Central Government: Foreign commercial entities don’t have fundamental rights

The Central Government filed an affidavit before the Delhi High Court averring

Central Government: Foreign commercial entities don’t have fundamental rights

The Central Government filed an affidavit before the Delhi High Court averring that foreign commercial entities such as WhatsApp cannot challenge the constitutionality of Indian laws by invoking fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution.

WhatsApp and parent company Facebook challenged provisions of the new rules that require communication platforms to trace the first originator of messages because it would require the companies to break end-to-end encryption and violate user privacy agreements. In its affidavit, the government vehemently protested this allegation and argued that the traceability provisions are necessary for law enforcement authorities to track the originators of fake messages that “disturb the maintenance of public order.”

WhatsApp’s petition is based on the right to privacy which is guaranteed as part of the right to life and dignity under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. The government has argued that WhatsApp is a commercial entity and cannot claim the right to life since this right is inapplicable to ‘artificial juristic’ entities. It further challenged the authority of WhatsApp, as a platform that monetizes users’ information for commercial profit, to bring such a challenge before court.

WhatsApp also challenged the right to freedom of business i.e. protected under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India. The government has rebutted this claim as well, stating that rights under Article 19 are only available to citizens of India and WhatsApp has a place of business outside India.

The affidavit was filed as part of the government’s response to WhatsApp’s lawsuit against the new Information Technology Rules which were brought by the government in February 2021.

"Mere Harassment Not Enough for Suicide Abetment Conviction": Supreme Court Clarifies Legal Standards
"Mere Harassment Not Enough for Suicide Abetment Conviction": Supreme Court Clarifies Legal Standards
The Supreme Court rules that harassment alone isn't enough to convict someone of abetment to suicide. It requires evidence of direct action or incitement by the accused.
Israel’s Aggressive Push in Syria: Massive Air Strikes, Buffer Zones, and Golan Heights Seizure After Assad’s Fall
Israel’s Aggressive Push in Syria: Massive Air Strikes, Buffer Zones, and Golan Heights Seizure After Assad’s Fall
In the wake of Assad's collapse, Israel conducts 250 air strikes, seizes Golan Heights territory, and imposes a buffer zone, reshaping Syria's post-regime future and escalating regional tensions.
"Places of Worship Act Crucial to Maintain Communal Harmony”: CPI(M) Seeks to Intervene in Supreme Court Plea
"Places of Worship Act Crucial to Maintain Communal Harmony”: CPI(M) Seeks to Intervene in Supreme Court Plea
The CPI(M) seeks to intervene in the Supreme Court’s hearing on the Places of Worship Act, arguing it is crucial for maintaining secularism and preventing communal conflicts in India.
Powered by Lit Law
New Chat
Sources

Ask Lit Law