Latest articles
THERON ENTERTAINMENT v MAG FINANCIAL SERVICES [2017] DIFC CFI 021 — Stay of enforcement pending appeal (06 August 2017)
The litigation between Theron Entertainment and MAG Financial Services originated as a claim under CFI 021/2015, which culminated in a substantive judgment issued by H.E. Justice Ali Al Madhani on 11 May 2017.
THERON ENTERTAINMENT v MAG FINANCIAL SERVICES [2017] DIFC CFI 021 — Permission to appeal granted (31 July 2017)
The litigation between Theron Entertainment and MAG Financial Services originated as a claim filed under case number CFI 021/2015. While the specific underlying commercial merits of the dispute involve the contractual relationship between the two entities, the immediate procedural focus of this…
THERON ENTERTAINMENT v MAG FINANCIAL SERVICES [2017] DIFC CFI 021 — Costs allocation and stay of execution pending appeal (29 June 2017)
The litigation between Theron Entertainment and MAG Financial Services involved a complex interplay between a primary claim and a counterclaim, culminating in a substantive judgment delivered by H.E. Justice Ali Al Madhani on 11 May 2017.
Theron Entertainment v MAG Financial Services [2015] DIFC CFI 021 — Termination of tenancy and breach of change-of-use obligations (11 May 2017)
The dispute centered on a failed commercial venture where Theron Entertainment LLC (the "Claimant") sought to establish a restaurant within the Emirates Financial Towers in the DIFC.
THERON ENTERTAINMENT v MAG FINANCIAL SERVICES [2016] DIFC CFI 021 — Pre-trial procedural directions and security for costs (04 May 2016)
The litigation between Theron Entertainment LLC and MAG Financial Services LLC involves a complex commercial dispute that reached a critical juncture in early 2016. The parties appeared before the Court to resolve three distinct procedural applications that threatened to derail the scheduled trial…
THERON ENTERTAINMENT v MAG FINANCIAL SERVICES [2016] DIFC CFI 021 — Judicial Officer dismissal of trial timetable extension (28 March 2016)
The litigation involves a commercial dispute between Theron Entertainment LLC and MAG Financial Services LLC. The matter reached a critical juncture in March 2016 when the Defendant, MAG Financial Services, filed an Application Notice (CFI 021-2015/6) seeking a significant disruption to the…
THERON ENTERTAINMENT v MAG FINANCIAL SERVICES [2016] DIFC CFI 021 — Procedural extension of witness evidence deadlines (14 March 2016)
The litigation involves a commercial dispute between Theron Entertainment LLC and MAG Financial Services LLC, currently pending before the DIFC Court of First Instance. While the substantive merits of the claim remain confidential, the procedural posture of the case reached a critical juncture in…
THERON ENTERTAINMENT v MAG FINANCIAL SERVICES [2015] DIFC CFI 021 — Case management order by consent (07 December 2015)
The litigation involves a commercial dispute between Theron Entertainment LLC and MAG Financial Services LLC. While the specific underlying cause of action remains confidential within the court’s procedural filings, the matter reached the Court of First Instance under case number CFI-021-2015.
THERON ENTERTAINMENT v MAG FINANCIAL SERVICES [2015] DIFC CFI 021 — Interlocutory relief regarding disputed post-dated cheques (24 November 2015)
The litigation centers on a commercial disagreement between Theron Entertainment LLC and MAG Financial Services LLC, wherein the Claimant sought urgent interlocutory relief to prevent the Defendant from realizing or negotiating a series of post-dated cheques.
THERON ENTERTAINMENT v MAG FINANCIAL SERVICES [2015] DIFC CFI 021 — Procedural extension for responsive pleadings (29 September 2015)
The dispute between Theron Entertainment LLC and MAG Financial Services LLC centers on a commercial disagreement that escalated into formal litigation within the DIFC Court of First Instance.
THERON ENTERTAINMENT v MAG FINANCIAL SERVICES [2015] DIFC CFI 021 — procedural timing in default judgment applications (25 August 2015)
The dispute centered on the Claimant’s attempt to secure a default judgment against the Defendant, MAG Financial Services, for failure to respond to the claim within the prescribed timeframe.
ENDOR MANAGEMENT v DOFREEZE [2013] DIFC CFI 021 — Procedural management of complex multi-party litigation (01 September 2013)
The litigation involves Endor Management Limited as the Claimant, initiating proceedings against Dofreeze LLC and other unnamed parties. While the specific underlying commercial grievance is not detailed in the initial procedural order, the filing of the Claim Form marks the commencement of a…
SUPERGEMS M.E. v DAMAN REAL ESTATE CAPITAL PARTNERS [2014] DIFC CFI 021 — Consent order for discontinuance (28 May 2014)
The litigation between Supergems M.E. and Daman Real Estate Capital Partners centered on a complex real estate dispute that had progressed to the appellate stage within the DIFC Courts system.
SUPERGEMS M.E. v DAMAN REAL ESTATE CAPITAL PARTNERS [2013] DIFC CFI 021 — Disclosure of caveat registration details (08 September 2013)
The dispute between Supergems M.E. and Daman Real Estate Capital Partners centers on the procedural transparency of a caveat registered by the Claimant. The Defendant, Daman Real Estate Capital Partners, sought judicial intervention to compel the Claimant to reveal the underlying mechanics and…
SUPERGEMS M.E v DAMAN REAL ESTATE CAPITAL PARTNERS [2013] DIFC CFI 021 — Procedural directions for trial preparation (17 June 2013)
The lawsuit involves a commercial dispute between Supergems M.E Ltd and Daman Real Estate Capital Partners. While the underlying substantive claims remain focused on the parties' respective contractual obligations, the immediate focus of this order is the management of the trial phase.
SUPERGEMS M.E v DAMAN REAL ESTATE CAPITAL PARTNERS [2013] DIFC CFI 021 — Discovery and production disputes (08 May 2013)
This order clarifies the strict application of RDC standards regarding the scope and necessity of document production requests in the DIFC Court of First Instance.
SUPERGEMS M.E v DAMAN REAL ESTATE CAPITAL PARTNERS [2013] DIFC CFI 021 — Strict judicial intervention following procedural non-compliance (19 March 2013)
The dispute between Supergems M.E and Daman Real Estate Capital Partners reached a critical juncture in early 2013 when the parties failed to satisfy the procedural requirements set out in the initial Case Management Order dated 10 January 2013.
AHMED MOHAMED ABDEL AZIZ K SALEH v CHARTIS MEMSA INSURANCE COMPANY [2013] DIFC CFI 021 — Registrar’s stay order for inactivity (14 April 2013)
The DIFC Court of First Instance exercises its administrative oversight to manage dormant litigation through a formal stay of proceedings.
AHMED MOHAMED ABDEL AZIZ K SALEH v CHARTIS MEMSA INSURANCE COMPANY [2012] DIFC CFI 021 — Costs allocation following partial judgment (01 October 2012)
The litigation involved a contentious employment dispute between the Claimant, Ahmed Mohamed Abdel Aziz K Saleh, and the Defendant, Chartis MEMSA Insurance Company. Following a judgment delivered on 5 July 2012, which favored the Defendant regarding a specific application, the parties returned to…
AHMED MOHAMED ABDEL AZIZ SALEH v CHARTIS MEMSA INSURANCE COMPANY [2011] DIFC CFI 021 — Strike out of employment claims (05 July 2012)
The Claimant, Ahmed Mohamed Abdel Aziz Saleh, initiated proceedings against his former employer, Chartis MEMSA Insurance Company, following his termination on 31 January 2011. The total value of the claims brought before the Court was AED 1,510,734.85, encompassing a wide array of heads of damage…
AHMED MOHAMED ABDEL AZIZ K. SALEH v CHARTIS MEMSA INSURANCE COMPANY [2012] DIFC CFI 021 — Procedural management of strike-out applications (28 March 2012)
The litigation concerns a dispute between the Claimant, Ahmed Mohamed Abdel Aziz K. Saleh, and the Defendant, Chartis MEMSA Insurance Company Limited. The immediate procedural conflict arose from the Defendant’s application to strike out the Claimant’s case, which was filed on 22 February 2012.
NORTON ROSE v INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS GROUP [2010] DIFC CFI 021 — Default Judgment (19 October 2010)
The DIFC Court of First Instance exercises its procedural authority to enforce a liquidated debt claim through a summary default mechanism.
NORTON ROSE v INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS GROUP [2010] DIFC CFI 021 — Procedural extension for service of process (05 October 2010)
The dispute in CFI 021/2010 centers on the procedural requirements governing the commencement of litigation within the DIFC Court of First Instance. Norton Rose (Middle East) LLP, acting as the Claimant, initiated proceedings against International Holdings Group LLC but encountered a delay in…
NORTON ROSE v INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS GROUP [2010] DIFC CFI 021 — Procedural compliance in default judgment applications (14 September 2010)
The dispute centers on a procedural application for default judgment initiated by the Claimant, Norton Rose (Middle East) LLP, against the Defendant, International Holdings Group LLC. The Claimant sought to secure a judgment in its favor following the Defendant’s failure to respond to the claim.