LITT
Try LITT free
Siti Hajar bte Abdullah v Public Prosecutor [2006] SGHC 24
A 'special reason' for exemption from mandatory disqualification under s 3(3) of the MVA must be a mitigating or extenuating circumstance directly connected with the commission of the offence, not merely a circumstance peculiar to the offender.
Nautical Concept Pte Ltd v Jeffery Mark Richard and Another [2006] SGHC 239
An application for a trade mark is made in bad faith if it involves dealings that fall short of standards of acceptable commercial behaviour, even if the marks are not identical or confusingly similar.
Smith & Associates Far East Ltd v Britestone Pte Ltd [2006] SGHC 238
A buyer can recover damages from a seller for a settlement paid to a third party in a chain of contracts if the damages were within the reasonable contemplation of the parties at the time of the contract.
Ng Geok Eng v Public Prosecutor [2006] SGHC 232
Market rigging and false trading offences under s 197(1) SFA should attract custodial sentences in appropriate cases to deter market manipulation, and the sentencing approach for unauthorised share trading under s 201(b) SFA should distinguish between cases involving deception of
Abdul Aziz bin Mohamed Yatim v Rubiah bte Rahmat [2006] SGHC 231
Civil contempt proceedings are quasi-criminal in nature and personal to the alleged contemnor; therefore, they abate upon the death of the alleged contemnor and cannot be continued against their personal representative.
Lock Yeng Fun (mw) v Chua Hock Chye [2006] SGHC 230
The court held that in a long marriage where the wife's financial contributions were minimal but she performed the role of homemaker, an award of 40% of the matrimonial assets was just and equitable.
Gan Too Cheh v Public Prosecutor [2006] SGHC 23
Findings of fact by a trial judge based on the credibility of witnesses should not be overturned unless they are plainly wrong or against the weight of the evidence.
Spandeck Engineering (S) Pte Ltd v Defence Science & Technology Agency [2006] SGHC 229
The court held that the defendant, as the superintending officer, did not owe a duty of care to the plaintiff (the main contractor) for pure economic loss in the context of a building contract where the plaintiff had other contractual remedies against the employer.
Navaseelan Balasingam v Public Prosecutor [2006] SGHC 228
The court held that the totality principle should not be applied in a way that unduly constrains the aggregate sentence when multiple distinct offences are committed, and that imprisonment sentences may be backdated to the date of arrest.
Terence Yeo Guan Chye and Another v Lau Siew Kim [2006] SGHC 227
The court held that amendments to pleadings on the last day of trial may be granted if any resulting prejudice to the opposing party can be compensated by costs.
Ee Kee Chai v Chew Joo Song John and Others [2006] SGHC 225
An ex parte order for the appointment of provisional liquidators will be set aside if the applicant fails to disclose material facts to the court.
Progen Engineering Pte Ltd v Winter Engineering (S) Pte Ltd [2006] SGHC 224
The court held that an arbitrator's unilateral fixing of fees does not constitute a valid reason for a party's delay in appealing an award, and that the court will not exercise its discretion to extend time for an appeal where the delay is substantial and the party has failed to
Sunny Metal & Engineering Pte Ltd v Ng Khim Ming Eric (practising under the name and style of W P Architects) [2006] SGHC 222
In cases of concurrent liability in contract and tort, the stricter contractual rules of remoteness apply. The court also affirmed the 'two-stage process' for determining duty of care in negligence for pure economic loss.
Chua Kim Leng (Cai Jinling) v Phillip Securities Pte Ltd [2006] SGHC 221
The court held that an exchange of emails between the parties constituted a binding contract for the sharing of commission from a share offer, and that the plaintiff was entitled to her share of the commission, which was to be set off against her loan obligations.
Lee Hsien Loong v Singapore Democratic Party and Others and Another Suit [2006] SGHC 220
Politicians have the right to sue for defamation in their personal capacity if defamatory statements about the government or political institutions are capable of being understood to refer to them.
Anthony Wee Soon Kim v The Law Society of Singapore [2006] SGHC 219
A solicitor is not required to verify the accuracy of a client's instructions embodied in an affidavit unless there is evidence the solicitor knew or had reason to believe the statement was false.
Banque Cantonale Vaudoise v Fujitrans (Singapore) Pte Ltd [2006] SGHC 217
A party seeking discovery in a subsequent application must show that circumstances have substantially changed since the first application to warrant a different view, otherwise the application may be dismissed as a fishing expedition.
Law Society of Singapore v Tan Buck Chye Dave [2006] SGHC 216
A solicitor was suspended for grossly improper conduct after offering monetary incentives to third parties to secure conveyancing work. This breach of the Legal Profession Act highlights the court's strict stance against unethical client procurement.
Trek Technology (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Ritronics Components (S'pore) Pte Ltd [2006] SGHC 215
Interrogatories are generally not appropriate after a trial has commenced, as the appropriate mechanism for eliciting information at that stage is cross-examination.
Wee Soon Kim Anthony v Law Society of Singapore [2006] SGHC 214
The court held that the appeal procedure under s 96 of the Legal Profession Act is only available for specific determinations by the Council, and that the Council's decision to exempt a transaction under r 34(c) of the Legal Profession (Professional Conduct) Rules is not subject
Public Prosecutor v Gelau Anak Jimbat [2006] SGHC 212
The court held that in sentencing for culpable homicide, the fact that the accused pursued the victim and stabbed him multiple times while the victim was fleeing outweighs the mitigating factor that the victim may have been the initial aggressor.
Goh Nellie v Goh Lian Teck and Others [2006] SGHC 211
The court held that s 56(1) of the Trustees Act cannot be used to sanction a sale of trust property where the trust instrument contains an express prohibition against such a sale. The court also found that the issue of whether the beneficiaries had a veto over the sale of the pro
Tay Way Bock v Yeunh Oi Siong [2006] SGHC 21
A stay of proceedings on the grounds of forum non conveniens is granted where the court is satisfied that there is another available forum that is clearly more appropriate for the trial of the action, and the plaintiff fails to show special circumstances requiring the trial to re
Veolia Water Systems (SEA) Pte Ltd v Engineered Products and Services Pte Ltd and Others [2006] SGHC 208
The court held that the plaintiff failed to prove that the defendants converted the items or breached confidence, and that the restrictive covenants in the employment contract ceased upon the termination of employment.