Latest articles
WILLIAM DANIEL MILLIGAN v AL MOJIL INVESTMENT [2016] DIFC CFI 037 — Consent order and trial vacation (12 December 2016)
The litigation initiated by William Daniel Milligan against Al Mojil Investment Limited under case number CFI 037/2015 concerned a commercial claim brought before the DIFC Court of First Instance.
WILLIAM DANIEL MILLIGAN v AL MOJIL INVESTMENT [2016] DIFC CFI 037 — Procedural variation of trial timelines (24 October 2016)
The litigation involves a claim brought by William Daniel Milligan against Al Mojil Investment Limited. While the underlying substantive merits of the claim remain outside the scope of this specific procedural order, the case reached a critical juncture in late 2016 where the parties sought to…
WILLIAM DANIEL MILLIGAN v AL MOJIL INVESTMENT [2016] DIFC CFI 037 — procedural amendment and the avoidance of mini-trials (03 October 2016)
The dispute centers on the Claimant’s attempt to recover outstanding salary, notice pay, and end-of-service gratuity following the termination of his employment. Initially, the Claimant pursued these claims against a different entity, MMG, but subsequently discontinued that action and sought to…
WILLIAM DANIEL MILLIGAN v AL MOJIL INVESTMENT [2016] DIFC CFI 037 — Consent order for counterclaim discontinuance (29 August 2016)
The litigation under case number CFI 037/2015 involved a primary claim brought by William Daniel Milligan against Al Mojil Investment Limited. While the specific underlying commercial merits of the main claim remain outside the scope of this procedural order, the case reached a critical juncture…
WILLIAM DANIEL MILLIGAN v AL MOJIL INVESTMENT [2016] DIFC CFI 037 — Case Management Order (03 August 2016)
The litigation concerns a conflict between the Claimant, William Daniel Milligan, and the Defendant, Al Mojil Investment Limited. The current procedural posture is defined by two opposing applications that threaten the viability of the claim.
WILLIAM DANIEL MILLIGAN v AL MOJIL INVESTMENT [2016] DIFC CFI 037 — Consent order for discontinuance (20 July 2016)
The litigation, registered under CFI 037/2015, involved William Daniel Milligan as the Claimant and two entities, Al Mojil Investment Limited and Mohammed Al-Mojil Group, as the First and Second Defendants, respectively.
WILLIAM DANIEL MILLIGAN v AL MOJIL INVESTMENT [2016] DIFC CFI 037 — Consent order for stay of proceedings (06 April 2016)
The litigation involves William Daniel Milligan as the Claimant against Al Mojil Investment Limited (First Defendant) and Mohammed Al-Mojil Group (Second Defendant). While the underlying substantive claims are not detailed in the consent order, the procedural history indicates a significant…
WILLIAM DANIEL MILLIGAN v AL MOJIL INVESTMENT [2016] DIFC CFI 037 — Consent order for mediation stay (22 March 2016)
The litigation under case number CFI 037/2015 involves a claim brought by William Daniel Milligan against two corporate entities: Al Mojil Investment Limited (the First Defendant) and Mohammed Al-Mojil Group (the Second Defendant).
NOVUS ABU DHABI GENERAL TRADING v BASE [2014] DIFC CFI 037 — Default judgment for commercial debt recovery (08 December 2014)
The lawsuit concerns a commercial debt recovery action brought by Novus Abu Dhabi General Trading LLC against Base LLC. The Claimant sought to recover a specified sum of money, totaling USD $2,834,675.75, which remained unpaid by the Defendant.
GRAFT GESELLSCHAFT VON ARCHITEKTEN v ZABEEL INVESTMENTS [2013] DIFC CFI 037 — Transfer to Special Judicial Committee (07 January 2013)
The litigation involved a claim brought by Graft Gesellschaft Von Architekten MBH against Zabeel Investments L.L.C. The dispute centered on the Claimant’s attempt to pursue legal action against the Defendant within the DIFC Court system.
STEPHAN KARL MORGENSTERN v SAIF SULTAN AL MEHRZI LAWYERS & LEGAL CONSULTANCY [2025] DIFC CFI 036 — Setting aside default judgment due to service irregularities (23 July 2025)
The litigation originated from a claim filed by Stephan Karl Morgenstern, a German national, against the Sharjah-based legal consultancy firm, Saif Sultan Al Mehrzi Lawyers & Legal Consultancy. The dispute centers on a significant financial claim brought before the DIFC Court of First Instance.
ZOOMLION GULF v BEAVER GULF CONTRACTING [2023] DIFC CFI 036 — Default judgment for breach of contract (09 November 2023)
The lawsuit centers on a commercial dispute arising from a Sale and Purchase Contract executed between the Claimant, Zoomlion Gulf FZE, and the Defendant, Beaver Gulf Contracting L.L.C.
CREDIT EUROPE BANK v NEW MEDICAL CENTRE TRADING [2021] DIFC CFI 036 — Consent judgment regarding personal guarantee liability (13 July 2021)
The litigation involved a claim by Credit Europe Bank (Dubai) Ltd against several entities, including New Medical Centre Trading LLC, NMC Healthcare LLC, and Bavaguthu Raghuram Shetty. The core of the dispute centered on the enforcement of a personal guarantee provided by Mr.
CREDIT EUROPE BANK v NEW MEDICAL CENTRE TRADING [2021] DIFC CFI 036 — Consent order regarding procedural timeline (21 April 2021)
The litigation in CFI 036/2020 involves a high-stakes banking dispute initiated by Credit Europe Bank (Dubai) Ltd against New Medical Centre Trading LLC, NMC Healthcare LLC, and Bavaguthu Raghuram Shetty.
CREDIT EUROPE BANK v NEW MEDICAL CENTRE TRADING [2021] DIFC CFI 036 — Consent order regarding document production deadlines (22 March 2021)
The litigation involves a complex financial dispute between Credit Europe Bank (Dubai) Limited and the NMC entities, including Bavaguthu Raghuram Shetty. The procedural history of this case has been marked by rigorous document production requirements, governed by previous judicial orders.
CREDIT EUROPE BANK v NEW MEDICAL CENTRE TRADING [2021] DIFC CFI 036 — Consent order for document production deadlines (21 March 2021)
The litigation in CFI 036/2020 concerns a high-stakes banking and finance dispute involving Credit Europe Bank (Dubai) Ltd as the Claimant, and a group of defendants including New Medical Centre Trading LLC, NMC Healthcare LLC, and Bavaguthu Raghuram Shetty.
CREDIT EUROPE BANK v NEW MEDICAL CENTRE TRADING [2021] DIFC CFI 036 — Compelling document disclosure from the Third Defendant (01 March 2021)
The litigation involves a high-stakes banking and finance dispute where Credit Europe Bank (Dubai) Ltd seeks to recover outstanding liabilities from New Medical Centre Trading LLC, NMC Healthcare LLC, and the Third Defendant, Bavaguthu Raghuram Shetty.
CREDIT EUROPE BANK v NEW MEDICAL CENTRE TRADING [2021] DIFC CFI 036 — Compelling document production via Redfern schedule (23 February 2021)
The litigation involves a complex banking and finance dispute where Credit Europe Bank (Dubai) Ltd seeks recovery against New Medical Centre Trading LLC, NMC Healthcare LLC, and Bavaguthu Raghuram Shetty. The immediate controversy centered on the Third Defendant’s, Mr.
CREDIT EUROPE BANK v NEW MEDICAL CENTRE TRADING [2020] DIFC CFI 036 — Interim stay pending ADGM administration recognition (03 November 2020)
The lawsuit involves a claim initiated by Credit Europe Bank (Dubai) Ltd against three defendants: New Medical Centre Trading LLC, NMC Healthcare LLC, and Bavaguthu Raghuram Shetty. The dispute concerns financial obligations owed to the Claimant, which led to the filing of a Claim Form and…
CREDIT EUROPE BANK v NEW MEDICAL CENTRE TRADING [2020] DIFC CFI 036 — Procedural adjournment of immediate judgment and stay applications (24 September 2020)
Credit Europe Bank (Dubai) Ltd commenced this action on 19 April 2020, seeking legal recourse against the NMC entities and Bavaguthu Raghuram Shetty. The dispute centers on financial obligations and the recovery of debt, which escalated into a formal claim in the DIFC Court of First Instance.
CREDIT EUROPE BANK v NEW MEDICAL CENTRE TRADING [2020] DIFC CFI 036 — Procedural consent order regarding immediate judgment application (02 September 2020)
The litigation arises from a claim filed by Credit Europe Bank (Dubai) Ltd on 19 April 2020 against three defendants: New Medical Centre Trading LLC, NMC Healthcare LLC, and Bavaguthu Raghuram Shetty.
CREDIT EUROPE BANK v NEW MEDICAL CENTRE TRADING [2020] DIFC CFI 036 — Procedural stay pending immediate judgment application (03 August 2020)
This consent order formalizes the suspension of standard case management timelines in the high-profile litigation between Credit Europe Bank and the NMC entities, prioritizing the determination of the Claimant’s application for immediate judgment.
CREDIT EUROPE BANK v NEW MEDICAL CENTRE TRADING [2020] DIFC CFI 036 — Dismissal of confidentiality application (08 July 2020)
The DIFC Court of First Instance reaffirms the primacy of open justice, rejecting an attempt by NMC entities to shield litigation from public scrutiny.
CREDIT EUROPE BANK v NEW MEDICAL CENTRE TRADING [2020] DIFC CFI 036 — Procedural management of complex banking litigation (02 June 2020)
The litigation concerns a claim initiated by Credit Europe Bank (Dubai) Ltd against New Medical Centre Trading LLC, NMC Healthcare LLC, and Bavaguthu Raghuram Shetty. The dispute arises within the context of the broader financial restructuring and legal challenges faced by the NMC group during…