Latest articles
Financial Advisers (Appeals) Regulations 2025
Overview of the Financial Advisers (Appeals) Regulations 2025, Singapore sl.
O'Connor Rosamund Monica v Potter Derek John [2009] SGHC 258
In O'Connor Rosamund Monica v Potter Derek John, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Family Law.
Financial Advisers (Structured Deposits — Prescribed Investment Product and Exemption) Regulations
Overview of the Financial Advisers (Structured Deposits — Prescribed Investment Product and Exemption) Regulations, Singapore sl.
YCH DISTRIPARK PTE. LTD. v THE COLLECTOR OF LAND REVENUE
In YCH DISTRIPARK PTE. LTD. v THE COLLECTOR OF LAND REVENUE, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Financial Advisers (Exemption from Sections 25 to 29 and 36) Regulations
Overview of the Financial Advisers (Exemption from Sections 25 to 29 and 36) Regulations, Singapore sl.
SEF Construction Pte Ltd v Skoy Connected Pte Ltd [2009] SGHC 257
In SEF Construction Pte Ltd v Skoy Connected Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Building and Construction Law.
Yamashita Tetsuo v See Hup Seng Ltd
The Court of Appeal overturned the lower court's ruling in Yamashita Tetsuo v See Hup Seng Ltd, mandating the full cash repayment of the outstanding principal sum. The Court rejected the respondent's attempt to extinguish part of the debt, emphasizing commercial reasonableness in contract interpreta
Financial Advisers (Insurance Broking Premium Accounts) (Transitional and Savings Provisions) Regulations
Overview of the Financial Advisers (Insurance Broking Premium Accounts) (Transitional and Savings Provisions) Regulations, Singapore sl.
Precise Development Pte Ltd v Holcim (Singapore) Pte Ltd [2009] SGHC 256
In Precise Development Pte Ltd v Holcim (Singapore) Pte Ltd, the High Court ruled that an ambiguous termination notice failed to trigger contractual rights. The defendant was held in breach of contract for failing to supply concrete, resulting in an interlocutory judgment for the plaintiff.
Westacre Investments Inc v The State-Owned Company Yugoimport SDPR (also known as Jugoimport-SDPR)
In Westacre Investments Inc v The State-Owned Company Yugoimport SDPR (also known as Jugoimport-SDPR), the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Financial Advisers Regulations
Overview of the Financial Advisers Regulations, Singapore sl.
Rangasamy Subramaniam v Public Prosecutor [2009] SGHC 255
In Rangasamy Subramaniam v PP [2009] SGHC 255, the High Court set aside a conviction for drink-driving, ruling that the statutory presumption under s 71A(1) of the Road Traffic Act does not apply when an accused is merely 'in charge' of a vehicle rather than actively driving it.
Financial Advisers (Transitional and Savings Provisions) Regulations
Overview of the Financial Advisers (Transitional and Savings Provisions) Regulations, Singapore sl.
Tsu Soo Sin v Oei Tjiong Bin and Another
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal in Tsu Soo Sin v Oei Tjiong Bin, ruling that a ledger account named as 'A/B' creates a joint tenancy in equity with a right of survivorship, absent evidence to the contrary. The appellant was entitled to the funds as a joint assignee.
Films (Exemption) (No. 2) Notification 2011
Overview of the Films (Exemption) (No. 2) Notification 2011, Singapore sl.
Premium Automobiles Pte Ltd v Song Gin Puay Ronnie [2009] SGHC 254
In Premium Automobiles Pte Ltd v Song Gin Puay Ronnie, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Employment Law — Performance bonus entitlement, Employment Law — Variation of employment contract terms by agreement or by estoppel.
SVM INTERNATIONAL TRADING PTE. LTD. & 3 Ors v LIEW KUM CHONG
In SVM INTERNATIONAL TRADING PTE. LTD. & 3 Ors v LIEW KUM CHONG, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Films (Exemption) Notification 2011
Overview of the Films (Exemption) Notification 2011, Singapore sl.
Satinder Singh Garcha v Uthayasurian Sidambaram and Another [2009] SGHC 253
In Satinder Singh Garcha v Uthayasurian Sidambaram and Another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure.
Films (Presidential Election Campaign Recordings — Exemption) Notification 2011
Overview of the Films (Presidential Election Campaign Recordings — Exemption) Notification 2011, Singapore sl.
Murakami Takako (executrix of the estate of Takashi Murakami Suroso, deceased) v Wiryadi Louise Maria and Others
The Singapore Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal in Murakami Takako v Wiryadi Louise Maria, affirming that Singapore was not the appropriate forum. The court upheld the refusal to include disputed claims, reinforcing the Spiliada forum non conveniens test for cross-border asset disputes.
Wang Sam Lin v Burridge Steven Harold (trading as Steven Burridge Racing Stables) [2009] SGHC 252
In Wang Sam Lin v Burridge Steven Harold (trading as Steven Burridge Racing Stables), the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Tort.
BIDZINA IVANISHVILI & 4 Ors v CREDIT SUISSE TRUST LIMITED
The Singapore Court of Appeal ruled that litigation against Credit Suisse Trust Limited may proceed in Singapore, rejecting a stay of proceedings. The majority decision clarifies the forum non conveniens doctrine, emphasizing the high burden required to displace a plaintiff's choice of forum.
Films (Exemption) Notification 2005
Overview of the Films (Exemption) Notification 2005, Singapore sl.