Latest articles
Public Prosecutor v Lim Beng Cheok [2003] SGHC 54
In Public Prosecutor v Lim Beng Cheok [2003] SGHC 54, the High Court sentenced the accused to 18 years' imprisonment for multiple sexual offences. The court emphasized that systematic abuse of trust against vulnerable students necessitates substantial custodial sentences over mitigating factors.
Lam Hong Leong Aluminium Pte Ltd v Lian Teck Huat Construction Pte Ltd and Another [2003] SGHC 53
The High Court ruled in favor of Lam Hong Leong Aluminium, awarding $27,594 for work on the Genting block and granting interlocutory judgment for the Tannery block. The court dismissed the defendants' counterclaims and held the second defendant personally liable under the guarantee.
Rahman Pachan Pillai Prasana v Public Prosecutor [2003] SGHC 52
The fact that an offender made no financial gain or caused no financial loss to another from the crime of fabricating false evidence is a legitimate mitigating factor but of very little weight, as the true victim is the course of justice itself.
Hong Cheng Air-Conditioning Engineering Pte Ltd v Wee Siong Engineering Services Pte Ltd [2003] SGHC 51
In Hong Cheng Air-Conditioning v Wee Siong Engineering [2003] SGHC 51, the court ruled for the plaintiff, holding that an oral variation agreement constituted a separate contract, rendering the doctrine of substantial performance inapplicable to the original lump sum agreement.
Sincere Watch Limited v Bakery Mart Pte Ltd [2003] SGHC 50
The court held that where restructuring discussions stopped short of agreed terms and an executed agreement, the defendant should not have unconditional leave to defend a summary judgment application.
Tay Chi Hiong v Public Prosecutor [2003] SGHC 5
An appellate court will not overturn findings of fact unless they are against the weight of evidence, and minor inconsistencies in witness testimony do not necessarily undermine the evidence on key issues.
Public Prosecutor v Mohamed Ridwan Bin Omar and Others [2003] SGHC 49
The court sentenced five accused persons for voluntary causing grievous hurt by means of a dangerous weapon under s 326 read with s 149 of the Penal Code, following a fatal attack.
Yuong Cheong Construction Pte Ltd v Shimizu Corporation [2003] SGHC 48
The occupier's liability under the Factories Act is strict, but the Act allows the occupier to shift liability to a third party if the third party is proven to be the actual offender. The criminal liability of the third party does not depend on the occupier's ability to prove due
Chuah Gin Synn v Public Prosecutor [2003] SGHC 47
The High Court in its appellate jurisdiction has the power to correct non-clerical mistakes in its judgment before the court rises for the day, applying the same powers as subordinate courts under s 217 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Public Prosecutor v Tay Teik Chai Robson [2003] SGHC 46
The court held that while the accused did not wield the weapon, his participation in a long and brutal assault warranted a sentence of nine years imprisonment and 12 strokes of the cane.
Public Prosecutor v Jaykumaran s/o Saminathan Retinam [2003] SGHC 45
The High Court quashed the conviction of the accused in a criminal revision because the prosecution failed to call a material witness, and the victim's evidence was unreliable.
Public Prosecutor v Tan Chun Seng [2003] SGHC 44
The court held that the defence of grave and sudden provocation under Exception 1 to s 300 of the Penal Code was not made out as the provocation did not emanate from the deceased in a manner that could be considered grave and sudden.
Re Lion City Holdings Pte Ltd [2003] SGHC 43
In Re Lion City Holdings Pte Ltd [2003] SGHC 43, the High Court dismissed an application to set aside an examination order under section 285 of the Companies Act, ruling that non-disclosure of a protective writ did not invalidate the order as it was not intended to mislead the court.
Bayerische Landesbank Girozentrale v Khaw Hock Seang [2003] SGHC 42
The burden of proving a forgery lies on the person asserting it and the burden of proving a forgery is more onerous than the ordinary standard required in civil cases.
Publicis Group SA v Chong Hon Kuan Ivan [2003] SGHC 41
An originating summons is not an appropriate process where there is a dispute regarding essential facts which cannot be resolved on the basis of affidavits; in such cases, the court may order the proceedings to continue as if they had been begun by writ.
Eltraco International Pte Ltd v Sennet Electrical Engineering Pte Ltd and Others [2003] SGHC 40
A court-sanctioned scheme of arrangement under s 210 of the Companies Act is binding on all creditors and cannot be circumvented by creditors seeking direct payments from third parties if such payments would undermine the scheme's distribution mechanism.
Reemtsma Cigarettenfabriken GmbH v Hugo Boss AG [2003] SGHC 4
The court held that a certificate of service issued by judicial authorities is prima facie evidence of the facts stated therein, and the burden of proof lies on the party challenging service to prove non-service on a balance of probabilities.
Lwee Kwi Ling Mary v Public Prosecutor [2003] SGHC 39
The court does not have the power to suspend the execution of a sentence once the offender has commenced serving it, as the power to suspend execution is exclusively vested in the President under s 8(1) of the Republic of Singapore Independence Act.
Lwee Kwi Ling Mary v Quek Chin Huat [2003] SGHC 38
A death threat made with a weapon should never be taken lightly and should normally attract a prison term of at least six months, though mitigating factors such as acting in private defence may warrant a lower sentence.
Public Prosecutor v Jin Yugang [2003] SGHC 37
The court convicted Jin Yugang of murder, finding he possessed the necessary intent. His claims of intoxication and grave and sudden provocation were rejected based on the evidence of his actions. This case clarifies the high threshold for these specific legal defences.
Tan Yeow Khoon and Another v Tan Yeow Tat and Others [2003] SGHC 36
The court held that the plaintiffs were estopped from re-litigating the issue of the valuation of the property as the matter was res judicata, having been the subject of previous litigation and a consent order.
Velstra Pte Ltd v Mercator & Noordstar NV [2003] SGHC 35
A payment made by an insolvent company to a third party without consideration or for significantly less value constitutes a transaction at an undervalue under the Bankruptcy Act, and the court has no discretion to deny the liquidator's application for recovery once the statutory
Tan Whei Tet Valerie v James Johnbritto [2003] SGHC 34
In Tan Whei Tet Valerie v James Johnbritto, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Appeals.
Public Prosecutor v Louis Pius Gilbert [2003] SGHC 33
In Public Prosecutor v Louis Pius Gilbert, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Application by Public Prosecutor under s 60 of the Supreme Court Judicature Act (Cap 322) asking for question of law of public interest to be referred to the Court of Appeal.