LITT
Try LITT free
The “Yue You 902” and another matter [2019] SGHC 106
Analysis of [2019] SGHC 106, a decision of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore on 2019-04-24.
The "Tian E Zuo" [2018] SGHC 93
Analysis of [2018] SGHC 93, a decision of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore on 2018-04-20.
The “Long Bright” [2018] SGHC 216
Analysis of [2018] SGHC 216, a decision of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore on 2018-10-03.
The “Swiber Concorde” [2018] SGHC 197
Analysis of [2018] SGHC 197, a decision of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore on 2018-09-07.
The "Dream Star" [2017] SGHC 220
Analysis of [2017] SGHC 220, a decision of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore on 2017-09-12.
DSA Consultancy (FZC) v The "Eurohope" [2017] SGHC 218
In DSA Consultancy (FZC) v The "Eurohope", the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Admiralty and shipping — Admiralty jurisdiction and arrest.
The "Posidon" and another matter [2017] SGHC 138
Analysis of [2017] SGHC 138, a decision of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore on 2017-06-07.
The “Sevilla Knutsen [2022] SGHC 20
Analysis of [2022] SGHC 20, a decision of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore on 2022-01-28.
The “STI Orchard” (Winson Oil Trading Pte Ltd, intervener) [2022] SGHCR 6
Analysis of [2022] SGHCR 6, a decision of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore on 2022-05-23.
The “Jeil Crystal” [2022] SGCA 66
Analysis of [2022] SGCA 66, a decision of the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore on 2022-10-17.
The “Ocean Winner” and other matters [2021] SGHC 8
The High Court ruled that filing an admiralty Writ does not breach the section 211B Companies Act moratorium. The court held that such filings are not prohibited legal processes or enforcement steps, meaning no leave of court is required to initiate these proceedings against a company.
The “Caraka Jaya Niaga III-11” [2021] SGHC 43
Analysis of [2021] SGHC 43, a decision of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore on 2021-02-22.
The “Jeil Crystal” [2021] SGHC 292
Analysis of [2021] SGHC 292, a decision of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore on 2021-12-30.
The “Navios Koyo” and other matters [2021] SGHC 131
Analysis of [2021] SGHC 131, a decision of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore on 2021-05-31.
The “Navios Koyo” [2021] SGCA 99
Analysis of [2021] SGCA 99, a decision of the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore on 2021-10-27.
The “Luna” and another appeal [2021] SGCA 84
Analysis of [2021] SGCA 84, a decision of the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore on 2021-08-20.
The “Songa Venus” [2020] SGHC 74
Analysis of [2020] SGHC 74, a decision of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore on 2020-04-15.
AS Fortuna Opco BV and another v Sea Consortium Pte Ltd and others [2020] SGHC 72
In AS Fortuna Opco BV and another v Sea Consortium Pte Ltd and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Admiralty and Shipping — Limitation of liabilities.
The “Echo Star” ex “Gas Infinity” [2020] SGHC 200
Analysis of [2020] SGHC 200, a decision of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore on 2020-09-28.
Thoresen Shipping Singapore Pte Ltd and others v Global Symphony SA and others [2020] SGHC 153
In Thoresen Shipping Singapore Pte Ltd and others v Global Symphony SA and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Admiralty and Shipping — Limitation of liabilities.
The “Miracle Hope” [2020] SGHCR 3
Analysis of [2020] SGHCR 3, a decision of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore on 2020-05-27.
Toptip Holding Pte Ltd v Mercuria Energy Trading Pte Ltd and another appeal [2017] SGCA 64
In Toptip Holding Pte Ltd v Mercuria Energy Trading Pte Ltd and another appeal, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Admiralty and Shipping — Carriage of goods by sea, Contract — Formation.
UNITED OVERSEAS BANK LIMITED v Owner and/or Demise Charterer of the vessel MAERSK KATALIN (IMO No. 9431317)
A carrier is liable for misdelivery of cargo if it delivers the cargo without presentation of the original bills of lading, and the carrier's breach of contract is the effective cause of the loss, notwithstanding the holder's financing arrangements.
Likpin International Ltd v Swiber Holdings Ltd and another [2016] SGCA 48
In Likpin International Ltd v Swiber Holdings Ltd and another, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Admiralty and Shipping — Admiralty jurisdiction and arrest, Civil Procedure — Striking Out.