§

Latest articles

uae-difc-cases

YUSR ISLAMIC INVESTMENT BANK v AMGAD YOUNES [2010] DIFC CFI 021 — Enforcement of Employment Standards Determination (24 January 2010)

The litigation arose from a challenge brought by Yusr Islamic Investment Bank against a determination issued by the Director of Employment Standards regarding an employment dispute with Amgad Younes.

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

MUZOON HOLDING v BELSONS INNOVATIONS TECHNOLOGIES [2025] DIFC CFI 020 — Assistant Registrar dismisses erroneous Default Costs Certificate request (05 February 2025)

The dispute centers on a procedural misstep by the Defendant, Belsons Innovations Technologies, following an adverse ruling regarding two specific applications: the Permission to Appeal (PTA) Application and the Unless and Sanctions Application.

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

MUZOON HOLDING v BELSONS INNOVATIONS TECHNOLOGIES [2024] DIFC CFI 020 — Unless order and dismissal of PTA (09 December 2024)

The DIFC Court of First Instance reinforces procedural compliance by issuing a terminal unless order against a defendant failing to provide critical software access.

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

MUZOON HOLDING v BELSONS INNOVATIONS TECHNOLOGIES [2024] DIFC CFI 020 — Default costs assessment following failure to file points of dispute (15 October 2024)

The litigation concerns a claim for costs arising from the underlying proceedings in CFI 020/2023. Following the conclusion of the substantive matter, Muzoon Holding sought to recover its legal costs from Belsons Innovations Technologies.

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

MUZOON HOLDING v BELSONS INNOVATIONS TECHNOLOGIES [2024] DIFC CFI 020 — Trial vacated pending sanctions determination (01 October 2024)

The litigation between Muzoon Holding and Belsons Innovations Technologies (formerly Elinx Infotech) centers on a fundamental procedural impasse regarding the production of technical evidence.

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

ACCURACY MIDDLE EAST ADVISORY v ANABEL DEBELAK [2024] DIFC CFI 020 — Consent order amending trial scheduling (09 September 2024)

The litigation between Accuracy Middle East Advisory and Anabel Debelak concerns a dispute brought before the DIFC Court of First Instance under case number CFI 020/2023. While the specific substantive allegations—typically involving contractual obligations or employment covenants in the context of…

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

MUZOON HOLDING LLCB v BELSONS INNOVATIONS TECHNOLOGIES LLC [2024] DIFC CFI 020 — Procedural amendment and software access order (16 August 2024)

The dispute centers on the operational relationship between Muzoon Holding LLCB and the entity previously known as Elinx Infotech LLC. The Claimant initiated proceedings to address issues arising from a Cooperation Agreement dated 30 June 2024, specifically concerning access to the ePMS software.

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

MUZOON HOLDING v ELINX INFOTECH [2024] DIFC CFI 020 — Case Management Order (10 May 2024)

The lawsuit concerns a commercial dispute between Muzoon Holding LLC and Elinx Infotech LLC. While the underlying substantive claims remain confidential, the current stage of the proceedings focuses on the rigorous preparation for trial.

Sushant Shukla· ·4 min read
uae-difc-cases

MUZOON HOLDINGS v ELINX INFOTECH [2024] DIFC CFI 020 — Procedural relief regarding late filing of Defence (16 February 2024)

The litigation between Muzoon Holdings and Elinx Infotech centers on a procedural impasse regarding the timeline for the Defendant’s responsive pleadings. Elinx Infotech sought to file its Defence after the prescribed period had elapsed, necessitating a formal application to the Court to regularize…

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

MUZOON HOLDING v ELINX INFOTECH [2023] DIFC CFI 020 — Default costs assessment following procedural non-compliance (05 October 2023)

The dispute centered on the recovery of legal costs incurred by the Claimant, Muzoon Holding, following the underlying litigation against the Defendant, Elinx Infotech. Having successfully moved for the assessment of its bill of costs, the Claimant sought a total recovery of AED 85,470 as outlined…

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

MUZOON HOLDING v ELINX INFOTECH [2023] DIFC CFI 020 — procedural bar on default judgment (06 September 2023)

The dispute arises from a claim initiated by Muzoon Holding LLC against two respondents: Elinx Infotech LLC and Sharaf Computer Software Trading LLC. Following the commencement of proceedings, the defendants sought to challenge the viability of the claim through an Amended Application filed on 2…

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

MUZOON HOLDING v ELINX INFOTECH [2023] DIFC CFI 020 — Dismissal of application to strike out claim (11 August 2023)

The litigation, initiated by Muzoon Holding LLC, involves a commercial dispute brought before the DIFC Court of First Instance. While the underlying merits of the claim remain the subject of ongoing proceedings, the immediate procedural friction arose from the First Defendant, Elinx Infotech LLC,…

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

MUZOON HOLDING v ELINX INFOTECH [2023] DIFC CFI 020 — Procedural timeline for dismissal application (23 June 2023)

The litigation involves a claim brought by Muzoon Holding against Elinx Infotech. The procedural posture of the case shifted on 2 June 2023, when Elinx Infotech filed an Amended Application Notice, designated as CFI-020-2023/1, seeking the dismissal of the underlying claim.

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

MUZOON HOLDING v ELINX INFOTECH [2023] DIFC CFI 020 — Stay of default judgment pending dismissal application (20 June 2023)

The dispute concerns a claim brought by Muzoon Holding LLC against Elinx Infotech LLC, currently registered under case number CFI 020/2023. The litigation reached a critical procedural juncture when the Claimant, Muzoon Holding, sought to expedite the resolution of its claim by filing a Request for…

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

MUZOON HOLDING v ELINX INFOTECH [2023] DIFC CFI 020 — Procedural extension of time by consent (01 June 2023)

The litigation involves a commercial dispute between Muzoon Holding LLC as the Claimant and Elinx Infotech LLC as the Defendant. While the substantive merits of the claim remain confidential, the procedural posture of the case reached a critical juncture regarding the deadline for the Defendant to…

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

MUZOON HOLDING v ELINX INFOTECH [2023] DIFC CFI 020 — Procedural discontinuance of secondary defendant (31 May 2023)

The litigation initiated by Muzoon Holding LLC involved a multi-party claim against Elinx Infotech LLC as the first defendant and Sharaf Computer Software Trading LLC as the second defendant.

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

ACCURACY MIDDLE EAST ADVISORY v ANABEL DEBELAK [2024] DIFC CFI 020 — Procedural management following the death of a defendant (10 December 2024)

The litigation, registered under CFI 020/2022, involves a claim brought by Accuracy Middle East Advisory Ltd against Anabel Debelak. While the underlying merits of the claim remain pending, the proceedings have encountered a significant procedural hurdle following the notification that the…

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

ACCURACY MIDDLE EAST ADVISORY v ANABEL DEBELAK [2023] DIFC CFI 020 — Procedural directions for set aside application (29 December 2023)

The dispute stems from a Default Judgment entered against Anabel Debelak on 10 January 2023, as ordered by H.E. Justice Maha Al Mheiri. Following the entry of this judgment, the defendant initiated formal proceedings to challenge the court's prior ruling.

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

ACCURACY MIDDLE EAST ADVISORY v ANABEL DEBELAK [2023] DIFC CFI 020 — Default judgment for unpaid advisory fees (10 January 2023)

The lawsuit concerns a commercial dispute arising from an engagement letter dated 1 June 2020, under which Accuracy Middle East Advisory Ltd provided professional services to Anabel Debelak.

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

STORMHARBOUR SECURITIES LP v NOOR BANK [2022] DIFC CFI 020 — Discontinuance following confidential settlement (28 June 2022)

The litigation involved a claim brought by Stormharbour Securities LP against Noor Bank PJSC, a prominent financial institution. While the specific underlying commercial transaction—often involving complex financial advisory or brokerage services typical of Stormharbour’s operations—remained…

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

STORMHARBOUR SECURITIES LP v NOOR BANK [2022] DIFC CFI 020 — Consent order staying proceedings (10 June 2022)

The litigation involved a commercial claim brought by Stormharbour Securities LP against Noor Bank PJSC. While the specific factual allegations regarding the nature of the financial services or contractual breaches were not detailed in the final order, the matter had progressed through the DIFC…

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

STORMHARBOUR SECURITIES LP v NOOR BANK [2022] DIFC CFI 020 — Pre-Trial Review costs order (17 May 2022)

The litigation involves a commercial dispute between Stormharbour Securities LP, acting as the Claimant, and Noor Bank PJSC, acting as the Defendant. While the specific underlying merits of the claim remain subject to ongoing proceedings, the matter is filed under case number CFI 020/2021 within…

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

STORMHARBOUR SECURITIES LP v NOOR BANK [2022] DIFC CFI 020 — Consent order for document production (10 May 2022)

The litigation between Stormharbour Securities LP and Noor Bank PJSC centers on a contractual dispute, specifically involving the negotiation and execution of a Deed. The core of the current procedural impasse concerned the extent of the Claimant’s disclosure obligations regarding communications…

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

STORMHARBOUR SECURITIES LP v NOOR BANK [2022] DIFC CFI 020 — Extension of document production deadlines (16 March 2022)

The litigation between Stormharbour Securities LP and Noor Bank PJSC involves a high-stakes commercial dispute, the specifics of which have necessitated rigorous document production protocols.

Sushant Shukla· ·7 min read