LITTLITT Try LITT free
Singapore

Lee Seng Eder v Wee Kim Chwee and others [2015] SGHCR 2

In Lee Seng Eder v Wee Kim Chwee and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Striking Out.

Sushant Shukla· ·10 min read
Singapore

Tan Huey Kuan (alias Chen Huijuan) v Tan Kok Chye and another

In Tan Huey Kuan (alias Chen Huijuan) v Tan Kok Chye and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .

Sushant Shukla· ·9 min read
Singapore

ROYAL MELBOURNE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY v STANSFIELD COLLEGE PTE LTD & Anor

In ROYAL MELBOURNE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY v STANSFIELD COLLEGE PTE LTD & Anor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .

Sushant Shukla· ·9 min read
Singapore

Sentosa Building Construction Pte Ltd v DJ Builders & Contractors Pte Ltd [2015] SGHCR 18

In Sentosa Building Construction Pte Ltd v DJ Builders & Contractors Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Building and Construction Law — Setting Aside of Order Setting Aside Adjudication Determination, Civil Procedure — Consent Orders.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Public Prosecutor v Leow Kok Meng

In Public Prosecutor v Leow Kok Meng, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

The "Xin Chang Shu" [2015] SGHCR 17

Analysis of [2015] SGHCR 17, a decision of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore on 2015-08-11.

Sushant Shukla· ·9 min read
Singapore

Loo Look Yin v Kok Kum Yue (alias Koh Kum Yue)

In Loo Look Yin v Kok Kum Yue (alias Koh Kum Yue), the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

PT Selecta Bestama v Sin Huat Huat Marine Transportation Pte Ltd [2015] SGHCR 16

In PT Selecta Bestama v Sin Huat Huat Marine Transportation Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil procedure — setting aside default judgment.

Sushant Shukla· ·9 min read
Singapore

AMW v AMZ

In AMW v AMZ, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Louis Vuitton Malletier v Cuffz (Singapore) Pte Ltd [2015] SGHCR 15

In Louis Vuitton Malletier v Cuffz (Singapore) Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Trade Marks — Infringement.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Fongsoon Engineering (S) Pte Ltd v Kensteel Engineering Pte Ltd

In Fongsoon Engineering (S) Pte Ltd v Kensteel Engineering Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Teo Ai Hua (alias Teo Jimmy) and another v Teo Mui Mui

In Teo Ai Hua (alias Teo Jimmy) and another v Teo Mui Mui, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Law Kin Ying (administratrix of the estate of Lo Hon Man, deceased) and others v Lim Hong Hock [2015] SGHCR 14

In Law Kin Ying (administratrix of the estate of Lo Hon Man, deceased) and others v Lim Hong Hock, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Damages - Assessment.

Sushant Shukla· ·9 min read
Singapore

YASHWANT BAJAJ v TORU UEDA

In YASHWANT BAJAJ v TORU UEDA, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .

Sushant Shukla· ·9 min read
Singapore

LTT Global Consultants v BMC Academy Pte Ltd

In LTT Global Consultants v BMC Academy Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .

Sushant Shukla· ·9 min read
Singapore

Newcon Builders Pte Ltd v Sino New Steel Pte Ltd [2015] SGHCR 13

The High Court's supervisory jurisdiction in setting aside an adjudication determination is limited to ensuring the adjudicator was validly appointed and that the process adhered to mandatory statutory requirements; it does not extend to reviewing the merits of the adjudicator's

Sushant Shukla· ·14 min read
Singapore

TMT ASIA LIMITED v BHP BILLITON MARKETING AG (SINGAPORE BRANCH) & Anor

In TMT ASIA LIMITED v BHP BILLITON MARKETING AG (SINGAPORE BRANCH) & Anor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .

Sushant Shukla· ·9 min read
Singapore

Tan Chin Heng v Public Prosecutor

In Tan Chin Heng v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .

Sushant Shukla· ·7 min read
Singapore

Ram Parshotam Mittal v Portcullis Trustnet (Singapore) Pte Ltd and others [2015] SGHCR 12

In Ram Parshotam Mittal v Portcullis Trustnet (Singapore) Pte Ltd and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Discovery.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Max Sources Pte Ltd v Agrocon (S) Pte Ltd and another [2015] SGHCR 11

In Max Sources Pte Ltd v Agrocon (S) Pte Ltd and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Compromise, Contract — Consideration.

Sushant Shukla· ·9 min read
Singapore

Rankine Bernadette Adeline v Chenet Finance Ltd

In Rankine Bernadette Adeline v Chenet Finance Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .

Sushant Shukla· ·9 min read
Singapore

Prima Bulkship Pte Ltd (in creditors' voluntary liquidation) and another v Lim Say Wan and another [2015] SGHCR 10

In Prima Bulkship Pte Ltd (in creditors' voluntary liquidation) and another v Lim Say Wan and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil procedure — pleadings.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Keng & Keong Construction Pte Ltd v Swee Hong Engineering Construction Pte Ltd

The court dismissed the plaintiff's wrongful termination claim but allowed recovery of progress claims. While the defendant succeeded in its counterclaim for repudiatory breach, it was awarded only nominal damages of $100 due to a failure to substantiate actual or liquidated damages.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Tang Ying & 6 Ors v Chen Mingliang & 2 Ors

The court varied a Mareva injunction by lifting the restraint on a property and allowing a caveat to be lodged instead, finding that the balance of convenience favoured protecting the interests of the innocent plaintiffs while ensuring the defendant could not dissipate assets.

Sushant Shukla· ·14 min read