LITT
Try LITT free
NBE v MOHAMED ELSAYED HAMED OMRAN [2021] DIFC CFI 001 — Registrar order of discontinuance (08 November 2021)
The litigation involved NBE (DIFC) Limited as the Claimant and Mr Mohamed Elsayed Hamed Omran as the Defendant. While the specific underlying commercial cause of action remained private, the case had progressed through several procedural stages before its eventual termination.
NBE v MOHAMED ELSAYED HAMED OMRAN [2021] DIFC CFI 001 — Procedural extension for alternative dispute resolution (20 October 2021)
The litigation involves NBE (DIFC) Limited as the Claimant and Mr Mohamed Elsayed Hamed Omran as the Defendant. While the specific underlying commercial cause of action remains private, the proceedings have been characterized by a series of procedural adjustments aimed at facilitating settlement…
NBE v MOHAMED ELSAYED HAMED OMRAN [2021] DIFC CFI 001 — Agreed case management order for trial preparation (11 October 2021)
The DIFC Court of First Instance formalizes a comprehensive procedural roadmap for the resolution of the dispute between NBE (DIFC) Limited and Mr Mohamed Elsayed Hamed Omran, incorporating a mandatory stay for alternative dispute resolution.
NBE v MOHAMED ELSAYED HAMED OMRAN [2021] DIFC CFI 001 — Refusal of immediate judgment (12 July 2021)
The DIFC Court of First Instance clarifies the threshold for immediate judgment in a dispute involving NBE (DIFC) Limited and Mr Mohamed Elsayed Hamed Omran.
NBE v MOHAMED ELSAYED HAMED OMRAN [2021] DIFC CFI 001 — Procedural extension for immediate judgment response (09 May 2021)
The lawsuit involves a claim brought by NBE (DIFC) Limited against Mr. Mohamed Elsayed Hamed Omran. The matter reached a critical procedural juncture when the Claimant filed an Application for Immediate Judgment, identified as Application No. CFI-001-2021/1.
NBE v MOHAMED ELSAYED HAMED OMRAN [2021] DIFC CFI 001 — Procedural extension via consent order (01 February 2021)
The litigation in CFI 001/2021 involves a claim brought by NBE (DIFC) Limited against the defendant, Mr Mohamed Elsayed Hamed Omran. While the underlying substantive merits of the claim—such as the specific nature of the financial or contractual breach—remain outside the scope of this procedural…