LITT
Try LITT free
Ang Cheng Guan Construction Pte Ltd v Corporate Residence Pte Ltd [2017] SGHC 9
In Ang Cheng Guan Construction Pte Ltd v Corporate Residence Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Building and construction law — Dispute resolution.
TT International Ltd v Ho Lee Construction Pte Ltd [2017] SGHC 62
Clause 31.4(2) of the PSSCOC exhaustively sets out the sums recoverable upon termination for convenience, and does not permit the recovery of loss of profits for uncompleted work.
Linkforce Pte Ltd v Kajima Overseas Asia Pte Ltd [2017] SGHC 46
In Linkforce Pte Ltd v Kajima Overseas Asia Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Building and construction law — Dispute resolution.
Metropole Pte Ltd v Designshop Pte Ltd [2017] SGHC 45
In Metropole Pte Ltd v Designshop Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Building and Construction Law — Terms, Building and Construction Law — Statutes and regulations.
Mansource Interior Pte Ltd v CSG Group Pte Ltd [2017] SGHC 41
In Mansource Interior Pte Ltd v CSG Group Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Building and Construction Law — Statutes and regulations, Building and Construction Law — Building and construction contracts.
Rong Shun Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd v C.P. Ong Construction Pte Ltd [2017] SGHC 34
In Rong Shun Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd v C.P. Ong Construction Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Building and Construction Law — Sub-contracts, Building and Construction Law — Statutes and regulations.
Bintai Kindenko Pte Ltd v Samsung CT Corp [2017] SGHC 321
In Bintai Kindenko Pte Ltd v Samsung CT Corp, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Building and Construction Law — Dispute resolution.
CMC Ravenna Singapore Branch v CGW Construction & Engineering (S) Pte Ltd [2017] SGHC 263
The Singapore High Court dismissed the application to set aside an adjudication review determination in CMC Ravenna v CGW Construction & Engineering. The court affirmed the finality of the decision, ruling that errors of law regarding the adjudicated sum are not grounds for setting aside.
OGSP Engineering Pte Ltd v Comfort Management Pte Ltd [2017] SGHC 247
In OGSP Engineering Pte Ltd v Comfort Management Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Building and construction law — Statute and regulations, Building and construction law — Dispute resolution.
Smile Inc Dental Surgeons Pte Ltd v OP3 International Pte Ltd [2017] SGHC 246
In Smile Inc Dental Surgeons Pte Ltd v OP3 International Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Building and Construction Law — Contractors' duties, Building and Construction Law — Damages.
Strategic Construction Pte Ltd v JH Projects Pte Ltd [2017] SGHC 238
In Strategic Construction Pte Ltd v JH Projects Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Companies — Winding up, Building and construction law — Statutes and regulations.
Hua Rong Engineering Pte Ltd v Civil Tech Pte Ltd [2017] SGHC 179
In Hua Rong Engineering Pte Ltd v Civil Tech Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Building and construction law — Sub-contracts, Building and construction law — Statutes and regulations.
Kingsford Construction Pte Ltd v A Deli Construction Pte Ltd [2017] SGHC 174
In Kingsford Construction Pte Ltd v A Deli Construction Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Building and construction law — Statutes and regulations, Building and construction law — Dispute resolution.
AES Façade Pte Ltd v WYSE Pte Ltd [2017] SGHC 171
In AES Façade Pte Ltd v WYSE Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Building and construction law — Sub-contracts, Building and construction law — Statutes and regulations.
Audi Construction Pte Ltd v Kian Hiap Construction Pte Ltd [2017] SGHC 165
In Audi Construction Pte Ltd v Kian Hiap Construction Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Building and construction law — Statutes and regulations.
UES Holdings Pte Ltd v KH Foges Pte Ltd [2017] SGHC 114
In UES Holdings Pte Ltd v KH Foges Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Building and Construction Law — Dispute resolution, Building and Construction Law — Statutes and regulations.
Tactic Engineering Pte Ltd (in liquidation) v Sato Kogyo (S) Pte Ltd [2017] SGHC 103
The Singapore High Court set aside an injunction against Sato Kogyo (S) Pte Ltd, ruling that Tactic Engineering failed to prove unconscionability in the calling of a performance bond. The court upheld the contractual risk allocation despite Tactic's liquidation, emphasizing the high threshold for re
Mataban Development Pte Ltd v Black Knight Warrior Pte Ltd [2017] SGHCR 12
In Mataban Development Pte Ltd v Black Knight Warrior Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Building and Construction Law — Dispute Resolution.
Doka Formwork Pte Ltd v Grandbuild Construction Pte Ltd [2016] SGHC 248
In Doka Formwork Pte Ltd v Grandbuild Construction Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Building and Construction Law — Damages.
JFC Builders Pte Ltd v Permasteelisa Pacific Holdings Ltd [2016] SGHC 247
The definition of 'construction work' in s 3(1) of the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act does not import the common law on fixtures; the test is one of fact and degree regarding whether the works form part of the land.
CAA Technologies Pte Ltd v Newcon Builders Pte Ltd [2016] SGHC 246
In CAA Technologies Pte Ltd v Newcon Builders Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Building and construction law — Building and construction contracts, Building and construction law — Sub-contracts.
Geocon Piling & Engineering Pte Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) v Multistar Holdings Ltd (formerly known as Multi-Con Systems Ltd) and another suit [2016] SGHC 240
The court held that the subcontract between the parties was a lump sum contract subject to variations, not a reimbursement contract, and that the plaintiff's claims were not time-barred as the cause of action accrued upon finalisation of accounts.
Hauslab Design & Build Pte Ltd v Vinod Kumar Ramgopal Didwania [2016] SGHC 222
In Hauslab Design & Build Pte Ltd v Vinod Kumar Ramgopal Didwania, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Building and construction law — Dispute resolution.
DSL Integrated Solution Pte Ltd v Triumph Electrical System Engineering Pte Ltd [2022] SGHC 221
In DSL Integrated Solution Pte Ltd v Triumph Electrical System Engineering Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Building and Construction Law — Termination, Building and Construction Law — Contractors’ duties.