — Consent order dismissing appeal (25 November 2015)
The litigation in CFI 014/2010 involves a complex commercial dispute between the Claimant, Taaleem, and two defendants: National Bonds Corporation and Deyaar Development. The case has been a long-standing fixture of the DIFC Court of First Instance, involving multiple procedural stages, including…
TAALEEM v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION [2015] DIFC CFI 014 — Leave to appeal granted on novation and Murabaha profit charges (18 November 2015)
The litigation centers on the financial obligations arising from the Sky Gardens real estate project. Taaleem PJSC sought to transfer its rights and obligations regarding the project to Deyaar Development, a move that implicated financing previously provided by National Bonds Corporation (NBC).
TAALEEM P.J.S.C. v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION [2015] DIFC CFI 014 — Disclosure order regarding judgment debt enforcement (20 August 2015)
The dispute centers on the enforcement of a significant Judgment Debt owed by Deyaar Development (the Judgment Debtor) to National Bonds Corporation (the Judgment Creditor). Following a series of prior rulings, including the Judgment of Justice Sir David Steel on 19 February 2014 and 23 March 2015,…
TAALEEM v DEYAAR DEVELOPMENT [2015] DIFC CFI 014 — Denial of leave to appeal against clarification of liability (03 August 2015)
The Chief Justice affirms the finality of earlier findings by refusing to allow a second attempt at appealing substantive liability issues under the guise of seeking judgment clarification.
TAALEEM v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION [2015] DIFC CFI 014 — Registrar’s order for interim payment of costs (02 July 2015)
The litigation in CFI 014/2010 involves a multi-party dispute initiated by Taaleem P.J.S.C. against National Bonds Corporation (the First Defendant) and Deyaar Development (the Second Defendant).
TAALEEM v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION [2015] DIFC CFI 014 — Consent order regarding disclosure and witness examination (28 May 2015)
The litigation involves a complex dispute between Taaleem P.J.S.C. and the defendants, National Bonds Corporation and Deyaar Development. Following a substantive judgment delivered by Justice Sir David Steel on 23 March 2015, the parties entered a phase of post-judgment procedural management.
TAALEEM P.J.S.C. v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION P.J.S.C. [2015] DIFC CFI 014 — Compelling disclosure and personal attendance of a judgment debtor's CFO (13 May 2015)
The dispute concerns the enforcement of a judgment against Deyaar Development P.J.S.C. (the "Judgment Debtor"). Following an ex parte application by the Judgment Creditor, the Court sought to pierce the veil of the debtor's financial holdings to identify assets capable of satisfying the outstanding…
TAALEEM v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION [2015] DIFC CFI 014 — Stay of execution application (27 April 2015)
The application arose from the ongoing litigation between Taaleem P.J.S.C. and the respondents, National Bonds Corporation P.J.S.C. and Deyaar Development P.J.S.C. Following a judgment delivered on 23 March 2015, Deyaar sought to stay the enforcement of the resulting order pending the outcome of…
TAALEEM P.J.S.C. v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION P.J.S.C. [2010] DIFC CFI 014 — Quantum assessment and novation of Sky Gardens finance (23 March 2015)
The litigation concerned the financial obligations arising from the purchase of units in the "Sky Gardens" development. The core of the dispute involved determining which party—the original purchaser, Taaleem, or the subsequent transferee, Deyaar—bore the burden of repaying the principal, Murabaha…
DEYAAR DEVELOPMENT v TAALEEM [2014] DIFC CFI 014 — Final denial of permission to appeal (16 October 2014)
The DIFC Court of First Instance definitively concludes the appellate path for Deyaar Development in its long-running dispute with Taaleem and National Bonds, underscoring the necessity of robust, reasoned arguments when seeking reconsideration of refused leave to appeal.
TAALEEM v DEYAAR DEVELOPMENT [2014] DIFC CFI 014 — Denial of reconsideration for permission to appeal (17 August 2014)
The DIFC Court of First Instance reinforces the strict procedural requirements for appellants seeking to overturn a refusal of permission to appeal, emphasizing the necessity of demonstrating substantive error in the initial judicial assessment.
TAALEEM v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION [2014] DIFC CFI 014 — Refusal of leave to appeal regarding concluded property agreement (24 April 2014)
The litigation centered on a commercial dispute involving the sale of a one-third interest in residential units within the Sky Gardens development. Taaleem, the claimant, had originally acquired this interest with financing provided by National Bonds Corporation.
TAALEEM v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION [2010] DIFC CFI 014 — Refusal of leave to appeal regarding property transfer agreement (16 April 2014)
Justice Roger Giles, sitting as a single judge of the Court of Appeal, denies Deyaar Development’s application for leave to appeal, affirming the trial judge’s finding of a concluded agreement for the transfer of property interests in the Sky Gardens development.
TAALEEM v DEYAAR DEVELOPMENT [2010] DIFC CFI 014 — Determining liability for AED 236 million in property investment debt (19 February 2014)
The Court of First Instance resolved a complex multi-party dispute regarding the transfer of property interests in the Sky Gardens development, clarifying the requirements for contract formation and the threshold for setting aside transactions due to alleged conflicts of interest.
TALEEM v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION [2010] DIFC CFI 014 — Expert evidence on non-DIFC Dubai law (10 July 2013)
The litigation involves a complex commercial dispute between Taleem PJSC and two respondents, National Bonds Corporation PJSC and Deyaar Development PJSC. The core of the conflict centers on whether the substantive legal issues governing the parties' relationship are subject to DIFC law or the…
TAALEEM v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION [2013] DIFC CFI 014 — Case management directions for trial (12 May 2013)
The litigation involves Taaleem P.J.S.C. as the Claimant against National Bonds Corporation P.J.S.C. and Deyaar Development P.J.S.C. as the First and Second Defendants, respectively.
TAALEEM v DEYAAR DEVELOPMENT [2013] DIFC CFI 014 — Compelling document production and electronic discovery (17 March 2013)
Justice Sir John Chadwick issues a comprehensive order mandating the production of sensitive correspondence and the restoration of electronic records to resolve discovery disputes in the Sky Gardens litigation.
TAALEEM v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION [2010] DIFC CFI 014 — Disclosure obligations and the insufficiency of 'no documents' responses (12 March 2013)
The litigation centers on a complex real estate transaction involving the "Sky Gardens" property located within the DIFC. The Claimant, Taaleem PJSC, initiated proceedings against the first Defendant, National Bonds Corporation (NBC), and the second Defendant, Deyaar Development, seeking to resolve…
TAALEEM v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION [2013] DIFC CFI 014 — Case management order for trial preparation (20 February 2013)
The order serves as a comprehensive case management instrument designed to streamline the complex litigation between Taaleem P.J.S.C. and the two defendants. By setting firm deadlines for the exchange of witness statements—initially by 25 April 2013, with reply statements due by 27 June 2013—the…
TAALEEM v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION [2012] DIFC CFI 014 — Procedural extension for disclosure applications (29 October 2012)
The litigation between Taaleem and the defendants, National Bonds Corporation and Deyaar Development, involves complex evidentiary requirements necessitating strict adherence to the Rules of the DIFC Courts (RDC).
TAALEEM v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION [2011] DIFC CFI 014 — Procedural consent order for complex multi-party litigation (02 August 2011)
The litigation involves a complex dispute between Taaleem P.J.S.C. as the Claimant, and National Bonds Corporation P.J.S.C. and Deyaar Development P.J.S.C. as the First and Second Defendants, respectively.
TAALEEM v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION [2011] DIFC CFI 014 — Dismissal of Application 088/2010 and procedural directions for appeal (08 March 2011)
The litigation in CFI 014/2010 involves a complex dispute between Taaleem and the First Defendant, National Bonds Corporation, alongside the Second Defendant, Deyaar Development. The underlying conflict centers on contractual obligations and potential liabilities arising from development projects,…
TAALEEM v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION [2011] DIFC CFI 014 — Granting leave to appeal on jurisdictional and procedural disputes (19 January 2011)
The litigation involves a complex commercial dispute between Taaleem PJSC, acting as the Claimant, and two primary defendants: National Bonds Corporation PJSC and Deyaar Development PJSC.