LITTLITT Try LITT free
Singapore

MANAGEMENT CORPORATION STRATA TITLE PLAN NO. 4348 v HOI HUP SUNWAY PASIR RIS PTE. LTD. & 14 Ors

The court dismissed an application for extension of time to file for summary determination of a question of law, finding that the applicant failed to show good cause for a three-year delay and did not proceed with diligence.

Sushant Shukla· ·15 min read
Singapore

SREE RAM CONSTRUCTION PTE LTD v GREEN TAG SCAFFOLDING PTE LTD & Anor

The Rules of Court 2021 do not mandate that a defendant must bring all claims against a claimant as a counterclaim in the existing action; the rules enable but do not compel a defendant to bring a counterclaim.

Sushant Shukla· ·14 min read
Singapore

UBS SWITZERLAND AG v KOCH SHIPPING PTE LTD & Anor

The court granted a stay of proceedings on the ground of forum non conveniens, finding that Switzerland was the clearly more appropriate forum for the dispute, as the key witnesses were resident there and Swiss law governed the underlying security agreements.

Sushant Shukla· ·15 min read
Singapore

ORO NEGRO DRILLING PTE. LTD. & 5 Ors v INTEGRADORA DE SERVICIOS PETROLEROS ORO NEGRO, S.A.P.I. DE C.V. & 6 Ors

An 'unless' order is warranted when a party intentionally fails to comply with court-ordered interrogatories, particularly when the failure prejudices the fair trial of the proceedings and the justifications offered are collateral attacks on prior court decisions.

Sushant Shukla· ·13 min read
Singapore

XBV v XBU

An appeal against a subsequent order that effectively seeks to challenge an earlier order for which the time to appeal has expired is procedurally defective and devoid of merit.

Sushant Shukla· ·14 min read
Singapore

XLM v XLN

The Singapore court should be slow to intervene in interim maintenance applications when divorce proceedings are pending in another appropriate forum (India).

Sushant Shukla· ·11 min read
Singapore

WVH & Anor v WVG

The court enforced a settlement agreement regarding the deputyship of an elderly person with dementia, finding that the children were the more appropriate deputies for property and affairs, and that the settlement agreement was in the person's best interests.

Sushant Shukla· ·12 min read
Singapore

XSG v XSF

The court dismissed the application for a stay of proceedings on the ground of forum non conveniens, finding that Singapore was the forum with the closest and most real connection to the parties, particularly given their bankruptcy status and domicile.

Sushant Shukla· ·14 min read
Singapore

Neo Tiam Ting v Singapore Vehicle Traders Association

The President of an unincorporated association has the power to suspend a general meeting if it is being conducted contrary to the constitution, but does not have the power to reconvene a suspended meeting after the members have dispersed, unless specifically authorised by the co

Sushant Shukla· ·12 min read
Singapore

DJP & 2 Ors v DJO

An arbitral award may be set aside for breach of natural justice where the tribunal's extensive and unthinking reproduction of material from parallel arbitrations gives rise to a reasonable apprehension of apparent bias and demonstrates a failure to independently apply its mind t

Sushant Shukla· ·14 min read
Singapore

TEY SONG KIEM MRS GOH CHEOW MIANG v MOHD JAFFAR BIN ISMAIL practising as FFUSION ARCHITECTS (Singapore UEN No. XXXXXXXXM) & Anor

An architect does not owe a duty of care to a third party for the operational design or supervision of installation of an automated gate if such tasks fall outside the scope of their architectural services. A contractor who constructs and installs such a gate owes a duty of care

Sushant Shukla· ·14 min read
Singapore

BCH HOTEL INVESTMENT PTE LTD TRADING AS INTERCONTINENTAL SINGAPORE v SEMTEC HOLDINGS PTE. LTD. & Anor

Committal proceedings for civil contempt require proof beyond reasonable doubt that the failure to comply with a court order was intentional, meaning the contemnor had the means to comply but deliberately chose not to.

Sushant Shukla· ·13 min read
Singapore

CLARENCE LUN YAODONG v DENTONS RODYK & DAVIDSON LLP

The court held that a dispute over the validity of a retainer agreement is not an essential element of a solicitor-and-client costs assessment proceeding, and thus does not warrant a stay of the assessment proceedings in favour of arbitration.

Sushant Shukla· ·14 min read