Latest articles
CCM Industrial Pte Ltd (in liquidation) v Chan Pui Yee [2016] SGHC 231
g JC Counsel Name(s) : Justin Yip Yung Keong and Aw Chee Yao (Morgan Lewis Stamford LLC) for the plaintiff; Cheong Jun Ming Mervyn and Jerrie Tan (Eugene Thuraisingam LLP) for the defendant. Parties : CCM Industrial Pte Ltd (in liquidation) — Chan Pui Yee Insolvency Law – Avoidance of transactions –
Southern Realty (Malaya) Sdn Bhd v Chen Jia Fu Darren (alias Tan Suryo) and others [2016] SGHC 230
In Southern Realty (Malaya) Sdn Bhd v Chen Jia Fu Darren (alias Tan Suryo) and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Stay of Proceedings, Conflict of Laws — Natural Forum.
Humpuss Sea Transport Pte Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) v PT Humpuss Intermoda Transportasi TBK and another [2016] SGHC 229
In Humpuss Sea Transport Pte Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) v PT Humpuss Intermoda Transportasi TBK and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil procedure — Striking out, Abuse of process.
Public Prosecutor v Sibeko Lindiwe Mary-Jane [2016] SGHC 228
In Public Prosecutor v Sibeko Lindiwe Mary-Jane, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal procedure and sentencing — Sentencing.
Public Prosecutor v Pham Duyen Quyen [2016] SGHC 227
In Public Prosecutor v Pham Duyen Quyen, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Statutory offences, Criminal procedure and sentencing — Sentencing.
Public Prosecutor v Selamat bin Paki and others [2016] SGHC 226
In Public Prosecutor v Selamat bin Paki and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Statutory offences.
Foo Jee Boo v Foo Jee Seng [2016] SGHC 225
In Foo Jee Boo v Foo Jee Seng, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Land — Sale of land, Trusts — Resulting trusts.
Rosemawati bte Rafdi v Buang bin Ani and others [2016] SGHC 223
In Rosemawati bte Rafdi v Buang bin Ani and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Amendments.
Hauslab Design & Build Pte Ltd v Vinod Kumar Ramgopal Didwania [2016] SGHC 222
In Hauslab Design & Build Pte Ltd v Vinod Kumar Ramgopal Didwania, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Building and construction law — Dispute resolution.
Public Prosecutor v BDB [2016] SGHC 221
In Public Prosecutor v BDB, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal procedure and sentencing — Mitigation, Criminal procedure and sentencing — Sentencing.
Yeo Henry (executor and trustee of the estate of Ng Lay Hua, deceased) v Yeo Charles and others [2016] SGHC 220
In Yeo Henry (executor and trustee of the estate of Ng Lay Hua, deceased) v Yeo Charles and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Succession and wills — Testamentary capacity.
Rahimah Bte Mohd Salim v Public Prosecutor [2016] SGHC 219
In Rahimah Bte Mohd Salim v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Revision of proceedings.
Kioumji & Eslim Law Firm and another v Rotary Engineering Ltd and others [2016] SGHC 218
In Kioumji & Eslim Law Firm and another v Rotary Engineering Ltd and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Conflict of Laws — Natural forum, Conflict of Laws — Choice of law.
Public Prosecutor v Ranjit Singh Gill Menjeet Singh and another [2016] SGHC 217
In Public Prosecutor v Ranjit Singh Gill Menjeet Singh and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Statutory offences.
Joseph Ramanathan v Stratech Systems Ltd [2016] SGHC 216
In Joseph Ramanathan v Stratech Systems Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Employment Law — Pay.
Chng Leng Khim v Public Prosecutor and another matter [2016] SGHC 215
The High Court set aside a conviction after finding the appellant's guilty plea was induced by undue pressure from counsel regarding a potential psychiatric remand. The case clarifies that pleas must be entered voluntarily, free from alarmist advice that deprives an accused of their freedom of choic
Calvin Klein, Inc and another v HS International Pte Ltd and others [2016] SGHC 214
In an application for summary judgment for trade mark infringement, the court must determine if there is a prima facie case of infringement and if the defendant has a real or bona fide defence. Innocent infringement is not a defence in civil trade mark infringement actions.
Public Prosecutor v Pram Nair [2016] SGHC 213
In Public Prosecutor v Pram Nair, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal procedure and sentencing — Sentencing.
JX Holdings Inc and another v Singapore Airlines Ltd [2016] SGHC 212
In JX Holdings Inc and another v Singapore Airlines Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Companies — Shares, Conflict of Laws — Choice of law.
BDG v BDH [2016] SGHC 211
In BDG v BDH, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Companies — Winding up.
Pacific Andes Resources Development Ltd and other matters [2016] SGHC 210
Analysis of [2016] SGHC 210, a decision of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore on 2016-09-27.
Sim Yeow Kee v Public Prosecutor and another appeal [2016] SGHC 209
In Sim Yeow Kee v Public Prosecutor and another appeal, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Sentencing.
One Investment and Consultancy Limited and another v Cham Poh Meng (DBS Bank Ltd, garnishee) [2016] SGHC 208
In One Investment and Consultancy Limited and another v Cham Poh Meng (DBS Bank Ltd, garnishee), the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Banking — Garnishee orders.
Lee Wei Ling and another v Attorney-General [2016] SGHC 207
The High Court dismissed the application, ruling that while the LKY estate holds the copyright to the Transcripts, its rights are limited by the Interview Agreement. The court held that the estate cannot grant access or use the materials, as those rights were personal to the late Lee Kuan Yew.