LITT
Try LITT free
AHMED MAJED MOHAMAD LUTFI KABBARA v EFG-HERMES UAE [2017] DIFC CFI 011 — Final resolution via consent order (25 September 2017)
The litigation involved a claim brought by Ahmed Majed Mohamad Lutfi Kabbara against EFG-Hermes UAE Limited, which eventually escalated to include an appeal against a prior judicial order.
AHMED MAJED MOHAMAD LUTFI KABBARA v EFG-HERMES UAE [2017] DIFC CFI 011 — Procedural timeline for appeal and reply (26 July 2017)
A procedural consent order issued by the DIFC Court of First Instance establishing strict deadlines for the filing of a Reply to the Defence and opposition submissions regarding an Application to Appeal.
AHMAD MAJED MOHAMAD LUTFI KABBARA v EFG-HERMES UAE [2017] DIFC CFI 011 — Costs allocation for failed applications and procedural delay (18 June 2017)
The dispute centered on the Claimant’s attempt to secure the cancellation of his employment visa while substantive employment claims remained unresolved. The Claimant sought to have his visa status regularized without prejudice to his ongoing financial claims against EFG-Hermes UAE.
AHMED MAJED MOHAMAD LUTFI KABBARA v EFG-HERMES UAE [2017] DIFC CFI 011 — procedural transition from Part 8 to Part 7 (11 May 2017)
The dispute between Ahmed Majed Mohamad Lutfi Kabbara and EFG-Hermes UAE Limited originated as a claim filed under Part 8 of the Rules of the DIFC Courts (RDC). Part 8 is typically reserved for claims where there is no substantial dispute of fact or where the issue is primarily one of law, allowing…
AHMED MAJED MOHAMAD LUTFI KABBARA v EFG-HERMES UAE [2017] DIFC CFI 011 — Procedural dismissal of Part 8 application (12 April 2017)
The Claimant, Ahmed Majed Mohamad Lutfi Kabbara, sought to utilize the Part 8 procedure of the Rules of the DIFC Courts (RDC) to compel his former employer, EFG-Hermes UAE Limited, to provide specific documentation and a formal written statement regarding his dismissal.