LITT
Try LITT free
uae-difc-cases
HAYRI INTERNATIONAL v HAZIM TELECOM [2017] DIFC ARB 010 — Clarifying the finality of anti-suit injunctions (23 May 2017)
Justice Sir Jeremy Cooke’s clarificatory ruling confirms the finality of the DIFC Court’s determination regarding the seat of arbitration and the enforceability of anti-suit injunctions against parallel foreign proceedings.
·
·5 min read
uae-difc-cases
HAYRI INTERNATIONAL v HAZIM TELECOM [2016] DIFC ARB 010 — The Anti-Suit Injunction as a Shield Against Procedural Sabotage (09 March 2017)
The DIFC Court confirms its authority to restrain foreign litigation through anti-suit injunctions, affirming the primacy of the DIFC-LCIA rules in seat determination.
·
·5 min read
uae-difc-cases
HAYRI INTERNATIONAL v HAZIM TELECOM [2017] DIFC ARB 010 — The Anti-Suit Injunction as a Shield Against Procedural Sabotage
Justice Sir Jeremy Cooke affirms the DIFC Court’s supervisory authority by restraining foreign litigation intended to obstruct arbitration.
·
·6 min read
uae-difc-cases
HAYRI INTERNATIONAL v HAZIM TELECOM [2016] DIFC ARB 010 — Protecting the seat via anti-suit injunction (25 February 2017)
Justice Sir Jeremy Cooke’s order serves as a critical precedent for the DIFC Court’s willingness to restrain foreign litigation that threatens the integrity of a contractually agreed arbitration seat.
·
·5 min read