LITT
Try LITT free
Hong Alvin v Chia Quee Khee [2011] SGHC 249
In Hong Alvin v Chia Quee Khee [2011] SGHC 249, the High Court allowed the appeal, ruling the respondent lacked locus standi. The court held that the estate had no beneficial interest in the shares, as they were validly transferred to the Fong Foundation, and struck out the claim.
CKV & Anor v CKX & Anor
In CKV & Anor v CKX & Anor, the High Court (Registrar) addressed issues of .
Hon Industries Pte Ltd v Wan Sheng Hao Construction Pte Ltd [2011] SGHC 247
In Hon Industries Pte Ltd v Wan Sheng Hao Construction Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Building and Construction Law, Civil Procedure.
MUHAMMAD YUSOFF SHAH BIN KHMAMARUDIN v MUHAMMAD TAUFIQ ABDUL HALIM
In MUHAMMAD YUSOFF SHAH BIN KHMAMARUDIN v MUHAMMAD TAUFIQ ABDUL HALIM, the High Court (Registrar) addressed issues of .
OMG Holdings Pte Ltd v Pos Ad Sdn Bhd [2011] SGHC 246
Case Details * Citation: [2011] SGHC 246 * Case Number: Suit No 253 of 2009 * Decision Date: 17 November 2011 * Court: High Court of Singapore * Coram: Andrew Ang J * Judgment Delivered By: Andrew Ang
FU YUAN CONSTRUCTION PTE LTD v FAB-5 PTE LTD
In FU YUAN CONSTRUCTION PTE LTD v FAB-5 PTE LTD, the High Court (Registrar) addressed issues of .
Mok Kwong Yue v Ding Leng Kong [2011] SGHC 245
In Mok Kwong Yue v Ding Leng Kong, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Taxation of Costs.
XZ v YA [2011] SGHC 244
In XZ v YA, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family Law.
AUTOEXPORT & EPZ PTE. LTD. v TOW77 PTE. LTD.
In AUTOEXPORT & EPZ PTE. LTD. v TOW77 PTE. LTD., the High Court (Registrar) addressed issues of .
Chua Lee Choo v Lee Chow San [2011] SGHC 243
In Chua Lee Choo v Lee Chow San [2011] SGHC 243, the court resolved a dispute between former partners over misappropriated funds. The court ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff a net balance of $91,571.17, plus interest and legal costs, after offsetting mutual financial contributions.
Law Society of Singapore v Ng Bock Hoh Dixon [2011] SGHC 242
In Law Society of Singapore v Ng Bock Hoh Dixon, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Legal Profession.
VRJ v VRK
In VRJ v VRK, the High Court (Family Division) addressed issues of .
Mano Vikrant Singh v Cargill TSF Asia Pte Ltd [2011] SGHC 241
In Mano Vikrant Singh v Cargill TSF Asia Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Illegality and Public Policy.
VLG v VLH
In VLG v VLH, the High Court (Family Division) addressed issues of .
Public Prosecutor v Koh Seah Wee and another [2011] SGHC 240
In Public Prosecutor v Koh Seah Wee and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Procedure and Sentencing.
VOU v VOT
In VOU v VOT, the High Court (Family Division) addressed issues of .
Yap Sing Lee v Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 1267 [2011] SGHC 24
In Yap Sing Lee v Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 1267, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Land.
VQB v VQC
In VQB v VQC, the High Court (Family Division) addressed issues of .
Gatekeeper, Inc v Wang Wensheng (trading as Hawkeye Technologies) [2011] SGHC 239
In Gatekeeper, Inc v Wang Wensheng (trading as Hawkeye Technologies), the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Injunctions — Interlocutory injunction.
VXM v VXN
In VXM v VXN, the High Court (Family Division) addressed issues of .
Public Prosecutor v Luo Faming [2011] SGHC 238
In Public Prosecutor v Luo Faming, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of criminal procedure and sentencing.
VUW & 3 Ors v VUU & Anor
In VUW & 3 Ors v VUU & Anor, the High Court (Family Division) addressed issues of .
Sigrid Else Roger Marthe Wauters v Lieven Corneel Leo Raymond Van Den Brande [2011] SGHC 237
In Sigrid Else Roger Marthe Wauters v Lieven Corneel Leo Raymond Van Den Brande, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family Law.
VYP v VYQ
In VYP v VYQ, the High Court (Family Division) addressed issues of .