LITT
Try LITT free
Golden Pacific Shipping & Holdings Pte Ltd v Arc Marine Engineering Pte Ltd [2024] SGHC 15
In Golden Pacific Shipping & Holdings Pte Ltd v Arc Marine Engineering Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Bailment — Negligence, Damages — Mitigation.
Smart Modular Technologies Sdn Bhd and Another v Federal Express Services (M) Sdn Bhd and Another [2006] SGHC 66
The Singapore High Court dismissed claims against Federal Express, ruling that a courier is not an insurer of goods. The court found the hijacking was unforeseeable and the defendant's security measures met reasonable industry standards, rejecting allegations of employee collusion.
Techking Enterprise Ltd and Another v JFE Consolidators Pte Ltd and Another [2005] SGHC 70
A sub-bailee is liable for the loss of goods if it fails to discharge its duty of care, and the burden of proof rests on the sub-bailee to show it discharged that duty.
Smart Modular Technologies Sdn Bhd and Another v Federal Express (Singapore) Pte Ltd [2004] SGHC 139
The Singapore High Court dismissed the claim against Federal Express (Singapore) Pte Ltd, ruling that no contractual or bailment relationship existed. The court held that the defendant was not the carrier and never held possession of the goods, as it acted solely as an agent for a foreign affiliate.
The "Endurance 1" ex "Tokai Maru" [2000] SGHC 99
In The 'Endurance 1' [2000] SGHC 99, the Singapore High Court dismissed a conversion claim, ruling that the plaintiffs failed to prove a formal demand for possession and had effectively relinquished their rights to the goods through prior commercial conduct.
Holland Leedon Pte Ltd (in liquidation) v C & P Transport Pte Ltd [2013] SGHC 281
In Holland Leedon Pte Ltd (in liquidation) v C & P Transport Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Bailment — Negligence, Contract — Contractual terms.
Antariksa Logistics Pte Ltd and Others v McTrans Cargo (S) Pte Ltd [2012] SGHC 154
In Antariksa Logistics Pte Ltd and Others v McTrans Cargo (S) Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Bailment — Lien, Tort — Conversion.
Nambu PVD Pte Ltd v UBTS Pte Ltd [2021] SGHC 20
In Nambu PVD Pte Ltd v UBTS Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Tort — Negligence, Bailment — Contract.
Alwie Handoyo v Tjong Very Sumito and another and another appeal [2013] SGCA 44
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeals in part, ruling that the respondent failed to prove the element of inducement in his fraudulent misrepresentation claim. The court clarified that while a misrepresentation need not be the sole cause, it must be actively present in the representee's mind.
Ang Sin Hock v Khoo Eng Lim [2010] SGCA 17
In Ang Sin Hock v Khoo Eng Lim [2010] SGCA 17, the Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, ruling that a fresh contract was formed, which bypassed limitation period bars. The court awarded the appellant $270,725 plus interest, though limited cost recovery to 50% due to the nature of the arguments.
Tat Seng Machine Movers Pte Ltd v Orix Leasing Singapore Ltd [2009] SGCA 42
In Tat Seng Machine Movers Pte Ltd v Orix Leasing Singapore Ltd, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Bailment — Bailors, Civil Procedure — Pleadings.
Sun Technosystems Pte Ltd v Federal Express Services (M) Sdn Bhd [2006] SGCA 40
In Sun Technosystems Pte Ltd v Federal Express Services (M) Sdn Bhd, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Bailment — Bailees.
Seah Ting Soon trading as Sing Meng Co Wooden Cases Factory v Indonesian Tractors Co Pte Ltd [2001] SGCA 2
In Seah Ting Soon trading as Sing Meng Co Wooden Cases Factory v Indonesian Tractors Co Pte Ltd, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Bailment — Bailees, Civil Procedure — Appeals.