LITT
Try LITT free
PETER MATTHEW JAMES GRAY v GIBSON DUNN AND CRUTCHER [2016] DIFC CA 012 — Court of Appeal confirms mandatory stay of proceedings in favor of arbitration (12 March 2017)
The litigation arose from the termination of Peter Matthew James Gray’s employment with the international law firm Gibson Dunn and Crutcher. Mr. Gray initiated proceedings seeking various declarations, indemnities, and monetary compensation, alleging that he had been wrongfully dismissed.
PETER MATTHEW JAMES GRAY v GIBSON DUNN AND CRUTCHER [2018] DIFC CA 012 — Consent order for costs settlement (24 July 2018)
The dispute centered on the recovery of legal costs incurred by Gibson Dunn and Crutcher LLP during the proceedings of CFI-012-2016 and the subsequent appeal, CA-012-2016. Following the conclusion of the underlying litigation, the parties reached a negotiated settlement to avoid further protracted…
PETER MATTHEW JAMES GRAY v GIBSON DUNN & CRUTCHER [2017] DIFC CA 012 — Costs liability following unsuccessful challenge to arbitration agreement (27 April 2017)
The lawsuit originated from a dispute regarding the enforcement of a binding arbitration agreement between Peter Matthew James Gray and the law firm Gibson Dunn & Crutcher (GDC). After initially agreeing to the existence of an arbitration clause while the matter was before the Small Claims Tribunal…