LITT
Try LITT free
GEORGIA CORPORATION v GAVINO SUPPLIES [2016] DIFC ARB 005 — The Limits of Procedural Obstruction in Award Enforcement (11 October 2016) [#2]
The DIFC Court of First Instance clarifies the high threshold for staying the enforcement of a final arbitral award, rejecting speculative claims of double recovery and improper discovery requests.
GEORGIA CORPORATION v GAVINO SUPPLIES [2016] DIFC ARB 005 — The Limits of Procedural Obstruction in Award Enforcement (11 October 2016) [#1]
The DIFC Court of First Instance affirms its pro-enforcement mandate by rejecting speculative stay applications and fishing expeditions for information in the context of a JPY 3.7 billion arbitral award.