The Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Shri Mukund Bhavan Trust v. Shrimant Chhatrapati Udayan Raje Bhonsle reaffirms Order VII Rule 11(d)'s power to reject plaints barred by limitation, emphasizing procedural discipline to curb frivolous litigation and uphold judicial efficiency.

The Supreme Court in Giriyappa & Anr. v. Kamalamma & Ors. reaffirmed that Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act requires strict compliance with statutory prerequisites, including a valid written contract, lawful possession, and willingness to perform obligations.

The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission ruled that the District Commission lacked jurisdiction over a fee refund dispute involving the Indian Maritime University. It also held that educational institutions are not "service providers" under the Consumer Protection Act.

Judicial notice under the Bharatiya Sakshaya Adhiniyam, 2023, enables courts to recognize facts universally accepted or easily verifiable without formal proof, such as laws, treaties, or public holidays. This promotes efficiency while ensuring fairness in legal proceedings.

Data privacy and competition law converge in the digital age, addressing market dominance and personal data misuse. This article explores their synergies, conflicts, and the need for integrated regulations to foster innovation, ensure fairness, and protect rights.

The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, governs admissions under Sections 15-21, defining them as oral, written, or electronic statements relevant to legal disputes. It balances evidentiary value with fairness, addressing admissibility, relevance, and confidentiality.

Expert testimony is vital in complex cases requiring specialized knowledge. Sections 39 and 40 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, govern the admissibility and scope of expert opinions, ensuring their relevance and reliability in legal decisions.

The Burden of Proof under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA), 2023 places the responsibility on the party asserting a fact to provide evidence supporting it. Sections 104-114 govern this obligation, ensuring fairness in legal proceedings by preventing baseless claims.

GIFT City, India’s smart financial hub in Gujarat, blends advanced infrastructure with a dynamic regulatory framework. It fosters global collaboration in finance and education, attracting top foreign universities and investors, and positioning India as a global innovation leader.

The Supreme Court in Arif Azim Co. Ltd. v. Micromax Informatics FZE clarified the distinction between the 'seat' and 'venue' in arbitration, reinforcing party autonomy and defining Dubai as the seat under UAE law, limiting Indian courts' jurisdiction.

In Rabindra Kumar Chhatoi v. State of Odisha, the Supreme Court ruled that the backyard of a private house does not qualify as a "public view" under Section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST Act, discharging the appellant from charges of caste-based abuse and related IPC offences.

In Nalin Choksey v. Commissioner of Customs, the SC held that subsequent purchasers aren't liable for customs duty evasion by importers. It ruled that liability arises at importation, not ownership transfer, and set aside duties imposed on the appellant.

India’s trade deficit reflects growing domestic demand and structural challenges like energy reliance and tech imports. Strategic policies, export diversification, and investments in renewable energy and manufacturing aim to balance trade and drive sustainable growth.

The Supreme Court in State of NCT of Delhi v. Mohd. Jabir upheld procedural compliance under Section 50 NDPS Act, ruling that using "any" instead of "nearest" Gazetted Officer doesn’t invalidate the search if substantive rights aren’t prejudiced. Bail was revoked.

The Supreme Court's landmark judgment in Aureliano Fernandes v. State of Goa revitalizes the PoSH Act, addressing systemic lapses in workplace safety for women. By mandating compliance, transparency, and training, it paves the way for equitable and harassment-free workplaces.

The Doctrine of Legitimate Expectation ensures fairness in governance by protecting individuals' reasonable expectations arising from administrative promises or practices. Balancing trust and accountability, it prevents arbitrary actions while respecting public interest.

India’s evolving SBO rules spotlight transparency in corporate ownership. Recent cases, like LinkedIn India and Samsung Noida, highlight expanded interpretations of control and influence, aligning with global standards to enhance governance and prevent financial misconduct.

The Supreme Court in C. Selvarani v. The Special Secretary-cum-District Collector ruled that religious conversions made solely to avail reservation benefits are a "fraud on the Constitution." The decision emphasizes the need for genuine conversions to uphold social justice.

The inherent powers of courts under CPC (Sections 148–153, esp. Section 151) ensure justice by addressing procedural gaps, safeguarding equity, and preventing abuse while respecting statutory limits.

The SC upheld the UP Madarsa Act, balancing state regulation with minority rights, emphasizing secularism as coexistence, not negation, ensuring quality education without infringing religious freedoms.

Hart’s positivism argues that law is valid through procedural origins, independent of morality. Fuller’s natural law contends that ethical principles are essential to law’s legitimacy and social respect.

The Supreme Court’s recent ruling restored Aligarh Muslim University’s minority status, overturning a 1967 decision. This landmark judgment redefines Article 30 protections for minority institutions in India.

The Competition Act, 2002 regulates mergers and acquisitions to prevent monopolies, fostering market fairness. The CCI balances growth with competition, ensuring consumer welfare and economic efficiency.

Appeals in the Indian Code of Civil Procedure enable dissatisfied parties to seek higher court review of lower court judgments, ensuring fairness. They must be statutory, pertain to judicial decrees, and involve aggrieved parties.

Greenwashing misleads consumers with false eco-friendly claims, harming both trust and real sustainability. High-profile cases show why clear regulations and transparency are crucial for accountability.