LITT
Try LITT free
AL KHORAFI v BANK SARASIN-ALPEN [2016] DIFC CA 003 — Costs allocation and payment on account (12 April 2016)
The dispute centers on the recovery of legal costs following the Court of Appeal’s decision dated 3 March 2016. The court determined that the Respondents were entitled to recover their costs of the appeal, subject to an assessment by the Registrar on a standard basis if the parties could not reach…
RAFED ABDEL MOHSEN BADER AL KHORAFI v BANK SARASIN-ALPEN [2015] DIFC CA 003 — procedural extension for Respondent’s Notice (21 April 2015)
The dispute arises from complex litigation involving Rafed Abdel Mohsen Bader Al Khorafi, Amrah Ali Abdel Latif Al Hamad, and Alia Mohamed Sulaiman Al Rifai against Bank Sarasin-Alpen (ME) Limited and Bank Sarasin & Co. Ltd.
RAFED ABDEL MOHSEN BADER AL KHORAFI v BANK SARASIN-ALPEN [2015] DIFC CA 003 — Procedural extension for appellate filings (26 April 2015)
This order addresses the procedural management of appellate timelines within the DIFC Court of Appeal, specifically concerning the deadline for filing a Respondents’ Notice in a complex banking dispute.
RAFED ABDEL MOHSEN BADER AL KHORAFI v BANK SARASIN-ALPEN [2015] DIFC CA 003 — Synchronizing appellate procedural timelines (23 March 2015)
The litigation involves a complex dispute between Rafed Abdel Mohsen Bader Al Khorafi, Amrah Ali Abdel Latif Al Hamad, and Alia Mohamed Sulaiman Al Rifai (the Claimants) and the two defendants, Bank Sarasin-Alpen (ME) Limited and Bank Sarasin & Co. Ltd.