Latest articles
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v CHINA RAILWAY TUNNEL GROUP CO., LTD.
In PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v CHINA RAILWAY TUNNEL GROUP CO., LTD., the high_court addressed issues of .
EDDIE TAN TUNG WEE v SINGAPORE HEALTH SERVICES PTE LTD
In EDDIE TAN TUNG WEE v SINGAPORE HEALTH SERVICES PTE LTD, the high_court addressed issues of .
ISABELLE LEW HUEY JIUN & Anor v MICHAEL LEE YU RU & Anor
An application for an extension of time to file an appeal will be dismissed if the proposed appeal is hopeless, and fresh evidence will not be admitted on appeal if it could have been obtained with reasonable diligence at the trial below.
MAERSK TANKERS MR K/S v Owner and/or Demise Charterer of the vessel SWIFT WINCHESTER (IMO No. 9470909)
In MAERSK TANKERS MR K/S v Owner and/or Demise Charterer of the vessel SWIFT WINCHESTER (IMO No. 9470909), the high_court addressed issues of .
Re: HO SALLY
Analysis of [2025] SGHCR 6, a decision of the high_court on .
MANAGEMENT CORPORATION STRATA TITLE PLAN NO. 4348 v HOI HUP SUNWAY PASIR RIS PTE. LTD. & 14 Ors
The court dismissed an application for extension of time to file for summary determination of a question of law, finding that the applicant failed to show good cause for a three-year delay and did not proceed with diligence.
EXTERIAN CAPITAL PTE LTD v ADRIAN WONG JUN JIE & Anor
In EXTERIAN CAPITAL PTE LTD v ADRIAN WONG JUN JIE & Anor, the high_court addressed issues of .
MAYBANK SINGAPORE LIMITED v ELAVARASAN S/O MANOHARAN
In MAYBANK SINGAPORE LIMITED v ELAVARASAN S/O MANOHARAN, the high_court addressed issues of .
SREE RAM CONSTRUCTION PTE LTD v GREEN TAG SCAFFOLDING PTE LTD & Anor
The Rules of Court 2021 do not mandate that a defendant must bring all claims against a claimant as a counterclaim in the existing action; the rules enable but do not compel a defendant to bring a counterclaim.
NASRAT LUCAS MUZAYYIN v THE TYRELL SOLUTION PRIVATE LIMITED & 2 Ors
Case Details * Citation: [2025] SGHCR 38 * Case Number: Originating Claim No 585 of 2025 (Summons No 2515 of 2025) * Decision Date: 10 December 2025 * Court: General Division of the High Court of
GHP FAR EAST LIMITED v NPG GLOBAL PTE LTD & Anor
In GHP FAR EAST LIMITED v NPG GLOBAL PTE LTD & Anor, the high_court addressed issues of .
DR. WHO WATERWORKS PTE. LTD. & 2 Ors v DR. WHO (M) SDN. BHD. & 3 Ors
In DR. WHO WATERWORKS PTE. LTD. & 2 Ors v DR. WHO (M) SDN. BHD. & 3 Ors, the high_court addressed issues of .
UBS SWITZERLAND AG v KOCH SHIPPING PTE LTD & Anor
The court granted a stay of proceedings on the ground of forum non conveniens, finding that Switzerland was the clearly more appropriate forum for the dispute, as the key witnesses were resident there and Swiss law governed the underlying security agreements.
TAJUDIN BIN GULAM RASUL & Anor v SURIAYA BINTE HAJA MOHIDEEN
The court has the inherent power to impose personal costs on advocates and solicitors who cite fictitious AI-generated authorities, based on a three-stage test assessing improper conduct, unnecessary costs, and just compensation.
WESLEY WIDJAJA v NG WEI SAN @ OEI WEI SAN @ WILSON HASAN WIDJAJA & 4 Ors
In WESLEY WIDJAJA v NG WEI SAN @ OEI WEI SAN @ WILSON HASAN WIDJAJA & 4 Ors, the high_court addressed issues of .
C.U. LINES LIMITED. v Owner of the vessel(s) HONG CHANG SHENG (IMO No. 9178525)
Case Details * Citation: [2025] SGHCR 31 * Case Number: Admiralty in Rem No 56 of 2023 (Summons Nos 3473 of 2024) * Decision Date: 22 September 2025 * Court: General Division of the High Court
GLAS SAS (London Branch) v European TopSoho S.À R.L & 2 Ors
In GLAS SAS (London Branch) v European TopSoho S.À R.L & 2 Ors, the high_court addressed issues of .
ORO NEGRO DRILLING PTE. LTD. & 5 Ors v INTEGRADORA DE SERVICIOS PETROLEROS ORO NEGRO, S.A.P.I. DE C.V. & 6 Ors
An 'unless' order is warranted when a party intentionally fails to comply with court-ordered interrogatories, particularly when the failure prejudices the fair trial of the proceedings and the justifications offered are collateral attacks on prior court decisions.
EXCHANGE UNION COMPANY & 3 Ors v WO QI & 11 Ors
In EXCHANGE UNION COMPANY & 3 Ors v WO QI & 11 Ors, the high_court addressed issues of .
ALEKSANDR VIKTOROVICH PROSETSKII v IGOR SMIRNOV & 2 Ors
In ALEKSANDR VIKTOROVICH PROSETSKII v IGOR SMIRNOV & 2 Ors, the high_court addressed issues of .
DYNAMIC OIL TRADING (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD (IN CREDITORS’ VOLUNTARY LIQUIDATION AND RECEIVERSHIP) v DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
In DYNAMIC OIL TRADING (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD (IN CREDITORS’ VOLUNTARY LIQUIDATION AND RECEIVERSHIP) v DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP, the high_court addressed issues of .
L’OREAL & Anor v SHOPEE SINGAPORE PRIVATE LIMITED
In L’OREAL & Anor v SHOPEE SINGAPORE PRIVATE LIMITED, the high_court addressed issues of .
Chern Chye Keow & Anor v Roger Peter Ponniah, Administrator of the Estate of John Danaraj Ponniah, deceased
In Chern Chye Keow & Anor v Roger Peter Ponniah, Administrator of the Estate of John Danaraj Ponniah, deceased, the high_court addressed issues of .
ARMIRA CAPITAL LIMITED v JI ZENGHE & 2 Ors
In ARMIRA CAPITAL LIMITED v JI ZENGHE & 2 Ors, the high_court addressed issues of .