LITT
Try LITT free
Expresso Telecom Group v Tarig H.A.G Rahamtalla [2022] DIFC CA 002 — Clarifying the scope of Article 19 penalty accrual (02 September 2022)
The DIFC Court of Appeal affirms that an employer’s unilateral counterclaim for alleged breaches of fiduciary duty does not suspend the statutory penalty clock for late payment of terminal benefits under the DIFC Employment Law.
TARIG H.A.G. RAHAMTALLA v EXPRESSO TELECOM GROUP [2022] DIFC CA 002 — procedural management of appellate filings (23 June 2022)
The litigation concerns an appeal brought by Expresso Telecom Group against Tarig H.A.G. Rahamtalla. Following an initial application for permission to appeal, the parties engaged in a series of filings, including a Second Permission Application submitted by the appellant on 14 January 2022 and a…