§

Latest articles

Columns 7 min read

Intellectual Property as a Caste Atrocity: A Legal Breakthrough in Social Justice

The Supreme Court upheld the Bombay High Court’s ruling that intellectual property loss qualifies for compensation under the SC/ST Act. This landmark decision expands the definition of property, ensuring greater protection for marginalized scholars facing caste-based discrimination.

Anish Sinha
Contributor
Jan 31
In Re case-study

Case Study: Ramesh Baghel v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others

In Ramesh Baghel v. State of Chhattisgarh, the Supreme Court upheld burial rights as integral to dignity under Article 21, balancing equality and secularism with public order. The split verdict addressed constitutional principles versus adherence to statutory rules.
2025 · 15 min read Held
Judgment
Def. lex-o-pedia
What is the interface between the Commercial Courts Act and Arbitration?
The article explores the interplay between the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, and the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, focusing on Section 13 and Section 37, judicial interpretations, and the need for clarity to ensure minimal interference and efficient dispute resolution.
Read full entry →
Columns 13 min read

Right to Burial in village graveyard, Supreme Court upholds Right to Dignity for Tribal Christian Pastor

The Supreme Court upheld the right to dignity in death, ruling that burial rights cannot be denied based on religion or conversion. It emphasized secularism, equality, and Article 21, reaffirming that dignity extends beyond life and discrimination is unconstitutional.

Anish Sinha
Contributor
Jan 27
In Re case-study

Case Study: Parsvnath Developers Limited v. Brig. Devendra Singh Yadav and others

In Parsvnath Developers v. Brig. Devendra Singh Yadav, the Punjab & Haryana High Court held that the "seat" of arbitration determines court jurisdiction, not the "venue," and an Order VII Rule 10 CPC order is non-appealable under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act.
2025 · 9 min read Held
Judgment
In Re case-study

Case Study: Central Bank of India & Anr. V. Smt. Prabha Jain & Ors.

The Supreme Court in Central Bank of India & Anr. v. Smt. Prabha Jain & Ors. held that disputes concerning title and validity of transactions fall under civil court jurisdiction, as such matters are beyond the scope of the SARFAESI Act. Partial rejection of plaints is impermissible.
2025 · 11 min read Held
Judgment
In Re case-study

Case Study: Neena Aneja and others v. Jai Prakash Associates Ltd.

The Supreme Court in Neena Aneja v. Jai Prakash Associates Ltd. held that complaints filed under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 before 20th July 2020 must remain in the same forum despite revised pecuniary limits under CPA 2019, ensuring continuity and fairness.
2025 · 10 min read Held
Judgment
In Re case-study

Case Study: Dalip Kumar @ Dalli v. State of Uttarakhand

In Dalip Kumar @ Dalli v. State of Uttarakhand, the Supreme Court acquitted the appellant, overturning convictions under Sections 363 and 366-A IPC. Key issues included a delayed FIR, lack of coercion, and insufficient evidence, leading to doubts about the prosecution's claims.
2025 · 9 min read Held
Judgment
Def. lex-o-pedia
What are the powers of the Director General to investigate complaints under the Competition Act?
The Director General under the Competition Act, 2002, investigates anti-competitive practices through powers like summoning individuals, accessing records, and conducting search and seizure. Landmark cases highlight the DG's pivotal role in safeguarding fair competition and consumer welfare.
Read full entry →
Def. lex-o-pedia
How are Evidence Appreciated and Admitted under Indian Law?
The appreciation and admissibility of evidence in India are governed by the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023. This study examines key principles, judicial interpretations, and challenges shaping the role of evidence in ensuring justice.
Read full entry →
Columns 9 min read

Decoding Legal Remedies: A Deep Dive into Review, Revision, and Appeal

Review, Revision, and Appeal are pivotal remedies in the Indian legal framework, designed to address judicial errors and ensure fairness. By examining their distinct purposes, statutory foundations, and judicial interpretations, they uphold justice and procedural integrity.

Anish Sinha
Contributor
Jan 16
Def. lex-o-pedia
How can Decrees Be Executed Effectively?
The execution of decrees under Order XXI CPC ensures judicial decisions are enforced effectively. Modes include delivery of property, attachment, arrest, receivership, partition, and monetary payments, upholding the rule of law and ensuring substantive justice.
Read full entry →
Def. lex-o-pedia
How do the Doctrines of Arrest and Attachment before Judgment operate in Civil Procedure?
The doctrines of arrest and attachment before judgment, codified under Order XXXVIII of the CPC, are safeguards to secure justice by preventing evasion or dissipation of assets. Courts apply these extraordinary measures with caution, balancing fairness and procedural integrity.
Read full entry →
Def. lex-o-pedia
What are the Judicial Commissions under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908?
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, empowers courts to issue commissions under Section 75 and Order XXVI. These commissions address complex legal issues, gather evidence, and ensure procedural efficiency, aiding justice through specialized investigations and impartial reports.
Read full entry →
Def. lex-o-pedia
What are the provisions for custody and arrest under BNSS and CrPC?
Custody, as a cornerstone of the criminal justice system, ensures accountability while balancing individual rights. This analysis examines custody provisions under BNSS and CrPC, exploring judicial safeguards, reforms, and challenges to prevent abuse and uphold justice.
Read full entry →
In Re case-study

Case Study: Shri Mukund Bhavan Trust and Ors v. Shrimant Chhatrapati Udayan Raje Pratapsinh Maharaj Bhonsle and Anr.

The Supreme Court in Shri Mukund Bhavan Trust v. Shrimant Chhatrapati Udayan Raje Bhonsle (2024) held that courts must confidently reject plaints under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC if barred by limitation, stressing that clever drafting can't bypass statutory deadlines.
2025 · 13 min read Held
Judgment
Def. lex-o-pedia
What is John Doe Orders?
John Doe orders address challenges posed by anonymity in legal disputes, particularly in intellectual property rights. Originating in English law, these orders empower courts globally to act against unidentified defendants, balancing rights with enforcement.
Read full entry →
Columns 8 min read

The Global Imperative to Criminalize Ecocide: A Scholarly Inquiry into Environmental Justice

The proposal to criminalize ecocide as an international crime marks a pivotal shift in global justice. By recognizing large-scale environmental harm as a violation of planetary rights, it seeks to deter destruction, ensure accountability, and champion ecological integrity.

Anish Sinha
Contributor
Jan 05
Columns 12 min read

Mimansa Sutras: Bridging Ancient Wisdom and Modern Jurisprudence

The Mimansa principles, rooted in ancient Indian jurisprudence, offer timeless methodologies for statutory interpretation. Balancing textual fidelity with ethical reasoning, they harmonize tradition and modernity, enriching contemporary legal frameworks and advancing equity.

Anish Sinha
Contributor
Jan 04
Columns 10 min read

Nipping frivolous litigation in the Bud: Supreme Court’s landmark decision on Limitation

The Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Shri Mukund Bhavan Trust v. Shrimant Chhatrapati Udayan Raje Bhonsle reaffirms Order VII Rule 11(d)'s power to reject plaints barred by limitation, emphasizing procedural discipline to curb frivolous litigation and uphold judicial efficiency.

Anish Sinha
Contributor
Jan 03
In Re case-study

Case Study: Giriyappa & Anr. V. Kamalamma & Ors.

The Supreme Court in Giriyappa & Anr. v. Kamalamma & Ors. reaffirmed that Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act requires strict compliance with statutory prerequisites, including a valid written contract, lawful possession, and willingness to perform obligations.
2024 · 11 min read Held
Judgment
In Re case-study

Case Study: Indian Maritime University v. Smt. Nimmia Kundlia and anr.

The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission ruled that the District Commission lacked jurisdiction over a fee refund dispute involving the Indian Maritime University. It also held that educational institutions are not "service providers" under the Consumer Protection Act.
2024 · 7 min read Held
Judgment
Def. lex-o-pedia
What is Judicial Notice under the Bharatiya Sakshaya Adhiniyam, 2023?
Judicial notice under the Bharatiya Sakshaya Adhiniyam, 2023, enables courts to recognize facts universally accepted or easily verifiable without formal proof, such as laws, treaties, or public holidays. This promotes efficiency while ensuring fairness in legal proceedings.
Read full entry →
Columns 7 min read

Data Privacy and Competition Law: Uniting Forces in the Digital Age

Data privacy and competition law converge in the digital age, addressing market dominance and personal data misuse. This article explores their synergies, conflicts, and the need for integrated regulations to foster innovation, ensure fairness, and protect rights.

Anish Sinha
Contributor
Dec 26