Calcutta High Court Denies Ban on Animal Sacrifice During Bolla Kali Puja, Emphasizes Regional Diversity

The Calcutta High Court recently made a significant observation regarding the diversity of religious practices across India while addressing a plea to curb animal sacrifices at Kolkata’s Bolla Kali Temple during the Bolla Kali Puja. The bench remarked that what may be considered essential in one part of India could differ in another, making a uniform restriction on such practices impractical.

This petition was brought forward by the Akhil Bharatiya Go Sevak Sangh, an organization advocating for a ban on animal sacrifices, which they argue are not essential to religious practices. The Calcutta High Court’s decision highlights the complexities of accommodating cultural and religious diversity while addressing public concerns over animal rights and traditional rituals.

Bench Composition & Prior Proceedings

• The matter was heard by a vacation bench comprising Justices Biswajit Basu and Ajay Kumar Gupta.
• Last year, a similar petition was presented before a bench led by Chief Justice TS Sivagananam. The plea aimed to prohibit the alleged sacrifice of nearly 10,000 goats during the festival.
• The previous bench, while denying interim relief, agreed to examine the broader issue of whether animal sacrifice could be legally restricted in West Bengal.

Petitioner’s Argument for an Immediate Ban

• The petitioners, representing the Akhil Bharatiya Go Sevak Sangh, sought urgent relief to halt the animal sacrifices scheduled for Friday.
• They argued that animal sacrifice is not an essential religious practice and should be restricted, aligning with broader concerns about animal rights.
• Emphasizing the urgency, the petitioners sought a blanket ban on the practice.

Court’s Observations on Regional Differences

• The court acknowledged that defining what constitutes an essential religious practice is complicated due to the diversity of traditions across India.
• “It is in controversy whether mythical characters were really vegetarian or non-vegetarian,” the bench remarked, hinting at the historical and cultural variations in religious beliefs.
• The bench noted that cultural practices in East India differ significantly from those in North India, making it difficult to impose uniform restrictions.
• “Imposing a blanket ban without a clear case would be impractical and unenforceable,” the court further observed.

Ruling & Further Proceedings

• The court ultimately declined interim relief, stating that a clear case for banning animal sacrifices had not been established.
• The bench added that practices rooted in the historical and cultural context of the region may not be readily amendable through judicial intervention.
• The matter has now been referred to a regular bench for a more detailed hearing on the broader issue of animal sacrifice and its validity in religious customs.