LITT
Try LITT free
WCT Berhad v Meydan Group [[2016] DIFC ARB 003](https://legal-wires.com/uae-difc/gauge-investments-v-ganelle-capital-2016-difc-arb-003-the-arbitrability-of-regulatory-breaches-in-the-difc/): The Limits of Judicial Recusal in High-Stakes Arbitration
How Justice Sir David Steel dismantled a tactical recusal attempt in the long-running Meydan litigation saga
Fran v Faimida [2015] DIFC ARB 002: The Limits of Procedural Obstruction in Arbitral Enforcement
Justice Sir David Steel’s decisive rejection of parallel annulment tactics in the DIFC Courts On January 22, 2015, Justice Sir David Steel handed down a stern rebuke to a defendant attempting to stall the inevitable.
Fabiola v Faddey [2015] DIFC ARB 001: Balancing Arbitral Finality Against Parallel Annulment Challenges
How Sir John Chadwick’s intervention in the Fabiola dispute defined the DIFC’s cautious approach to enforcement during pending local court challenges.
Lachesis v Lacrosse [2021] DIFC ARB 005: The High Bar for Challenging Arbitral Awards on Public Policy Grounds
How Justice Shamlan Al Sawalehi closed the door on merit-based appeals disguised as public policy challenges. On March 22, 2021, H.E.
Ginette v Geary [2015] DIFC ARB 012: The Doctrine of Apparent Authority in Arbitral Enforcement
How the DIFC Courts solidified the enforceability of arbitration agreements signed by agents lacking express authority. On 7 April 2016, H.E.
Egan v Eava [2013] DIFC ARB 002: Why the DIFC Courts Rejected the 'Public Policy' Shield Against Enforcement
Justice Sir Anthony Colman’s seminal ruling on the limits of jurisdictional challenges in the enforcement of arbitral awards. On July 29, 2015, Justice Sir Anthony Colman delivered a decisive blow to procedural obstructionism in the DIFC Courts.
Omanand v Ondrei [2026] DIFC ARB 050: The Reach of Post-Award Interim Measures Under the 2025 Court Law
H.E. Justice Roger Stewart KC clarifies the scope of the DIFC’s supportive jurisdiction in the wake of a USD 600 million arbitral award. On January 22, 2026, H.E.
Okeke v Obike [2026] DIFC ARB 039: The Strict Enforcement of Statutory Time Limits in Arbitration Set-Aside Applications
H.E. Justice Shamlan Al Sawalehi reinforces the finality of arbitral awards by dismissing a late-filed challenge to a DIAC partial award. On 5 March 2026, H.E.
Mibot v Mfast [2022] DIFC ARB 035: The Limits of Waiver and the Binding Nature of Arbitration Agreements
How the DIFC Courts clarified the threshold for challenging arbitration agreements in the wake of parallel onshore litigation. On 25 January 2022, H.E.
Ozan v Owain [2026] DIFC ARB 029: Why RDC Part 43 Remains a Self-Contained Enforcement Fortress
The DIFC Court of First Instance clarifies that jurisdictional challenges cannot hijack the summary nature of arbitral award enforcement. On April 9, 2026, H.E.
Likitif v Luvaun [2022] DIFC ARB 028: The Primacy of Arbitration Clauses in Subcontractual Disputes
How the DIFC Courts reinforce the jurisdictional boundary between commercial invoices and master agreements On October 25, 2022, H.E.
Muwarn v Mihad [2023] DIFC ARB 025: Defining the Procedural Boundaries of Arbitral Award Enforcement
How the DIFC Courts clarified the 'opposed' status of enforcement claims and the limits of case management discretion On 10 January 2023, H.E.
Octavia v Oisin [2025] DIFC ARB 023: The Standard of Reasonableness in Post-Enforcement Costs Recovery
How the DIFC Courts are streamlining the path to full indemnity in arbitration enforcement proceedings. On 15 August 2025, H.E.
Nuriel v Nuzhat [2024] DIFC ARB 018: The Clarity Test and the Limits of Contractual Discrepancy
How the DIFC Courts are reinforcing the 'Clarity Test' to prevent parallel proceedings in the Abu Dhabi Courts. On September 4, 2024, H.E.
Lathor v Liufan [2022] DIFC ARB 018: The Enforcement of DIAC Awards in Residential Tenancy Disputes
How the DIFC Courts are streamlining the transition from arbitral award to physical eviction in the private rental sector. On 14 November 2022, H.E.
Ledger v Leeor [2022] DIFC ARB 016: The High Bar for Anti-Suit Injunctions in Seat-Ambiguous Disputes
Justice Michael Black’s refusal to restrain Dubai Court proceedings underscores the limits of DIFC supervisory jurisdiction. On October 7, 2022, Justice Michael Black delivered a decisive blow to Ledger’s attempt to halt parallel litigation in the Dubai Court of First Instance.
Obert v Ondray [2025] DIFC ARB 014: The Limits of Procedural Obstruction in Award Recognition
How the DIFC Courts reaffirmed the principle of separability against a backdrop of meritless jurisdictional challenges. On 9 October 2025, H.E.
Novak v Norwood [2024] DIFC ARB 012: The Limits of Public Policy Challenges in Arbitral Enforcement
H.E. Justice Shamlan Al Sawalehi clarifies the boundaries of the act of state doctrine and evidentiary standards in the DIFC Courts. On August 29, 2024, H.E.
Limeo Investment & Real Estate v Landia Educational Services [2019] DIFC ARB 012: Resolving Ambiguity in Arbitration Clauses
How the DIFC Courts interpret 'LCIA' references in the wake of the DIFC-LCIA's institutional evolution. On April 14, 2020, H.E.
Nazeer v Noah [2024] DIFC ARB 011: The Limits of Raising Foreign Law Objections in Arbitration
Justice Rene Le Miere clarifies the waiver doctrine and the high threshold for public policy challenges in the DIFC. On 15 August 2024, Justice Rene Le Miere dismissed Nazeer’s application to set aside an arbitral award, ordering the Claimant to pay USD 132,000 in indemnity costs.
Novak v Newland [2024] DIFC ARB 020: The High Threshold for Public Policy Challenges in Guarantee Enforcement
How the DIFC Courts are insulating international arbitral awards from the volatility of onshore insolvency proceedings. On 1 August 2024, H.E.
Edward Dubai v Eevi Real Estate [2015] DIFC ARB 002: The High Cost of Procedural Obstruction
How Justice Sir David Steel and Deputy Chief Justice Sir John Chadwick dismantled a campaign of tactical delay in the enforcement of a USD 264 million award.
Georgia Corporation v Gavino Supplies [2016] DIFC ARB 005: The Limits of Procedural Obstruction in Award Enforcement
Justice Roger Giles clarifies the high threshold for stay applications and the stringent proportionality test for RDC 19 disclosure requests.
YYY Limited v ZZZ Limited [2017] DIFC ARB 005: The Jurisdictional Tug-of-War and the Limits of the Joint Judicial Committee Stay
How a procedural stay under Decree 19 of 2016 paralyzed interim relief and redefined the enforcement of foreign judgments in the DIFC