LITT
Try LITT free
TR88HOUSE RESTAURANT AND ENTERTAINMENT CENTRE v BOND INTERIOR DESIGN [2024] DIFC CA 006 — Costs adjudication following consent order (20 November 2024)
The Court of Appeal clarifies the strict application of RDC Part 32 costs consequences, confirming that informal settlement attempts do not override the financial implications of a rejected Part 32 offer.
TR88house Restaurant And Entertainment Centre v Bond Interior Design [2024] DIFC CA 006 — Appeal costs and double-counting rectification (18 September 2024)
The DIFC Court of Appeal clarifies the application of RDC Part 32 cost consequences in the context of a consent-based reduction of a judgment sum due to double-counting errors.
TR88HOUSE RESTAURANT AND ENTERTAINMENT CENTER v BOND INTERIOR DESIGN [2024] DIFC CA 006 — Consent order correcting double-counted retentions (21 August 2024)
The litigation centered on a construction contract dispute where the primary point of contention, following the initial judgment by Justice Wayne Martin, involved the calculation of retentions.