LITT
Try LITT free
ITHMAR CAPITAL v 8 INVESTMENT [2008] DIFC CFI 008 — Final judgment and cost allocation (01 December 2008)
The dispute concerns the enforcement of financial obligations arising from the underlying litigation between Ithmar Capital and the defendants, 8 Investment Inc and 8 Investment Group FZE.
ITHMAR CAPITAL v 8 INVESTMENT [2009] DIFC CFI 008 — Judicial authorization for substituted service (11 March 2009)
Justice Sir Anthony Colman grants the Claimant leave to effect service on the Second Respondent via alternative means, including physical delivery to a hotel address and electronic mail.
ITHMAR CAPITAL v 8 INVESTMENT [2009] DIFC CFI 008 — Adjournment of committal proceedings and examination of third parties (08 June 2009)
This order addresses the procedural management of enforcement proceedings, specifically the adjournment of the examination of Sarah Decker and the continued suspension of a previously issued Committal Order.
ITHMAR CAPITAL v 8 INVESTMENT [2009] DIFC CFI 008 — Committal Order and electronic service protocols (14 May 2009)
Justice Sir Anthony Colman issues a suspended committal order against Sarah Decker, reinforcing the Court’s authority to compel compliance through personal attendance and modern service methods.
ITHMAR CAPITAL v 8 INVESTMENT [2009] DIFC CFI 008 — Compelling director disclosure for judgment enforcement (22 April 2009)
Following the judgment debt established in November 2008, the Claimant, Ithmar Capital, sought the assistance of the Court to uncover the financial means of the First Defendant, 8 Investment Inc.
ITHMAR CAPITAL v 8 INVESTMENT [2009] DIFC CFI 008 — Contempt of court and the lifting of a suspended committal order (11 March 2009)
The lawsuit originated as a commercial dispute involving Ithmar Capital and the defendants, 8 Investment Inc and 8 Investments Group FZE. As the litigation progressed, the court issued a suspended Committal Order on 25 February 2009, intended to compel compliance with specific court directives.
ITHMAR CAPITAL v 8 INVESTMENT [2009] DIFC CFI 008 — Committal for contempt and enforcement of disclosure obligations (23 February 2009)
The DIFC Court of First Instance exercises its coercive powers to enforce judgment disclosure requirements against a recalcitrant officer, issuing a suspended committal order to compel compliance.
ITHMAR CAPITAL v 8 INVESTMENT [2009] DIFC CFI 008 — Procedural conditions for withdrawal of legal representation (09 February 2009)
The litigation between Ithmar Capital and the defendants, 8 Investment Inc and 8 Investments Group FZE, reached a procedural impasse in early 2009 regarding legal representation. JSA Law, acting for the 1st Defendant, filed an application on 25 January 2009 to cease acting for their client.
ITHMAR CAPITAL v 8 INVESTMENT [2009] DIFC CFI 008 — Enforcement of judgment through examination of means (25 January 2009)
This order mandates the attendance of a company representative for an examination of means and imposes a significant interim payment obligation to facilitate the enforcement of a prior judgment.
ITHMAR CAPITAL v 8 INVESTMENT [2009] DIFC CFI 008 — Enforcement of judgment and third-party examination (22 January 2009)
Ithmar Capital, having secured a judgment against 8 Investment Inc on 24 November 2008, encountered significant difficulties in identifying and locating assets sufficient to satisfy the debt.
ITHMAR CAPITAL v 8 INVESTMENT [2009] DIFC CFI 008 — Judicial intervention in case management and settlement timelines (20 January 2009)
The litigation in CFI 008/2007 involved a complex set of applications brought by the Claimant, Ithmar Capital, against the Respondents, 8 Investment Inc and 8 Investment Group FZE. By January 2009, the parties had reached a juncture where multiple outstanding applications required judicial…
ITHMAR CAPITAL v 8 INVESTMENT [2009] DIFC CFI 008 — Procedural directions for witness examination (05 January 2009)
The litigation involves a claim brought by Ithmar Capital against two defendants, 8 Investment Inc and 8 Investment Group FZE. The matter reached a critical procedural juncture in late 2008, necessitating judicial intervention to manage the progression of evidence.
ITHMAR CAPITAL v 8 INVESTMENT [2008] DIFC CFI 008 — Final judgment and cost allocation (01 December 2008)
The litigation centered on a financial claim brought by Ithmar Capital against 8 Investment Inc and 8 Investment Group FZE. The dispute reached a definitive stage on 25 November 2008, when the Court addressed the final quantum of the debt owed by the First Defendant.
Ithmar Capital v 8 Investments Inc. and 8 Investment Group Fze [2007] DIFC CFI 008 — Breach of MOU and the limits of punitive damages (24 November 2008)
The dispute centered on an MOU dated 9 October 2007, under which 8 Investments Inc. (8II) agreed to assign its interest in a Unit Sale and Purchase Agreement (SPA) for office premises in Liberty House, DIFC, to Ithmar Capital for AED 27,647,200.