Latest articles
HEXAGON HOLDINGS v DUBAI INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CENTRE AUTHORITY [2020] DIFC CFI 013 — Permission to appeal granted (18 May 2020)
The litigation involves Hexagon Holdings (Cayman) Limited as the Claimant against the Dubai International Financial Centre Authority and Dubai International Financial Centre Investments LLC as the Respondents.
HEXAGON HOLDINGS v DUBAI INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CENTRE AUTHORITY [2019] DIFC CFI 013 — Strike-out and immediate judgment on contract termination (25 March 2020)
The DIFC Court of First Instance clarifies the strict procedural requirements for terminating contracts under DIFC law, emphasizing that failure to comply with statutory notice provisions renders purported terminations invalid.
IRAQ TELECOM v ABDULHAMEED ABDULLAH MOHAMMED SALIH AQRAWI [2021] DIFC CFI 013 — Procedural dispensation of service for Notice of Discontinuance (10 August 2021)
The lawsuit, registered under CFI 013/2018, involves a complex multi-party dispute initiated by Iraq Telecom Limited. The litigation has seen numerous procedural developments, including multiple extensions of time for the service of the claim form, as seen in [IRAQ TELECOM v ABDULHAMEED ABDULLAH…
IRAQ TELECOM v ABDULHAMEED ABDULLAH MOHAMMED SALIH AQRAWI [2021] DIFC CFI 013 — Final order of discontinuance (05 August 2021)
The lawsuit, initiated in 2018, involved complex allegations brought by Iraq Telecom Limited against a group of four defendants: Abdulhameed Abdullah Mohammed Salih Aqrawi, Nozad Hussein Jundi, Raymond Samir Zina Rahmeh, and International Holdings Limited.
IRAQ TELECOM v ABDULHAMEED ABDULLAH MOHAMMED SALIH AQRAWI [2021] DIFC CFI 013 — Extension of time for service of claim form (10 February 2021)
The litigation, registered under CFI 013/2018, involves Iraq Telecom Limited as the Claimant against a group of four respondents: Abdulhameed Abdullah Mohammed Salih Aqrawi, Nozad Hussein Jundi, Raymond Samir Zina Rahmeh, and International Holdings Limited.
IRAQ TELECOM LIMITED v AQRAWI [2020] DIFC CFI 013 — Permission for derivative claims and pleading amendments (19 May 2020)
The litigation concerns a minority shareholder, Iraq Telecom Limited, seeking to hold directors accountable for alleged breaches of duty and fraudulent conduct within International Holdings Limited.
IRAQ TELECOM v ABDULHAMEED ABDULLAH MOHAMMED SALIH AQRAWI [2020] DIFC CFI 013 — Extension of time for service of claim form (02 April 2020)
Iraq Telecom Limited initiated proceedings under case number CFI 013/2018 against a group of four defendants, including Abdulhameed Abdullah Mohammed Salih Aqrawi and Nozad Hussein Jundi.
IRAQ TELECOM v ABDULHAMEED ABDULLAH MOHAMMED SALIH AQRAWI [2019] DIFC CFI 013 — Extension of time for service of claim form (17 September 2019)
The dispute involves Iraq Telecom Limited as the Claimant against four named Defendants, including Abdulhameed Abdullah Mohammed Salih Aqrawi, Nozad Hussein Jundi, Raymond Samir Zina Rahmeh, and International Holdings Limited.
IRAQ TELECOM v ABDULHAMEED ABDULLAH MOHAMMED SALIH AQRAWI [2019] DIFC CFI 013 — Extension of time for service of claim form (21 March 2019)
The lawsuit involves Iraq Telecom Limited as the Claimant against four named Defendants: Abdulhameed Abdullah Mohammed Salih Aqrawi, Nozad Hussein Jundi, Raymond Samir Zina Rahmeh, and International Holdings Limited.
IRAQ TELECOM v ABDULHAMEED ABDULLAH MOHAMMED SALIH AQRAWI [2018] DIFC CFI 013 — Procedural extension for service of claim form (12 September 2018)
A procedural examination of the DIFC Court’s exercise of discretion under RDC 7.21 to extend the validity of a Claim Form in complex multi-party litigation.
OGER DUBAI v DAMAN REAL ESTATE CAPITAL PARTNERS [2018] DIFC CFI 013 — Discharge of winding-up and freezing orders (17 October 2018)
The litigation between Oger Dubai LLC and Daman Real Estate Capital Partners Ltd originated from efforts to enforce an arbitral award, which subsequently spiraled into insolvency proceedings within the DIFC Courts.
OGER DUBAI v DAMAN REAL ESTATE CAPITAL PARTNERS [2017] DIFC CFI 013 — Stay of proceedings pending Decree 19 of 2016 Tribunal determination (19 February 2017)
This order confirms the indefinite stay of proceedings in the DIFC Court of First Instance, deferring to the jurisdictional authority of the Tribunal established under Decree 19 of 2016.
OGER DUBAI v DAMAN REAL ESTATE CAPITAL PARTNERS [2017] DIFC CFI 013 — Procedural determination of jurisdictional scope following Joint Judicial Committee intervention (01 February 2017)
The dispute centers on the enforcement efforts initiated by Oger Dubai against Daman Real Estate Capital Partners. Following the commencement of proceedings in CFI 013/2016, the DIFC Court issued various orders supplemental to the Claimant’s enforcement application.
OGER DUBAI v DAMAN REAL ESTATE CAPITAL PARTNERS [2016] DIFC CFI 013 — Stay of winding-up proceedings pending jurisdictional determination (30 June 2016)
The dispute centers on an insolvency petition filed by Oger Dubai LLC against Daman Real Estate Capital Partners Limited. The Claimant, Oger Dubai, sought the winding-up of the Defendant, a real estate entity, due to alleged financial insolvency.
OGER DUBAI v DAMAN REAL ESTATE CAPITAL PARTNERS [2016] DIFC CFI 013 — Immediate cessation of trading following winding-up order (16 June 2016)
The dispute centers on the insolvency of Daman Real Estate Capital Partners, with Oger Dubai acting as the claimant seeking to enforce a winding-up order against the defendant. The litigation, filed under case number CFI 013/2016, reached a critical juncture on 16 June 2016, when the court moved to…
ABU DHABI ISLAMIC BANK v BARCLAYS BANK PLC [2015] DIFC CFI 013 — Extension of time for service of claim form (11 November 2015)
The dispute arises from a formal claim initiated by Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank PJSC against Barclays Bank PLC, registered under case number CFI 013/2015. As is common in high-value banking litigation within the DIFC, the procedural timeline for serving the Claim Form is strictly governed by the Rules…
ABU DHABI ISLAMIC BANK v BARCLAYS BANK [2015] DIFC CFI 013 — procedural extension for service of claim form (10 September 2015)
The dispute centers on a procedural application initiated by Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank (ADIB) against Barclays Bank PLC. Having commenced proceedings under claim number CFI 013/2015, the Claimant found itself unable to complete the formal service of the claim form upon the Defendant within the…
NOZUL HOTELS & RESORTS v DIFC INVESTMENTS [2015] DIFC CFI 013 — Final withdrawal of proceedings by consent (25 February 2015)
The litigation between Nozul Hotels & Resorts and DIFC Investments originated as a dispute within the Court of First Instance, though the specific underlying commercial grievances were ultimately subsumed by the parties' decision to resolve their differences outside the courtroom.
NOZUL HOTELS & RESORTS v DIFC INVESTMENTS [2015] DIFC CFI 013 — Consent order for stay of proceedings (18 February 2015)
The litigation under case number CFI 013/2014 involves a commercial dispute between the Claimant, Nozul Hotels & Resorts, and the Respondent, DIFC Investments. While the specific merits of the claim remain confidential due to the parties' preference for settlement, the procedural history indicates…
NOZUL HOTELS & RESORTS v DIFC INVESTMENTS [2015] DIFC CFI 013 — Consent order for stay of proceedings (19 January 2015)
The dispute between Nozul Hotels & Resorts and DIFC Investments involves complex commercial disagreements that have necessitated multiple procedural pauses to allow the parties to reach an amicable resolution.
NOZUL HOTELS & RESORTS v DIFC INVESTMENTS [2015] DIFC CFI 013 — Consent order for temporary stay of proceedings (11 January 2015)
The litigation under case number CFI 013/2014 involves a commercial dispute between the Claimant, Nozul Hotels & Resorts W.L.L, and the Respondent, DIFC Investments LLC. While the underlying substantive claims remain confidential, the procedural history indicates that the parties reached a critical…
NOZUL HOTELS & RESORTS v DIFC INVESTMENTS [2014] DIFC CFI 013 — Consent order for stay of proceedings (29 December 2014)
The litigation involved a commercial dispute between Nozul Hotels & Resorts W.L.L, acting as the Claimant, and DIFC Investments LLC, acting as the Defendant. While the specific underlying contractual or tortious claims were not detailed in the public record of the consent order, the proceedings…
NOZUL HOTELS & RESORTS v DIFC INVESTMENTS [2014] DIFC CFI 013 — Extension of stay for settlement negotiations (02 July 2014)
The litigation under case number CFI 013/2014 involves a commercial dispute between the Claimant, Nozul Hotels & Resorts W.L.L, and the Defendant, DIFC Investments L.L.C. While the specific underlying causes of action remain confidential within the public record of this procedural order, the matter…
NOZUL HOTELS & RESORTS v DIFC INVESTMENTS [2014] DIFC CFI 013 — Consent order extending stay for settlement negotiations (16 June 2014)
The litigation in CFI 013/2014 involves a commercial dispute between Nozul Hotels & Resorts W.L.L as the Claimant and DIFC Investments L.L.C as the Defendant. While the specific underlying contractual or tortious claims remain confidential within the public record, the procedural history indicates…