The article explores the interplay between the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, and the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, focusing on Section 13 and Section 37, judicial interpretations, and the need for clarity to ensure minimal interference and efficient dispute resolution.

In Parsvnath Developers v. Brig. Devendra Singh Yadav, the Punjab & Haryana High Court held that the "seat" of arbitration determines court jurisdiction, not the "venue," and an Order VII Rule 10 CPC order is non-appealable under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act.