LITTLITT Try LITT free
Singapore

Soh Beng Tee & Co Pte Ltd v Fairmount Development Pte Ltd [2007] SGCA 28

In Soh Beng Tee & Co Pte Ltd v Fairmount Development Pte Ltd, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Arbitration — Award.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Swift-Fortune Ltd v Magnifica Marine SA [2006] SGCA 42

In Swift-Fortune Ltd v Magnifica Marine SA, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Arbitration — Interlocutory order or direction.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

PT Asuransi Jasa Indonesia (Persero) v Dexia Bank SA [2006] SGCA 41

A negative ruling on jurisdiction by an arbitral tribunal is not an 'award' under the International Arbitration Act and therefore cannot be set aside by the court under Article 34 of the Model Law.

Sushant Shukla· ·13 min read
Singapore

Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd v Sintal Enterprise Pte Ltd [2005] SGCA 10

In Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd v Sintal Enterprise Pte Ltd, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Arbitration — Stay of court proceedings.

Sushant Shukla· ·9 min read
Singapore

Black and Veatch Singapore Pte Ltd v Jurong Engineering Ltd [2004] SGCA 30

In Black and Veatch Singapore Pte Ltd v Jurong Engineering Ltd, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Arbitration — Conduct of arbitration.

Sushant Shukla· ·9 min read
Singapore

Northern Elevator Manufacturing Sdn Bhd v United Engineers (Singapore) Pte Ltd (No 2) [2004] SGCA 11

In Northern Elevator Manufacturing Sdn Bhd v United Engineers (Singapore) Pte Ltd (No 2), the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Arbitration — Award.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

P.T. Garuda Indonesia v Birgen Air [2002] SGCA 12

In P.T. Garuda Indonesia v Birgen Air, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Arbitration — Award, Civil Procedure — Service.

Sushant Shukla· ·9 min read
Singapore

Tang Boon Jek Jeffrey v Tan Poh Leng Stanley [2001] SGCA 46

The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal in Tang Boon Jek Jeffrey v Tan Poh Leng Stanley, ruling that under the UNCITRAL Model Law, an arbitral tribunal is not functus officio until a final award disposing of all claims, including costs, is issued.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

SA Shee & Co (Pte) Ltd v Kaki Bukit Industrial Park Pte Ltd [2000] SGCA 7

In SA Shee & Co (Pte) Ltd v Kaki Bukit Industrial Park Pte Ltd, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Arbitration — Stay of court proceedings, Words and Phrases — "Matters arising under or out of or in connection with".

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Lum Chang Building Contractors Pte Ltd v Anderson Land Pte Ltd [2000] SGCA 18

Case Details * Citation: [2000] SGCA 18 * Case Number: CA 137/1999 * Decision Date: 05 April 2000 * Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore * Coram: Chao Hick Tin JA; Tan Lee Meng J; L

Sushant Shukla· ·14 min read
Singapore

Hong Huat Development Co (Pte) Ltd v Hiap Hong & Co Pte Ltd [2000] SGCA 14

In Hong Huat Development Co v Hiap Hong & Co [2000] SGCA 14, the Court of Appeal clarified that an arbitrator's delay does not constitute misconduct sufficient to set aside an award. The court emphasized that parties must pursue formal appeal procedures rather than collateral challenges.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Def. Lex-O-Pedia
What is the Doctrine of Regulatory Taking in International Investment Law?
The regulatory taking doctrine in international investment law mandates compensation when state regulations significantly impact investments, even without formal expropriation, balancing sovereign regulation and investor protection.
Read full entry
In Re case-study

Case Study: Saipem S.p.A. v. The People’s Republic of Bangladesh

In Saipem S.p.A. v. Bangladesh, ICSID ruled that judicial interference leading to loss of contractual rights is indirect expropriation. This case broadened protection for foreign investors under international investment law.
2025 · 5 min read Held
Judgment
Def. Lex-O-Pedia
What is Most-Favoured-Nation (MFN) Treatment in Investment Treaties?
Most-Favoured-Nation (MFN) treatment ensures foreign investors receive treatment no less favorable than investors from other nations. While promoting non-discrimination, its application in dispute resolution and substantive protections remains debated in investment law.
Read full entry
Def. Lex-O-Pedia
What is the Place and Language of Arbitration?
The place and language of arbitration are crucial in shaping procedural fairness, efficiency, and enforceability. Governed by Sections 20 and 22 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, they ensure party autonomy while allowing tribunals discretion when necessary.
Read full entry
Def. Lex-O-Pedia
What is the procedure for the appointment of an Arbitral Tribunal?
The appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ensures impartiality in arbitration when parties cannot agree on a selection. The Chief Justice plays a pivotal role in ensuring timely, fair, and unbiased tribunal formation.
Read full entry
017
Buzz

Journal on Arbitration Law and Allied Fields - Damodaram Sanjivayya National Law University

Nov 25 ·4 min read