Latest articles
WHI v WHJ [2017] SGHCF 24
In WHI v WHJ, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family law — Consent orders.
UFU (M.W.) v UFV [2017] SGHCF 23
In UFU (M.W.) v UFV, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family Law -Matrimonial assets -Division, Family Law — Maintenance -Wife.
UFM v UFN [2017] SGHCF 22
In UFM v UFN, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family law — Ancillary powers of court, Statutory interpretation — Construction of statute.
TSH and another v TSE and another and another appeal and another matter [2017] SGHCF 21
In TSH and another v TSE and another and another appeal and another matter, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family law — Wrongful retention, Family law — Wardship.
TDL v TDK [2017] SGHCF 20
In TDL v TDK, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Appeals.
TPY v TPZ and another appeal [2017] SGHCF 2
In TPY v TPZ and another appeal, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family law — Matrimonial assets.
TJR v TJS [2017] SGHCF 19
In TJR v TJS, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family law — Matrimonial assets.
TBZ v TCA [2017] SGHCF 18
In TBZ v TCA, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family law — Matrimonial assets, Family law — Maintenance.
UDF v UDG [2017] SGHCF 17
In UDF v UDG, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family law — Custody.
UDA v UDB and another [2017] SGHCF 16
In UDA v UDB and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family law — Matrimonial assets, Family law — Matrimonial proceedings.
TUC v TUD [2017] SGHCF 15
In TUC v TUD, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Appeals.
UBD v UBE [2017] SGHCF 14
In UBD v UBE, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family law — Matrimonial assets, Family law — Maintenance.
UBM v UBN [2017] SGHCF 13
In UBM v UBN, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family Law — Matrimonial Assets, Family law — Maintenance of Wife.
TUC v TUD [2017] SGHCF 12
In TUC v TUD, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family Law — Child, International Law — Conventions.
UAP v UAQ [2017] SGHCF 11
In UAP v UAQ, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family law — Matrimonial assets, Family law — Maintenance.
UAM v UAN and another [2017] SGHCF 10
In UAM v UAN and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Abuse of Process — Extended doctrine of res judicata, Equity — Defences.
TVJ v TVK [2017] SGHCF 1
In TVJ v TVK, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family law — Matrimonial assets, Family law — Maintenance.
Re Gulf Pacific Shipping Ltd (in creditors' voluntary liquidation) and others [2016] SGHC 287
Analysis of [2016] SGHC 287, a decision of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore on 2016-12-30.
Ng Jun Xian v Public Prosecutor [2016] SGHC 286
In Ng Jun Xian v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Appeal.
Main-line Corporation v United Overseas Bank Ltd and another [2016] SGHC 285
The judgment in Main-line Corporation v United Overseas Bank Ltd and another [2016] SGHC 285 represents the culmination of a protracted legal battle concerning the infringement of Singapore Patent No 86037, titled “Dynamic Currency Conversion for Card Payment Systems”. Following
Public Prosecutor v Sumanthiran s/o Selvarajoo [2016] SGHC 284
In Public Prosecutor v Sumanthiran s/o Selvarajoo, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Offences.
Prima Bulkship Pte Ltd (in creditors' voluntary liquidation) and another v Lim Say Wan and another [2016] SGHC 283
In Prima Bulkship Pte Ltd (in creditors' voluntary liquidation) and another v Lim Say Wan and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Companies — Directors.
Forest Fibers Inc and another v K K Asia Environmental Pte Ltd and others [2016] SGHC 282
The court held that a personal undertaking in a contract does not necessarily create a caveatable interest in land, and an injunction cannot be granted to restrain the disposal of assets where there is no proprietary interest or clear negative covenant concerning the land.
Supercars Lorinser Pte Ltd and another v Benzline Auto Pte Ltd [2016] SGHC 281
In Supercars Lorinser Pte Ltd and another v Benzline Auto Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — formation, Restitution — change of position.