Latest articles
BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2022] DIFC CFI 033 — Procedural dismissal of stay application (23 March 2022)
The underlying litigation involves Bankmed (SAL), operating under the trade name Bankmed (Dubai), and a series of six defendants, including Fast Telecom General Trading LLC and the Third Defendant, Mohammed Jawdat Ayesh Mustafa Al Bargouthi.
BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2021] DIFC CFI 033 — Extension of time for expert evidence on forgery (08 December 2021)
The litigation involves a banking claim brought by Bankmed (SAL), trading as Bankmed (Dubai), against Fast Telecom General Trading LLC and five individual defendants. The core of the dispute centers on the enforceability of a Facility Agreement and a related Guarantee, which form the basis of the…
BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2021] DIFC CFI 033 — Adjournment of immediate judgment pending forgery investigation (11 October 2021)
The core of the dispute in CFI 033/2017 concerns the enforceability of a Facility Agreement (FA) and a First Demand Limited Personal Guarantee, both purportedly dated 22 December 2015.
BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2021] DIFC CFI 033 — Retrospective extension of time for procedural compliance (15 August 2021)
The underlying dispute in CFI 033/2017 involves Bankmed (SAL), operating under the trade name Bankmed (Dubai), and a series of six defendants, including Fast Telecom General Trading LLC and various individual co-defendants.
BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2021] DIFC CFI 033 — Amended order regarding legal representation and evidence filing timelines (04 May 2021)
The Registrar’s amended order clarifies the procedural latitude afforded to individual defendants in complex multi-party litigation, specifically regarding the appointment of barristers and the sequencing of evidence.
BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2021] DIFC CFI 033 — Variation of stay pending police investigation (16 February 2021)
The litigation involves Bankmed (SAL), operating in the DIFC as Bankmed (Dubai), pursuing claims against Fast Telecom General Trading LLC and five individual defendants, including the Third Defendant, Mohammed Jawdat Ayesh Mustafa Al Barguthi.
BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2021] DIFC CFI 033 — Temporary stay of proceedings pending police investigation (21 January 2021)
The dispute in CFI 033/2017 involves Bankmed (SAL), operating under the trade name Bankmed (Dubai), and a series of six defendants, including Fast Telecom General Trading LLC and various individuals. The litigation concerns substantial commercial claims brought by the bank.
BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2021] DIFC CFI 033 — stay of proceedings pending police investigation (17 January 2021)
The litigation in CFI 033/2017 involves a claim brought by Bankmed (SAL), operating within the DIFC under the trade name Bankmed (Dubai), against a primary corporate entity, Fast Telecom General Trading LLC, and five individual defendants.
BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2020] DIFC CFI 033 — Default judgment against Second Defendant (16 September 2020)
The lawsuit concerns a substantial commercial banking dispute initiated by Bankmed (SAL) against Fast Telecom General Trading LLC and five individual defendants, including Ali Mohammed Salem Abu Adas.
BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2020] DIFC CFI 033 — Procedural ultimatum on jurisdictional challenges (12 August 2020)
The lawsuit involves a claim brought by Bankmed (SAL) against Fast Telecom General Trading LLC and five individual defendants, including Ali Mohammed Salem Abu Adas (the Second Defendant).
BANKMED v MOHAMMED JAWDAT AYESH MUSTAFA AL BARGUTHI [2020] DIFC CFI 033 — Stay of expert proceedings pending criminal investigation (02 April 2020)
The litigation involves Bankmed (SAL), operating within the DIFC, and a series of defendants, including the Third Defendant, Mohammed Jawdat Ayesh Mustafa Al Barguthi. The core of the procedural conflict centers on the validity of certain documents—referred to as the "Disputed Documents"—which form…
BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2020] DIFC CFI 033 — procedural extension of time for reply (17 March 2020)
The lawsuit involves Bankmed (SAL), trading in the DIFC under the trade name Bankmed (Dubai), as the Claimant, and a series of six defendants, including Fast Telecom General Trading LLC and various individuals, including the Third Defendant, Mohammed Jawdat Ayesh Mustafa Al Barguthi.
BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2020] DIFC CFI 033 — Independence of Personal Guarantees from Arbitration Agreements (22 January 2020)
The Third Defendant, Mohammed Jawdat Ayesh Mustafa Al Barguthi, sought to halt the litigation initiated by Bankmed (SAL) by arguing that the dispute was contractually bound to arbitration.
BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2020] DIFC CFI 033 — Judicial Officer order permitting withdrawal of legal representation (16 January 2020)
The underlying litigation, CFI-033-2017, involves a complex commercial dispute between the claimant, Bankmed (SAL), and a group of six defendants, including Fast Telecom General Trading LLC and Ali Mohammed Salem Abu Adas.
BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2019] DIFC CFI 033 — Procedural order regarding legal representation (23 December 2019)
This order formalizes the withdrawal of legal counsel from the record in a multi-party commercial dispute, clarifying the procedural requirements for firms seeking to cease representation of a defendant in the DIFC Courts.
BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADINGS [2019] DIFC CFI 033 — Permission to appeal granted on compelling grounds (12 September 2019)
The underlying litigation, CFI-033-2017, involves Bankmed (SAL) and a series of defendants, including Fast Telecom General Tradings LLC and several individuals, among them the Fourth Defendant, Saif Saeed Sulaiman Mohamed Al Mazrouei.
BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADINGS [2019] DIFC CFI 033 — Immediate judgment against guarantor (16 July 2019)
The litigation arises from a default on a USD 15,000,000 facility agreement entered into on 22 December 2015 between Bankmed (SAL) and Fast Telecom General Trading LLC. The facility was intended to finance the wholesale distribution of mobile handsets.
BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2019] DIFC CFI 033 — Permission to appeal default judgment (27 February 2019)
The underlying dispute involves Bankmed (SAL) seeking to enforce financial obligations against Fast Telecom General Trading LLC and several individual defendants, including the Fifth Defendant, Ibrahim Saif Hormodi.
BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2019] DIFC CFI 033 — Permission to appeal granted on compelling grounds (13 January 2019)
The litigation involves Bankmed (SAL), operating in the DIFC under the trade name Bankmed (Dubai), and a group of six defendants, including Fast Telecom General Trading LLC and several individual parties.
BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2019] DIFC CFI 033 — Procedural dismissal of an out-of-time appeal (10 January 2019)
The dispute arises from a complex banking litigation involving Bankmed (SAL) and multiple defendants, including Fast Telecom General Trading LLC and several individual parties, among them the Fifth Defendant, Ibrahim Saif Hormodi.
BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2018] DIFC CFI 033 — procedural relief for late filing of Statement of Defence (16 December 2018)
The dispute involves Bankmed (SAL), operating under the trade name Bankmed (Dubai), as the Claimant against a series of six defendants, including Fast Telecom General Trading LLC and several individuals.
BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2018] DIFC CFI 033 — Procedural dismissal of default judgment application (10 December 2018)
The dispute arises from a commercial claim initiated by Bankmed (SAL), operating under the trade name Bankmed (Dubai), against a group of six defendants, including Fast Telecom General Trading LLC and several individuals.
BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2018] DIFC CFI 033 — Setting aside a default judgment (19 November 2018)
The litigation involves Bankmed (SAL), operating under the trade name Bankmed (Dubai), against a primary corporate entity, Fast Telecom General Trading LLC, and five individual defendants, including the fourth defendant, Saif Saeed Sulaiman Mohamed Al Mazrouei.
BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2018] DIFC CFI 033 — Setting aside default judgment in the interest of justice (12 November 2018)
The dispute arose from a claim by Bankmed (SAL) against Fast Telecom General Trading LLC and several individual defendants, including the Second Defendant, Ali Mohammed Salem Abu Adas, regarding unpaid debts.