News: “Save Thano” The new Chipko movement of Uttarakhand

Hundreds of people gathered outside the Jolly Grant airport on

News: “Save Thano” The new Chipko movement of Uttarakhand

Hundreds of people gathered outside the Jolly Grant airport on 18, Oct, 2020 to protest against the Uttarakhand government’s decision to seek the National Wildlife Board’s approval for transfer of 243 acres of forest land to the Airport Authority of India (AAI) for the expansion of the airport.

The reason stated by the government is the strategic importance due to its proximity to Line of Actual Control (LAC) as Uttarakhand shares border with China. However, Uttarakhand already has airstrips at Gauchar and Pithoragarh, close to the LAC.

As the area of the proposed airport expansion lies within a 10km radius of the Rajaji National Park Eco- Sensitive Zone, so it is believed that this would affect the wildlife and biodiversity in the area as around 10000 trees would be cut down for the project in the Thano range. However, it has been assured by the Jollygrant airport Director, D. K. Gautam that there would be plantation at some other place.

Join Us as a Campus Ambassador for Legal Wires and Lex Live!
Join Us as a Campus Ambassador for Legal Wires and Lex Live!
Join Us as a Campus Ambassador for Legal Wires & Lex Live! Lead initiatives, build Legal AI Societies, and connect with peers and professionals. https://forms.gle/sFNBHhiquZSGemqw9
"No Suits to Be Registered and No Orders Passed Until Further Directions": Supreme Court Intervenes in Places of Worship Act Case
"No Suits to Be Registered and No Orders Passed Until Further Directions": Supreme Court Intervenes in Places of Worship Act Case
The Supreme Court halts the registration of new suits against places of worship and bars survey orders in pending cases, while hearing petitions challenging the Places of Worship Act, 1991.
"Mere Harassment Not Enough for Suicide Abetment Conviction": Supreme Court Clarifies Legal Standards
"Mere Harassment Not Enough for Suicide Abetment Conviction": Supreme Court Clarifies Legal Standards
The Supreme Court rules that harassment alone isn't enough to convict someone of abetment to suicide. It requires evidence of direct action or incitement by the accused.
Or
Powered by Lit Law
New Chat
Sources

Ask Lit Law