Latest articles
UJH v UJI [2018] SGHCF 4
In UJH v UJI, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family Law -Matrimonial assets -Division, Family Law -Matrimonial assets -Maintenance.
UDS v UDR [2018] SGHCF 3
In UDS v UDR, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family Law — Matrimonial assets, Family Law — Maintenance.
URU v URV [2018] SGHCF 22
In URU v URV [2018] SGHCF 22, the court ruled that leave of court is not required to endorse a penal notice on a court order under r 696(4) of the Family Justice Rules, simplifying enforcement procedures while maintaining judicial oversight at the committal stage.
TWD and another v UQE [2018] SGHCF 21
In TWD and another v UQE, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family Law – Procedure.
UMF v UMG and another [2018] SGHCF 20
In UMF v UMG and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family Law – Guardianship, Family Law – Wardship.
WHM v WHN [2018] SGHCF 2
In WHM v WHN, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family Law — Matrimonial assets, Family Law — Maintenance.
ULA v UKZ [2018] SGHCF 19
In ULA v UKZ, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family Law — Custody.
UKM v Attorney-General [2018] SGHCF 18
In UKM v Attorney-General, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family Law — Adoption, Statutory Interpretation — Construction of statute.
TQT v TQU [2018] SGHCF 17
In TQT v TQU, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family Law — Matrimonial assets.
UMU v UMT and another appeal [2018] SGHCF 16
In UMU v UMT and another appeal, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family Law — Matrimonial assets, Family Law — Maintenance.
UNE v UNF [2018] SGHCF 15
In UNE v UNF, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Judgments and orders, Contempt of Court — Civil contempt.
UMM v UML [2018] SGHCF 13
In UMM v UML, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family Law — Consent orders.
UNE v UNF [2018] SGHCF 12
In UNE v UNF, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family Law — Matrimonial assets, Family Law — Ancillary powers of court.
TAU v TAT [2018] SGHCF 11
In TAU v TAT, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family Law — Custody.
UNB v Child Protector [2018] SGHCF 10
In UNB v Child Protector, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family law — Care and protection orders, Family law — Family Justice Courts.
UJF v UJG [2018] SGHCF 1
In UJF v UJG, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family law -Matrimonial assets -Division — Application of structured approach in ANJ v ANK, Family law — Maintenance.
Public Prosecutor v Ng Peng Chong and another [2017] SGHC 99
In Public Prosecutor v Ng Peng Chong [2017] SGHC 99, the High Court convicted two accused of drug trafficking, rejecting their consumption defence due to inconsistent evidence. The court clarified that addiction does not override the presumption of trafficking when evidence of commercial intent exis
Otto Ventures Pte Ltd v ECYT Law LLC [2017] SGHC 98
In Otto Ventures Pte Ltd v ECYT Law LLC, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Legal profession - Solicitor's undertaking — Construction of undertaking, Arbitration — Security for costs.
Fu Loong Lithographer Pte Ltd and others v Mok Wing Chong (Tan Keng Lin and others, third parties) [2017] SGHC 97
In Fu Loong Lithographer Pte Ltd and others v Mok Wing Chong (Tan Keng Lin and others, third parties), the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Land — Strata Titles.
Ho Heng Leng (alias Foo Chee Kai) v Lodge, Kenneth George (litigation representative and administrator of the estate of Lodge, Vivien (alias Vivien Tsuji), deceased) (Lim Soon Wah Thomas, third party) [2017] SGHC 96
The court held that the plaintiff had proven on a balance of probabilities that the funds advanced to the deceased were a loan rather than a gift, and thus the estate was liable for repayment.
Ong Teck Soon (executor of the estate of Ong Kim Nang, deceased) v Ong Teck Seng and another [2017] SGHC 95
The legal burden of proof lies on the defendant to prove that the disposal of assets was authorised by the Testator when the defendant admits to dealing with the assets but pleads authorisation as a defence.
Public Prosecutor v Kusrini Bt Caslan Arja [2017] SGHC 94
In Public Prosecutor v Kusrini Bt Caslan Arja, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Sentencing.
Tradewaves Ltd and others v Standard Chartered Bank and another suit [2017] SGHC 93
In Tradewaves Ltd and others v Standard Chartered Bank and another suit, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Duty of Care, Contract — Misrepresentation.
Benber Dayao Yu v Jacter Singh [2017] SGHC 92
The court held that the Protection from Harassment Act (POHA) applies to online conduct and that the 'reasonable conduct' defence requires more than just having a personal viewpoint; it must be objectively reasonable in the circumstances.