LITT
Try LITT free
Store+Deliver+Logistics Pte Ltd v Chin Siew Gim (trading as S G Chin and Associates) [2012] SGHC 89
that Expedite succeeded under its claim in the sum of $418,231.91 whereas the plaintiff succeeded under its counterclaim in the sum of $87,134.36. The result was a net sum of $331,097.55 due from the plaintiff to Expedite, along with interest at 6% per annum. The plaintiff’s claims 20 The plaintiff’
Ser Kim Koi v GTMS Construction Pte Ltd [2016] SGCA 7
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal in Ser Kim Koi v GTMS Construction Pte Ltd, setting aside previous judgments and ordering the release of $640,816.32 to the Appellant, affirming that architect certificates can be challenged in cases of manifest irregularity.