LITT
Try LITT free
HOWARD NORMAN LEEDHAM v OXFORD INVESTMENT MANAGERS [2008] DIFC CFI 006 — Rectification of clerical errors in employment judgments (22 November 2010)
The claimant, Howard Norman Leedham, sought a formal amendment to the judgment issued by the Court of First Instance on 21 June 2010. The application was necessitated by a specific factual inconsistency regarding the duration of his employment with the defendant, Oxford Investment Managers Limited.
HOWARD NORMAN LEEDHAM v OXFORD INVESTMENT MANAGERS [2008] DIFC CFI 006 — Employment dispute over unpaid salary and corporate identity (22 June 2010)
The DIFC Court of First Instance clarifies the jurisdictional reach over foreign entities and the procedural requirements for amending party names in employment litigation.
HOWARD NORMAN LEEDHAM v OXFORD INVESTMENT MANAGERS [2009] DIFC CFI 006 — Denial of default judgment application (20 July 2009)
The dispute in CFI 006/2008 centered on the Claimant, Howard Norman Leedham, seeking a default judgment against the Defendant, Oxford Investment Managers. The application was formally filed on 12 July 2009, following the Defendant’s failure to respond to the claim within the prescribed timeframe.
HOWARD NORMAN LEEDHAM v OXFORD INVESTMENT MANAGERS [2009] DIFC CFI 006 — Registrar denies summary judgment on conditional settlement offer (30 June 2009)
The dispute centers on an application for judgment filed by the Claimant, Howard Norman Leedham, against the Defendant, Oxford Investment Managers. The Claimant sought to bypass standard trial procedures by asserting that a letter dated 8 January 2009, sent by the Defendant, constituted a formal…