Automated compliance and legal drafting
Single judge bench of Justice Vibhu Bakhru of Delhi High Court ruled that promise of marriage cannot be taken as inducement for engaging in sex over a long and indefinite period.
Order was passed against the appeal to trial court dated 24th March, 2018 in which accused was acquitted of the offences under section 417 & 376 of IPC, 1860.
The bench held that both, complaint made by the appellant as well as her testimony that her relationship with the accused was consensual. Moreover, there was also inordinate delay of 640 days in filing appeal without any ground for condoning such delay.
§ Related Reading
- BuzzSupreme Court: Living Like Husband and Wife Doesn’t Constitute Rape on False Marriage Promise
- Case StudyCase Study: Dr. N.G. Dastane v. Mrs. S. Dastane
- Case StudyCase Study: S. Nagalingam v. Sivagami
- BuzzSupreme Court Quashes Rape Allegation: Differentiates Consensual Relationships from Criminal Misconduct in False Promise of Marriage Case
- Case StudyCase Study: Bhauroa Shankar Lokhande and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
