LITT
Try LITT free
Maybank Kim Eng Securities Pte Ltd v Lim Keng Yong and another [2016] SGHC 68
In Maybank Kim Eng Securities Pte Ltd v Lim Keng Yong and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Arbitration — Stay of court proceedings.
Maniach Pte Ltd v L Capital Jones Ltd and another [2016] SGHC 65
In Maniach Pte Ltd v L Capital Jones Ltd and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Arbitration — Agreement, Arbitration — Arbitrability and Public Policy.
BWF v BWG [2019] SGHC 81
In BWF v BWG, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Arbitration — Agreement, Arbitration — Restraint of proceedings.
BVU v BVX [2019] SGHC 69
In BVU v BVX, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Arbitration — Award.
AQZ v ARA
The court held that relief under s 10(3) of the IAA and Art 16(3) of the Model Law is not available when an arbitral award deals with the merits of the dispute, even if it also contains a ruling on jurisdiction.
CDM & 2 Ors v CDP
An arbitral tribunal does not exceed its jurisdiction or breach natural justice when it decides issues that are within the scope of the parties' pleadings and the agreed list of issues, even if the tribunal's reasoning relies on evidence that was before it.
Jiangsu Overseas Group Co Ltd v Concord Energy Pte Ltd and another matter [2016] SGHC 153
The court held that the Spot and Term contracts were validly concluded between the parties, and therefore the arbitration agreements contained within them were valid, granting the tribunal jurisdiction.
AMZ v AXX
An arbitral award will not be set aside for breach of natural justice where the tribunal's findings were based on a reasoned preference for one party's evidence over another, and where the alleged procedural defects were either non-existent or did not cause actual prejudice to th
Beijing Sinozonto Mining Investment Co Ltd v Goldenray Consortium (Singapore) Pte Ltd
The court held that an allegation of fraud or corruption to resist enforcement of a foreign arbitral award under s 31(4)(b) of the IAA must be proved on a balance of probabilities, with the strength of evidence required being commensurate with the seriousness of the allegation.
ASG v ASH [2016] SGHC 130
A party challenging an arbitration award for breach of natural justice must establish the breach, its connection to the award, and resulting prejudice. The court will not interfere with the merits of an award or conduct a hypercritical analysis of the arbitrator's reasoning.
JVL Agro Industries Ltd v Agritrade International Pte Ltd [2016] SGHC 126
In JVL Agro Industries Ltd v Agritrade International Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Arbitration — Award.
Cassa di Risparmio di Parma e Piacenza SpA v Rals International Pte Ltd
An assignee of a contractual right is bound by an arbitration agreement contained in the underlying contract under the principle of conditional benefit, but a claim on a promissory note issued pursuant to that contract is not necessarily within the scope of that arbitration agree
Mount Eastern Holdings Resources Co., Limited v H&C S Holdings Pte Ltd and another matter [2016] SGHC 1
In Mount Eastern Holdings Resources Co., Limited v H&C S Holdings Pte Ltd and another matter, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Arbitration — award.
Anwar Siraj and another v Teo Hee Lai Building Construction Pte Ltd
An arbitrator has the right to resign for good cause, and the court may grant leave for such discharge where the relationship between the arbitrator and the parties has become acrimonious.
BLB and another v BLC and others
An arbitral award may be set aside under s 24(b) of the IAA and Art 34(2)(a)(iii) of the Model Law where the tribunal fails to address a discrete head of claim submitted to it, resulting in real prejudice.
Coal & Oil Co LLC v GHCL Ltd [2015] SGHC 65
In Coal & Oil Co LLC v GHCL Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Arbitration — Award.
AQZ v ARA [2015] SGHC 49
In AQZ v ARA, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Arbitration — Award.
Sim Chay Koon and others v NTUC Income Insurance Co-operative Ltd [2015] SGHC 43
In Sim Chay Koon and others v NTUC Income Insurance Co-operative Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Arbitration — Stay of court proceedings.
Five Ocean Corporation v Cingler Ship Pte Ltd (PT Commodities & Energy Resources, intervener) [2015] SGHC 311
In Five Ocean Corporation v Cingler Ship Pte Ltd (PT Commodities & Energy Resources, intervener), the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Arbitration — Interlocutory order or direction.
AUF v AUG and other matters [2015] SGHC 305
In AUF v AUG and other matters, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Arbitration — Award, Arbitration — Enforcement.
CYY v CYZ [2023] SGHC 101
In CYY v CYZ, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Arbitration — Arbitral tribunal, Arbitration — Agreement.
AYH v AYI and another [2015] SGHC 300
In AYH v AYI and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Arbitration — Award.
AMZ v AXX [2015] SGHC 283
An arbitral award will not be set aside for breach of natural justice where the tribunal's findings were based on evidence before it and the alleged procedural defects did not cause actual prejudice to the applicant.
Cassa di Risparmio di Parma e Piacenza SpA v Rals International Pte Ltd [2015] SGHC 264
An assignee of a contractual right is bound by an arbitration agreement contained in the underlying contract under the principle of conditional benefit, but a claim on a promissory note issued pursuant to that contract is not necessarily within the scope of that arbitration agree