Latest articles
OZAN KALEMDAROGLU v GMG (DUBAI) LTD [2015] DIFC CFI 018 — Pre-action disclosure of financial data in employment disputes (06 October 2015)
The DIFC Court of First Instance clarifies the threshold for pre-action disclosure, affirming that former employees may compel the production of sensitive financial records to quantify commission claims.
OZAN KALEMDAROGLU v GMG [2015] DIFC CFI 018 — Procedural consent order for document production (03 August 2015)
The litigation in CFI 018/2015 centers on a Part 8 claim initiated by the Claimant, Ozan Kalemdaroglu, against the Defendant, GMG (Dubai) Ltd. Unlike a standard Part 7 claim, which typically involves disputed facts requiring a full trial, this action was specifically framed as a request for the…
KISHANCHAND GANGARAM BHATIA v ICICI BANK [2015] DIFC CFI 018 — Final order of discontinuance (23 April 2015)
The litigation initiated by Kishanchand Gangaram Bhatia against ICICI Bank Limited centered on allegations of investment misrepresentation. The Claimant sought legal recourse within the DIFC Courts, asserting that the Defendant had failed in its duties regarding the management and disclosure of…
KISHANCHAND GANGARAM BHATIA v ICICI BANK [2015] DIFC CFI 018 — Costs allocation for unsuccessful amendment applications (31 March 2015)
The litigation involved a dispute between Kishanchand Gangaram Bhatia and ICICI Bank Limited, centered on the Claimant’s attempt to amend his particulars of claim. Following the Court’s December 2014 ruling, which granted the Claimant permission to amend his pleadings—albeit with certain…
KISHANCHAND GANGARAM BHATIA v ICICI BANK [2015] DIFC CFI 018 — Procedural joinder and the preservation of limitation defenses (12 February 2015)
The litigation, initiated by Mr. Kishanchand Gangaram Bhatia against ICICI Bank, centers on a banking dispute within the DIFC. While the underlying merits of the claim remain to be fully ventilated, the procedural posture of the case shifted significantly in early 2015 when the original claimant…
KISHANCHAND GANGARAM BHATIA v ICICI BANK [2014] DIFC CFI 018 — Judicial discretion on amending pleadings post-disclosure (17 December 2014)
The Court of First Instance clarifies the threshold for amending pleadings following document disclosure, while strictly limiting the application of the Implied Terms in Contracts and Unfair Terms Law.
ICICI Bank Limited v Mr Kishanchand Gangaram Bhatia [2014] DIFC CFI 018 — Jurisdiction and limitation in investment misrepresentation claims (30 October 2014)
The DIFC Court of First Instance clarifies that statutory limitation periods act as procedural defenses rather than jurisdictional bars, while affirming that non-exclusive jurisdiction clauses do not automatically oust the Court’s authority.
INTERNATIONAL GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY v OMAN INSURANCE COMPANY [2013] DIFC CFI 018 — Discontinuance by consent (20 November 2013)
The litigation involved a complex multi-party structure, with five distinct entities under the International General Insurance (IGI) banner—including the UK limited entity, the Labuan branch, the holding company, and the Dubai-based subsidiary—acting as Claimants against the Respondent, Oman…
DIWAN CAPITAL LIMITED v DIWAN CAPITAL AG [2014] DIFC CFI 018 — Liquidator ratification of unauthorized procedural acts (27 May 2014)
The litigation centers on the procedural legitimacy of an appeal initiated by the former CEO of Diwan Capital Limited against a judgment previously rendered by the Small Claims Tribunal. Following an extraordinary general meeting, the company had entered into members' voluntary liquidation.
DIWAN CAPITAL AG v DIWAN CAPITAL [2010] DIFC CFI 018 — Pre-incorporation contract liability and Small Claims Tribunal abuse (16 May 2011)
This judgment clarifies the strict requirements for binding a company to pre-incorporation contracts under DIFC law and warns against the abuse of the Small Claims Tribunal for test cases.
DIWAN CAPITAL v DIWAN CAPITAL AG [2011] DIFC CFI 018 — Procedural validation of appeal (22 March 2011)
The central dispute in this matter concerned the procedural legitimacy of an appeal filed by Diwan Capital Limited against a decision previously rendered in the Small Claims Tribunal (SCT 041/2010).
DIWAN CAPITAL v DIWAN CAPITAL AG [2010] DIFC CFI 018 — liquidator ratification of unauthorized procedural acts (23 February 2011)
The dispute centered on the validity of an appeal filed by Richard Bushman, the former CEO of Diwan Capital Limited ("Limited"), against a Small Claims Tribunal (SCT) judgment for AED 91,800.
DIWAN CAPITAL v DIWAN CAPITAL AG [2010] DIFC CFI 018 — Procedural stay pending capacity determination (05 October 2010)
The litigation concerns a dispute between Diwan Capital Limited (in liquidation) and Diwan Capital AG, which reached the Court of First Instance in its capacity as an appellate body reviewing a decision from the Small Claims Tribunal.
MOHAMMAD KHALID YOUSAF v YUSR ISLAMIC INVESTMENT BANK [2010] DIFC CFI 018 — Procedural directions for employment dispute disclosure (13 January 2010)
The dispute centers on an employment relationship between Mohammad Khalid Yousaf and Yusr Islamic Investment Bank. To facilitate the progression of the claim, the Registrar issued a targeted disclosure order requiring the Defendant to produce internal records that were deemed essential for the…
MOHAMMAD KHALID YOUSAF v YUSR ISLAMIC INVESTMENT BANK [2009] DIFC CFI 018 — Procedural directions for witness evidence and reconciliation (06 December 2009)
The Registrar’s order in CFI 018/2009 serves as a rigid case management roadmap, ensuring that both the Claimant, Mohammad Khalid Yousaf, and the Defendant, Yusr Islamic Investment Bank, adhere to a structured timeline for the production of evidence.
MOHAMMAD KHALID YOUSAF v YUSR ISLAMIC INVESTMENT BANK [2009] DIFC CFI 018 — Procedural rectification of pleadings (25 November 2009)
The dispute centered on the Defendant’s attempt to introduce additional matters of fact into the proceedings via an amended defence. The Claimant, Mohammad Khalid Yousaf, resisted this move, characterizing it as a tactical maneuver rather than a necessary clarification.
MUQQI v MUWAN [2023] DIFC CFI 017 — Security for costs in interlocutory injunction proceedings (23 May 2023)
The lawsuit concerns an application for security for costs filed by the first to eighth defendants against the claimant, Muqqi, in the context of an upcoming injunction hearing. The defendants sought to ensure that any potential adverse costs order could be satisfied, arguing that the claimant was…
ZENIQ TECHNOLOGIES v RAMZIQ TECHNOLOGIES [2023] DIFC CFI 017 — Withdrawal of legal representation (27 April 2023)
Judicial Officer Maitha Alshehhi grants an application for legal counsel to cease acting for the Claimant, Zeniq Technologies Limited, in complex multi-party proceedings.
ZENIQ TECHNOLOGIES v RAMZIQ TECHNOLOGIES [2023] DIFC CFI 017 — Court rejects urgency in injunction application (09 March 2023)
The dispute centers on an urgent injunction application filed by Zeniq Technologies Limited against Ramziq Technologies Limited and eight individual defendants. Zeniq sought an expedited hearing to address alleged breaches of statutory, contractual, fiduciary, and equitable duties.
KAVEH SAMIE v KKR MENA [2021] DIFC CFI 017 — Procedural termination via Notice of Discontinuance (15 April 2021)
The litigation initiated by Kaveh Samie against KKR (MENA) Limited, registered under case number CFI 017/2020, represented a high-stakes commercial dispute within the DIFC jurisdiction.
RABIH SULTANI v DUET MENA [2013] DIFC CFI 017 — Order to discontinue the claim (21 August 2013)
A procedural resolution of a general litigation dispute in the DIFC Court of First Instance following a consensual settlement between the parties.
SHIHAB KHALIL v SHUAA CAPITAL [2010] DIFC CFI 017 — Stay of proceedings pending settlement implementation (24 March 2010)
The litigation initiated by Shihab Khalil against Shuaa Capital PSC under case number CFI 017/2009 represented a high-stakes commercial dispute within the DIFC jurisdiction. While the specific underlying causes of action were not detailed in the final order, the procedural history of this matter…
SHIHAB KHALIL v SHUAA CAPITAL [2010] DIFC CFI 017 — Refusal of permission to appeal regarding shareholder standing (02 March 2010)
The Chief Justice affirms that individual shareholders lack standing to pursue personal claims for corporate mismanagement, reinforcing the primacy of the corporate veil in DIFC commercial litigation.
SHIHAB KHALIL v SHUAA CAPITAL [2009] DIFC CFI 017 — Procedural deadline for appellate filings (14 December 2009)
The litigation between Shihab Khalil and Shuaa Capital psc involved complex procedural maneuvering within the DIFC Court of First Instance. Following earlier developments in the case, including the [SHIHAB KHALIL v SHUAA CAPITAL [2009] DIFC CFI 017 — Consent order restricting document disclosure…