LITT
Try LITT free
GRAND VALLEY GENERAL TRADING v GGICO SUNTECK [2019] DIFC CA 007 — Default judgment set aside for improper service (03 October 2019)
The Court of Appeal confirms that strict adherence to service requirements under the Rules of the DIFC Courts is a prerequisite for the validity of a default judgment, regardless of the merits of the underlying claim.
GRAND VALLEY GENERAL TRADING v GGICO SUNTECK [2019] DIFC CA 007 — Setting aside default judgments for improper service (11 November 2019)
The dispute arose from a deadlocked joint venture, GGICO Sunteck Limited (GSL), between Grand Valley General Trading LLC (GVGL) and Sunteck Lifestyles Limited (SLL). GVGL obtained a default judgment dissolving GSL without SLL being a party to the proceedings.